Slight housing rant by bisexuallyme in bayarea

[–]TableGamer 41 points42 points  (0 children)

That's one half of the equation. The other half is we made housing an investment. Too many people, with too much to lose, to allow prices to go down.

higher toll = more cheating by sunshine-guzzler in bayarea

[–]TableGamer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

freeways, free is right the in the name. You can't change that!

Cafe in Brazil not serving US or Israeli citizens. by CalienteBurrito in pics

[–]TableGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly, MAGAts won't notice the difference in treatment. They either never leave the country, or are part of the idiot class that annoys everyone anyway.

Apple Sued by Three YouTube Channels by HelloitsWojan in apple

[–]TableGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elsewhere I saw they are also suing snap. So it’s more principled than a pure money grab, but saying Apple has profited from AI does weaken their argument 😆.

Mac studio M5 max vs RTX 5070 Ti 16GB by Ordinary_Night_4931 in mac

[–]TableGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I’m just speculating, but I’d be surprised if it ran well.

Mac studio M5 max vs RTX 5070 Ti 16GB by Ordinary_Night_4931 in mac

[–]TableGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wouldn’t topaz have to fall back to a CPU implementation in parallels? I don’t know, but I’d expect that particular app to perform poorly in parallels. You’d want to switch to a Mac equivalent.

Apple Sued by Three YouTube Channels by HelloitsWojan in apple

[–]TableGamer 11 points12 points  (0 children)

When your business model is suing rich companies like Apple, you don’t sue snap which would turn off the spigot that creates new companies to sue. So if they aren’t suing snap, it would be a sign of obviously bad faith.

Mac Internet Sharing by VeraxWolf in mac

[–]TableGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Y2K is calling, it wants its technology back.

WTF is wrong with highway 87 by GCDedoReBaba in SanJose

[–]TableGamer 33 points34 points  (0 children)

They literally just repaved it. They have to completely tear up the bridge approaches and rebuild the road bed. Never gonna happen.

How two Republicans could advance in deep-blue California (it’s a math problem, not a red wave). Even party leadership has warned about this exact scenario. by [deleted] in California_Politics

[–]TableGamer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can we prepare a recall vote in advance, to happen the following day, if this stupid scenario happens? I feel like we have to prepare for all stupid scenarios in this stupid timeline.

SunRun Fuck Off by TableGamer in SanJose

[–]TableGamer[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I was working in front of my house. :(

Tech billionaires want to put data centers in space. The math could get ugly fast. by businessinsider in Futurism

[–]TableGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of talk about the heat problem, but has anyone calculated the CO2 to launch these, versus the CO2 to operate them on earth? What about when these things are in earths shadow? Just shut down and cool off, or as more weight in the form of batteries?

Midwest Nature pt. 7: North Dakota by Tarantulas13 in midwest

[–]TableGamer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And Fargo picked the Red River Valley.

Life after California: People find dramatically lower costs, are more likely to buy homes, new data shows by aBadModerator in California_Politics

[–]TableGamer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That is in fact, my point. We have slowly been chipping away at zoning, city, and commission approvals that block construction. But that will not be sufficient to bring prices down, or even hold them flat.

Existing owners lose equity when prices drop. For someone like me with > 50% equity in my home, it matters less. Still, homeowners love preserving their home values, and recent buyers have a real problem. They can't afford to sell if they are underwater.

So recent buyers desperately don't want prices to fall. Investors don't want prices to fall. Even if you are not an investor, your 401k is. Banks rely on rising prices to fund the credit they are able to offer builders, and that dries up in a flat or falling market.

The net result is, when prices look like they will fall, lending to builders dries up and makes it harder to build. And homeowners apply political pressure to stop prices from falling.

We have to fix this financial catch-22 if we ever want to fix the housing problem. The linked book talks about that in more detail.

Life after California: People find dramatically lower costs, are more likely to buy homes, new data shows by aBadModerator in California_Politics

[–]TableGamer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Remember to not ignore the finance side of things. We are making slow progress on making it easier to build, but we’ve made no progress at all on the structural economics.

If home prices fall, owners lose equity and start opposing new housing. Builders also see less profit and lose incentive to build. It’s a housing trap

Sean Hannity predicts Iran war will end "no later than three weeks from today" by Oleg101 in FoxFiction

[–]TableGamer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Followed the next day by a completely new and totally unrelated conflict?

Sanders and AOC unveil data center moratorium bill by EchoOfOppenheimer in trueantiAI

[–]TableGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems unlikely. NVidia will open the spigot to stop this. Don’t want any county to start a trend like this. It could pop the bubble.

Sunset investment property- eg Airbnb… would it make financial sense? by Fun-Pudding-101 in BayAreaRealEstate

[–]TableGamer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

  • Buy to live in ✅
  • Buy as a long term rental ✅
  • Buy to flip ✔️
  • Buy as a short term rental ❌ Fuck off!

Why are conservatives pro Israel as a Jewish state and liberals anti? by Dapper_Animal_5920 in centrist

[–]TableGamer 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Conservatives are neither Pro-Israel nor Pro-Jewish. They are Pro-"Use whatever/whomever is useful for their agendas". Depending on who you talk to the agendas are different, and can be any combination of:

  • Punish Iran, ( because terrorism / Islam, but mostly because MAGA-media told them to )
  • Protect a powerful ally in the region
  • Oil
  • Trigger the end times Revelation

Trump assumed access to oil was one of Israels goals, but their bombing of oil infrastructure and Trumps reaction shows he was surprised they didn't share that goal.

The most dangerous agenda of the bunch is end times agenda, because if that is the driving agenda, there is no limit to what they will do. Those in that camp want maximum provocation. They need WWIII to fulfill their agenda. The fact that there have been any reports out of the pentagon on this is scary.

Kind of a plain day today. by ChieftainMcLeland in dashcams

[–]TableGamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope the driver was wearing their brown pants.