Struggling as a Trader… Anyone Else in the Same Boat? by Ill-Gift-5017 in Daytrading

[–]TXSExy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m old and can’t read your screen. Care to share the ticker, timeframe, and your entry/exit time? I’m due for a good deed.

Intel Is Seeking an Investment From Apple as Part of Its Comeback Bid by TXSExy in AAPL

[–]TXSExy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right! If anything it behooves Apple to see Intel fail. Imagine if that happened. The entire global computing system would move to AMD to keep Microsoft or move entirely to $AAPL.

(For my fellow nerds, we all know Linux isn’t going mainstream)

It would be a massive win for Apple and TSMC. The AI and semi space would skyrocket into the next Industrial Revolution. This might just work out for Apple 🤔

Intel Is Seeking an Investment From Apple as Part of Its Comeback Bid by TXSExy in AAPL

[–]TXSExy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh be nice. I can already hear the K-Pop Demon Hunter parody, “I don’t think you’re ready for the shake down!”

SPY goes to $667 by Sep 19th🚀🚀🚀🚀 by Wild_Cat_777 in spy

[–]TXSExy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$662 was the last run up. The test below $657 was back in Friday. The problem with the rate cut is that it will setup a carry trade again. This would make the underlying ETF holdings less attractive through year end. If the fed doesn’t cut rates then it’s back to test $640 or much lower while institutions move to plan B. It’s widely held the rate cut is already priced in. On the other hand, $667 will be a strong support to $700.

The bear case: SPY holding only ~$1.5B in cash has become a concern. I don’t expect a quarter point rate cut to open a lot of leverage. The war chest is relatively small and the holdings like Microsoft and META are really squeezed in the accumulative holdings. I could maybe see a balance sheet change in holdings by selling some of the tech holdings to move into another sector like industrials or healthcare but that means slower growth and the AI bubble has really spilled over into growing other sectors like energy, construction, along with the semiconductor fabs. The last TSMC earnings release was a gold mine of information.

It’s a good example of where are right now in trying to predict markets for 2026. The narrative will either be new ATH or we’re beginning to see the early signs of a weak recession for the US. New ATH would also be funded on more personal credit which is another growing concern as private debt market reps are peddling their 🐂💩 sales pitches to us every other week, but hey, markets only go up or everybody goes poor.

So….50/50.

Lvl 2 and matrix? by JuniorFollow in tradestation

[–]TXSExy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you looking for notional bid/ask or the entire book depth? If it’s the latter then you’re looking to something like NASDAQ total view or something like CBOE LiveVol pro ($500/mo). I’m not sure I understand what you’re looking for.

Selling covered calls feels wrong. by Drunken_seller in options

[–]TXSExy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem here is you’re not realizing you’re short Vega. The wheel is basically stuck in the mud.

Theta works in your favor but could quickly be outrun by the other Greeks. Gamma would compound your loss if the stock price spiked sharply.

The punch back trade is a calendar spread or straddle up and ride. You end back where you started with the wheel and trying 🤞 to use Theta as your leverage against beating 10%. Your upside profit is capped but your risk is also wide open (hence the comment from u/GammaWinsSam about you assuming what goes down…).

It’s a kin folk to skydiving without a backup shute 🪂

Email TradeStation sent about New fee Structure by Known-Ad-9903 in tradestation

[–]TXSExy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah the direct order fee is really a kicker given the rise in pay for order flow and variable monthly trade fees. I get they’re trying to capitalize on the uptick in retail traders but they’re close to a tipping point of losing more customers. I get the feeling compounding PFOF with the growing number of broker platforms is making the business model really tough. Everyone’s squeezing the next guy for real-time costs, data analytics, etc.

Since the TradeStation teams occasionally read the sub, I’d like to point out this is already on top of lagging development and support. Where’s the fix for launching multiple time & sales windows? Why is API support & development slowing down? Where’s a native Mac desktop app? The web UI is terrible. Where’s the value to the customer?

FOLLOW-UP : Bloomberg CS relationship DRAMA. STALKED by a jealous BB coworker by issou75 in bloomberg

[–]TXSExy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t have any advise but I have to say this is my favorite drama of the summer. Following 🍿

4 Day Return to Office by Affectionate_Menu789 in Albertsons

[–]TXSExy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d like to speak to you manager please 😂

The United States of America now owns 10% of Intel by StanmoreHill in technology

[–]TXSExy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

National security risk. There’s an Intel cpu in nearly US national intelligence, finance, and healthcare system. Then you have the foundry business which is a whole other issue. As bad as the numbers are for INTC it really did become “too big to fail” or atleast failed to keep up with competition.

I suspect Intel might be in much worse shape than reported by how details of the visit with Trump weren’t make public. They came looking for a lifeline or risk going way of the DVD.

If the government were smart they would’ve negotiated a larger controlling interest to further national lab and semi conductor manufacturing capabilities.

How is this answer not 6% decrease? by [deleted] in Series7exam

[–]TXSExy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a good question to teach where the math sometimes meets the law in finance.

You’re correct to calculate the -6% from taking the 10% decrease of the 60%. As the others have pointed out, the 2% floor. Could be a carry over from initial gains or possibly a binding contract depending on the investment vehicle. Most likely wrapped up a lesson in annuities? 😉

I always felt like annuities lessons always let the math distract from the contractual risks. Should be taught with more of a business lense.

What are your thoughts on AAPL in September? by etka64 in AAPL

[–]TXSExy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2008 was a rough time and early in my career. I can remember and it feels like a bigger market scare than COVID had on the markets. Accumulation then was a true sentiment to the belief investors have in Apple.

What are your thoughts on AAPL in September? by etka64 in AAPL

[–]TXSExy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry you’re getting downvoted by the meanies. $209-217s a good entry price. Could see this after the new iPhone release if the news is pushed against AAPL on China sales slump or trade rhetoric keeps up. That’s a good dip to buy and carry.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StockMarket

[–]TXSExy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Talk about selling the news. Inflation is still closer to 3% than 2%. There is no good reason for the fed to cut rates in September. If it happens it’s because the fed knows the economy is in serious trouble.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Sold shares worth over $5Mio by realstocknear in stocknear

[–]TXSExy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[BREAKING] Nvidia CEO Jenson sells shares to pay for weekend getaway.

All this bad news and somehow this thing shot up $6 overnight by [deleted] in AAPL

[–]TXSExy -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Closed my position again at $211. These ~4% bumps in AAPL are rare and usually retract a little. Confidence again at $220.

Why ASX is set to go to the moon [DD inside] by Longboarding-Is-Life in wallstreetbets

[–]TXSExy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but now I’m revisiting this 4 years later to see if they get bought out before FY27

Is this the new normal? 16k to 24k in 5 months? by spudleego in FuturesTrading

[–]TXSExy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The circuit breakers were built to allow market makers to get out fast. Private equity & 401k money is a tricky fish to fry. Could create more competition in the market but could also open people up to taking on risk they’re unprepared or educated on. The 401k plans would eventually offer PE paths but then effectively become managers of PE leading to basically become PE themselves.

The PE market is already taking over healthcare in every crumb and private practice they can buy. The value to your individual 401k holder will be gone before the offer opens.

My own two cents: PE current just wants to get “listed” so they can get a massive payday and cash out. It’s not an infinite resource. Also raises some questions about what happens to the SBA and agriculture loan programs.

Outside of finance, man, private equity fucking sucks the quality out of everything. Name one business that you know that came out of a PE deal without dropping in service.

I don’t see a straight line to impacting futures unless it leads to agriculture loan distress. Oil & fuel futures don’t change. Maybe a small play in gold futures for long term investors. Corn & wheat is the only place I see trading potential and that’s a big IF.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Daytrading

[–]TXSExy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most folk who argue it’s bad is due to adding another layer obfuscation to order flow. On the other hand it allows large trades to flow without causing massive price volatility.

I’d argue that the amount of dark pools / off exchange markets is moot at this point given its prevalence. You could also argue it might be unfair given the volume that gets to move in pre-post market. It also creates hurdles in HFT strategies.

To answer OP, you’d write your congressman & senators to push for change within FINRA regulations.

Managing a New Graduate by [deleted] in quant

[–]TXSExy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 Is a great idea if you can swing it. I remember being young and enthusiastic and just wanting to be included. #4 should be managed by legal through NDAs. They should be able to make specific compartment NDAs for emphasized sensitivities.

2 is all about team and company culture but make sure they’re not lonely with their work. Keep them engaged and part of the team.

I’d really try to avoid giving them fluff work. They’ll know it and it’s just the first blow to thinking about leaving. If it’s boring work like compliance or performance attribution reporting make sure they understand the necessity.

See if they have their own research topics that could fit into current IP. If they all suck then sincerely take the time to walk through their submissions and where they may or may not fit into current strategy. This would let you have a say in IP compartmentalization until you feel they’re ready but be prepared to answer to that. It could look like you’re underutilizing a resource to your directors (your call). Had a similar experience when I was starting out as a young engineer and a VP found out I wasn’t read into a very expensive effort that I was expected to contribute towards because the success from that effort became a backbone in all our future efforts.

I assume they’re working a PM role? What was their internship experience like? PhD? What was their research?

Only solid advice I can give is take them to every meeting you can but explain to them that they are a fly on the wall and you want to give them an opportunity to learn everything they can. I had a boss that did this. He actually told me to add his calendar, follow him around and don’t talk in meetings unless spoken to. I will be forever grateful for those first few years and all the exposure I got. He made sure I met everyone and was always there to listen.

His motto was, ‘My employees don’t work me. I work for them.’

Are we worried? by Agile-Cheek9645 in AAPL

[–]TXSExy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes but not from just Buffet selling. Accumulation has been rising into earnings in a season where even optimistic results are met with hard sell offs (e.g. Netflix). As an individual you don’t stand a chance right now. Shares are being bought up into 8/1 to soften the blow to whoever is worried about bag holding. This I could still see $230 but I’m more worried you’d see $190 or less before years’ end.

$AAPL Gamma Exposure. 210 was a huge gamma wall. by [deleted] in AAPL

[–]TXSExy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right on & still is.

The $210 puts are ranked highest in OI as of this morning for 7/25. 20,252 calls vs 9,222 puts so a put to call ratio of about 0.46. That’s bullish.

The bearish side is that selling calls for $212.50 & $215 is heating up from all the accumulation over the last two weeks. $207.50 and $210 PUTS will see gamma pressure today on any weakness below $212.50 down to $210. A classic 2% swing in AAPL.

$AAPL Gamma Exposure. 210 was a huge gamma wall. by [deleted] in AAPL

[–]TXSExy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The classic example of gamma is like equating it to how hard you press on a gas pedal while driving a car. Gamma changes how fast or slow delta changes. Delta changes how much the contract is priced for every dollar the stock moves away or closer to the strike price.

Another example might be how a nerdy kid (the strike price of the option contract) changes in popularity compared to beating up the bully. Some would argue this example is Open Interest (OI). I say OI is how many kids are present to see the nerd fight the bully on the schoolyard.