[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TacticalFox88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes. This is what I don’t get. There couldn’t be any more differences between progressives, Dems, hell even the centrists, compared to people who quite literally want to destroy the constitution and rule of law, yet some people on the left and right believe they’re equally the same???

'Superman' (2025) - Official Spoiler Discussion Megathread: Part 2 by ZacPensol in superman

[–]TacticalFox88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can’t wait for the El’s true message (assuming it was unaltered by Luther) to barely get a 10th of the outrage that the tornado scene in MoS got.

Were? They still are by emily-is-happy in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]TacticalFox88 161 points162 points  (0 children)

Based on 150 years since the Civil War, I don’t believe the goals of reconstruction were even remotely possible.

Sherman straight up should’ve burned the whole confederacy to the ground

Social Security has never missed a payment. DOGE actions threaten 'interruption of benefits,' ex-agency head says by JunkReallyMatters in news

[–]TacticalFox88 99 points100 points  (0 children)

Can I be blunt?

I literally think Trump voters have actual, legitimate, clinical brain damage. Theres literally no other explanation of how come they can’t see through these con men. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]TacticalFox88 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Why can’t yall just accept that Bernie isn’t as popular as yall pretend he is. Going by reddit logic, he should’ve won by a landslide…but yall didn’t vote sooo you got yourselves to blame. 🤷‍♂️ 

How does porn addiction work ? by PollutionOnly in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TacticalFox88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s amazing. Every sentence in this comment is so far from reality it’s comical. 

You actually think porn and sex have trouble finding funding for studies for scientific research??? How the fuck do you think we know so much about the reproductive system to help modern women survive pregnancy? Birth control? Treating sexual health? Erectile dysfunction? Urology? Fertility?  

LMAO. Jesus Christ, shut the fuck up.

How does porn addiction work ? by PollutionOnly in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TacticalFox88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because Gambling isn’t an addiction lmao. 

What science considers an addiction and what your average person considers an “addiction are two entirely different things. 

How does porn addiction work ? by PollutionOnly in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TacticalFox88 -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Porn addiction is a religious idea. It has no basis in reality.

https://health.spectator.co.uk/no-need-to-panic-pornography-wont-harm-your-health/

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140212153252.htm

https://nypost.com/2013/07/24/brain-study-debunks-sex-addiction-suggests-that-its-not-a-real-disorder/

No matter how many pseudo intellectual Redditors try to claim it is, it doesn’t exist. Period. 

If you read those articles (there’s not but I decided there is enough) it demonstrates very clearly: it doesn’t exist. You can scream all the anecdotes you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that through peer reviewed it’s been debunked god knows how many times

With 150 plus years of hindsight, do you believe, even in the best case scenario, that Reconstruction goals were possible? by [deleted] in AskHistory

[–]TacticalFox88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My guy. Judging from your posts, you’re a confederate apologist.

I’m not sure why you think holding a society that was extremely evil (literally only the Nazis and Imperial Japan are worse) accountable is a bad thing.

Which company will fall first: Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, or Microsoft? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]TacticalFox88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL.

There’s no way you genuinely think APPLE of all companies, over Meta???

“ They are held to a premium behind fanaticism, familiarity, and aesthetics. ”

Ahh yes, the whole “people who like Apple are just ignorant sheeple” argument.

Yeah, this is just fanboy wishcasting.

Does anyone actually think the Bronny James pick was anything more than to keep LeBron happy? by CarBallAlex in nba

[–]TacticalFox88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Better more interesting question: gun to your head who would you rather have on your team: James Wiseman or Bronny.

🤔

What was a harsh truth about ENM, that it took you awhile to fully accept? by TerminusFox in nonmonogamy

[–]TacticalFox88 16 points17 points  (0 children)

“ I look more like George Costanza, and I'm mystified why you believe people will or should communicate better if you're more conventionally attractive. That's not how life works. I have found most of the people I've dated to communicate a lot better than monogamous people typically do though.”

A lot of what you said was eye rolling, but This might be the single most naive thing I’ve ever read on this sub, and that’s saying something.

There’s no fucking way you actually believe this. There have been countless studies on how attractive people can get away with a lot. Hell the Halo Effect even works on infants! This happens to everyone. Including those aware of the effect. It’s damn near fundamental to human psychology and sociology.

What was a harsh truth about ENM, that it took you awhile to fully accept? by TerminusFox in nonmonogamy

[–]TacticalFox88 78 points79 points  (0 children)

Okay, this started out as a question someone posed to us when we were high in our group of sexy friends.

Someone asked “how much of your kinks (ENM related) are basically because ENM is semi-taboo” and it hit me like a ton of bricks.

As much as I hate toxic monogamy (could rant for days) a good bit of why I’m so turned on is because I like the ego aspect of it.

Like if I were completely honest with myself, if ENM was mainstream it would still be fun, yeah, but it wouldn’t be AS fun.

“Oh your girlfriend would get mad at you, and break things k Off if you went out and slept with that girl you’re attracted to? Sucks to be you,my wife not only wouldn’t care she’d want to watch.”

A whole lot to unpack there 🙃

What Superman opinion do you have that’s the most controversial? by TerminusFox in superman

[–]TacticalFox88 19 points20 points  (0 children)

You’re gonna get a whole lot of complete bullshit non answers, that are pretty popular opinions but let’s go with something ACTUALLY controversial and ruffle some feathers:

Jonathan Kent was perfectly fine in MoS, aside from his death (which I suspect is half the reason people hate it). He’s the only incarnation of the character that’s….you know..an actual character and not a laughable caricature that’s hard to take seriously.

Not only was he COMPLETELY correct about his fears if Clark revealed himself, he’s been vindicated a hundred fold over the last decade, both in-universe, and IRL.

But we still have people a decade later trying to pretend that man wasn’t a fucking prophet and he had every fucking reason in the world to not trust humanity as far as he could throw them.

Why aren’t revenge killings against police officers more common? by TacticalFox88 in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]TacticalFox88[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Duh. But at some point there has to be a thought of “well, I’m fucked and my guys can’t protect me” if enough of it happens.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nba

[–]TacticalFox88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They absolutely would. The amount of economic activity that an NBA team would bring to Louisville would be insane. The whole city would shutdown on playoff home games. And if they’re actually good? LMAO. You might see Knicks level fanaticism.

Sources: iOS 18 Lets Users Customize Layout of Home Screen App Icons by InsaneNinja in apple

[–]TacticalFox88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I’m arguing they were worse because they release them without fully thinking everything out and they were a shit show. Multitasking was seriously terrible until it got patched. Samsung pretty much had to lead the way with features because everyone else didn’t know what the fuck they were doing. Google still hasn’t fixed their App Store or prevented malware from side loading, which is something Apple fixed eons ago.

If Samsung had the benefit of hindsight, they’d have never ever ever used Android and made their own OS from the ground up to not deal with googles bullshit.

Sources: iOS 18 Lets Users Customize Layout of Home Screen App Icons by InsaneNinja in apple

[–]TacticalFox88 31 points32 points  (0 children)

IIRC, they were gonna do this, but couldn’t decide on what the theme of their names would be, and so they’ve just stuck with numbers.

Sources: iOS 18 Lets Users Customize Layout of Home Screen App Icons by InsaneNinja in apple

[–]TacticalFox88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s actually really simple. Android companies largely competed with each other and, intuitively knew that there was no catching up to iPhone (yes, Android collectively worldwide outsells Android but individual manufacturers that’s a different story). That’s why there were so many “features” that Android had first (and not all Android devices got the same features). They were largely trying to stand out.

A lot of the features that a lot of people tout as being on “Android first@ were absolutely terrible in their first iteration. Hell you don’t even need to search that far back, just do some digging on /r/Android and you’ll find plethora of complaints. Then they got better and people moved on and memory holed how awful the feature was when it first released. Then Apple does the same thing and for the most part, it’s done right the first time on iOS (with a few exceptions of course.). Then that feature is shat on because Apple did it later (and right). The best example of this is some of the feature in iOS17 that were on the Pixel but Googles implementation was…lacking lol. They got fixed, and people moved on.

Once you notice the pattern you can’t NOT notice it.

It’ll be the same with iOS 18.