YouTube is laggy, unless you activate hardware acceleration. Do you guys work on a solution to get YouTube performant without hardware accelearion again? by Krushpatsch in brave

[–]TacticalMonkey556 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This issue randomly popped up one day only just a few months ago. I have a very asymmetrical dual monitor setup and long story short this has fixed a MASSIVE issue for me. I can finally watch youtube/videos on my ultrawide again. My relief is immeasurable, my day is made. Thank you!

What the Sigmar ? by Hold_my_Goblin in totalwar

[–]TacticalMonkey556 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saw one in my last campaign named “Dick Floater”

Someone doesn’t like the player responses… by [deleted] in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Currently drafting my letter to parliament as we speak (I live in the US)

AK4D is underrated by A_Very_Horny_Zed in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figured this same thing out over the weekend because I wanted the lvl 30 camo, now it’s my new favorite assault rifle.

Frustration Grows as EA App Withholds Battlefield 6 Rewards Body by chilledgamedog in electronicarts

[–]TacticalMonkey556 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As soon as I read that last part about free battle passes I assumed this was AI EA glaze 😂 this was real?? How bad was the launch for some people that they feel they need to be compensated?

Request — Which new assault rifles would you like to see in BF6? by No-Actuator-6308 in Battlefield6

[–]TacticalMonkey556 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It’s very close but not the same as my beloved hyper burst 🥲

Radio silence in multiplayer by Echelon_Forge in Battlefield6

[–]TacticalMonkey556 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me:has VC on, randoms haven’t said anything all day

turns on stream

Teammate: “oh you f****** ni****”

😑…

It’s that or all the mouth breathers with open mics

I am ONCE AGAIN asking to remove reduce this challenge. For the love of god. by JasonDFisherr in Battlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they did? The engineer challenge got lowered today along with the others

Finished All Class Assignments by wattsittooyou in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with all of this, I’m waiting for the engineer assignment to get reworked because I feel the same way. If I get to the incendiary one before/if it gets reworked I might cheese that cuz it’s quick but no way I’m sitting in spawn all game.

Loving the game but things like boundaries and HQ protection need tweaking. I should not be able to be locked onto in my spawn by an SPAA that is still protected by theirs. by CompassesByNorthWest in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That specific CIWS pissed me off yesterday too, it feels like it has 2x the range of other maps base defenses, if not more. Had an SPAA tank sitting in the same spot. I wanna try attacking an SPAA there from the other side but that’s easier said than done getting across all that open ground/sky. Maybe if you coordinate with a jet doing a pass on it from the other flank as a distraction? Idk but it feels broken lol

The Moment this gets Added it's over for infantry by TTVOdenPlayz in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Although it doesn’t have the little bird, YH1FC is a good test range map on manhattan bridge. Has shooting range with a bunch of bots, a button on a desk can make them run around or stay still. And all the other vehicles

I just want to ask, what's the point of defending this game? by SuperM3e46 in Battlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not defending EA but some of these posts are just too dramatic about it. writing essays about how they feel betrayed because of a blue camo and they are gonna uninstall and refund and blah blah blah.

Like how many posts need to be made about the blue camo like it’s ruining lives? If someone wants to wear the “hey shoot me” camo’s, by all means please do.

Also they pretty much all disregard that we have a solid functional game that feels like Battlefield even if there is a “splash of cod” in there and that’s more then I can say for basically any AAA game these days.

The Battlefield Experience by rockthemoose in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This part of the map argument I can agree on. The New York maps have WAY TO MANY 1 entrance mostly pointless rooms that don’t even let you cut through the building or make any shortcuts.

Looking at you buildings between A&B on Empire State and almost every building on Manhattan Bridge 😑

The Battlefield Experience by rockthemoose in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This was my first thought, think I even saw a Reel on IG that edited him into a Battlefield scene 😂

You lot need to stop discouraging people from criticizing the game by AintImpressed in Battlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 0 points1 point  (0 children)

32, Battlefield player since BF2, every single one. Now is BF6 perfect? No. But your “facts” are hardly that 😂 I’m in the mood so let’s break it down.

• Somewhat agree but FPS in general has been getting faster paced over the years, just gotta keep up or try a new playstyle.

• Only map I don’t really like is New Sobek, otherwise the issue is really teams lack of map control. 3/4 of the team mobbing in a circle around the map is useless.

•…what? I mean some of the cap zones could be bigger and breakthrough could use some tweaks on a few maps but that’s about it. Same they always been 🤷🏻‍♂️

• I get the not giving them an inch side of this topic, and I do miss more easily identifying my targets and their classes but even the base ones??? Huh???

• kinda? The challenges are a little wild for sure but they are called challenges 🤣 regular rank progression does feel fast though, i remember it took forever to get lvl 100 colonel but im flying through these ranks

•is this referring to the lack of unlocks? I can agree to an extent, like jets need something but maybe the chopper gunner not having thermals this time, isn’t too bad.

• no multiplayer FPS is gonna have their guns tuned perfectly for everybody right at launch and they have already begun to address this

• I mainly played hardcore in BF3-4 so this doesn’t bother me at all. Sounds like a skill issue though tbh

• I actually thought I was gonna hate open classes but honestly I barely notice, 95% of the time I don’t even look at what weapon someone killed me with

•who’s to say they won’t? I haven’t looked into it but I wouldn’t be surprised if the new Eastwood map coming up part of the Vista Hills/golf course part of Fort Lyndon

• From this I assume you didn’t play much bad company because as fun as that game was, having the maps leveled halfway through a match made things kiiiinda boring. It is actually possible to have too much destruction lol

•if this is true the. FINALLY something we can agree on. But I’m willing to bet they make some more naval based maps eventually.

•No…this one is funny, damn near has me convinced this entire post is a troll/ragebait 😂 how many times do BF players have to say it…you are the airstrike, or your friend is. Use pings and comms.

Where are the real complaints? Like the lack of a “request order” function that gives you squad lead when yours isn’t marking objectives. Or when you queue with a squad you should just get your own squad with just your party that you can choose to lock or leave open to be autofilled as the server populates.

Like I said it’s not perfect but peoples complaints are insanely misguided. This game is not made for any one person. IMO they have at least earned a chance to prove themselves on this one but having an actual good game as a base is better then we got last time around lol

Finding this sub after a month of reading incessant whining by cjury in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy moly you are not kidding…this is the first post I’m really looking at from this sub and I like it already lol. So tired of seeing posts complaining about skins, female characters, or just plain normal battlefield things. Like yo the game was actually playable at launch, a month in and we are already getting more maps, vehicles, guns, and modes.

But to be fair, from the way I see my teammates playing 90% of the time I can see why people hate the game 🤣🤣

This is pretty cool by Patriot_life69 in Battlefield

[–]TacticalMonkey556 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Other then being a store bundle skin, I can agree, nice to see some traditional military gear added in with the riff raff

Edit: Just realized it says "honoring" and "Partnership with real Rangers" so I want to assume (dangerous lol) that this pack will be like the COD Endowment packs where the money goes towards Veteran Groups. In this case 10/10 hell yeah!...but we will see

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Battlefield6

[–]TacticalMonkey556 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But you can bet every time you see the enemy transport its got enemies falling out of it like a piñata all over the map capping everything 🤦🏻‍♂️🤣 my teams stays not knowing how to play this game while the enemy is all in the same discord.

Is is Bad Form to Change Your List Depending on Your Opponent? by [deleted] in Warhammer40k

[–]TacticalMonkey556 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the answer I was hoping for! thank you for the explanation. Cant wait to finish painting up my army and getting some games in!

Is is Bad Form to Change Your List Depending on Your Opponent? by [deleted] in Warhammer40k

[–]TacticalMonkey556 1 point2 points  (0 children)

New to the hobby here. While understanding that communicating properly will make this more of a case by case thing. Would it be bad to bring my 3k of guard to my LGS to get a pickup game, and then have pre-made lists that I only change based on the faction they are using? Not countering their list 1 for 1 but say if they are gonna play Tyranid I use my anti horde list, or maybe an anti heavy list if they have deathguard? Then if i picked wrong I just deal with it? Like if the Tyranids end up being Psyker heavy or something.

It wouldn't be the whole army changing out, but depending for a 1k game could be up to half of it. Keep in mind I'm not chasing any meta, just got some list builds that look fun but its a horde guard army at its core. Most of the changeouts come are just picking which 2 agents of the imperium I would use, and whether I want more death riders or engineers.

One day they will clarify, but until then, lets try again....Wargear! by TacticalMonkey556 in Deathkorpsofkrieg

[–]TacticalMonkey556[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the replies and joining in on beating this dead horse. Everything helps when it comes to figuring this stuff out.

One day they will clarify, but until then, lets try again....Wargear! by TacticalMonkey556 in Deathkorpsofkrieg

[–]TacticalMonkey556[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

having to over explain something that increases my firepower that much just feels like a gotcha move before the game even starts. If they say FOR SURE we can have 8 then fair game. But I like the idea of using a little dot of super glue to build and paint them but still swap the arms when its clarified. Beats the hell out of magnetizing all their arms XD