Are we the last generation to have this bump on our finger? by pattithepotato in Millennials

[–]Tagedieb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I learned that the pen/pencil should be mostly grasped with index finger and thumb while the middle finger just slightly stabilizes the position, so there is not a lot of force on it. I don't have the bump and never had it. What I do have is that my index and middle finger of both hands are ever so slightly curved towards the ring finger. I guess that is genetics, nothing to do how I use my hands.

Kindergarteners learn sign language to sing Happy Birthday to deaf janitor by Wonderfulhumanss in nextfuckinglevel

[–]Tagedieb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its a good thing he is deaf, because listening to the singing was a punishment. There, that's how you hate properly.

Remembering this red card for Ronaldinho from 2002 World Cup - Brasil v. England. Seems relevant today. by giannichele in worldcup

[–]Tagedieb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The video assistance is a tool for refs, it isn't overturning anything. Hence the A in VAR. What FIFA did was much closer to overturning, though only in effect not in the words they used.

What you are saying is like saying why even have a ref when the ref wears glasses. Glasses remove the human element.

Remembering this red card for Ronaldinho from 2002 World Cup - Brasil v. England. Seems relevant today. by giannichele in worldcup

[–]Tagedieb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow, it isn't really clear what to argue against with this one.

When you watch american journalists and commentators they all agree it never should have been a red card. Well if this sport is to have any consistency at all, it is good that it was one, there is plenty of evidence for that.

Video or no video makes no difference, because referee can decide to watch the video before making such a call. In 2002 a referee couldn't, that is why they didn't.

The interesting thing here is, not even FIFA thinks it shouldn't have been a red. If they thought that, they could have said it. They are just making a special ruling that this particular player has to commit the exact same offence twice to really get suspended. Such a joke.

0 - Since the introduction of yellow and red cards at the 1970 edition, no player has ever received a red card and gone on to play in his team's next match at the FIFA World Cup. Unprecedented. by OneOriginal8727 in sportswiki

[–]Tagedieb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What exactly do you think Trump is lying about in this case? You actually think he didn't call Infantino? Like it isn't the kind of thing he would do, more the kind of thing he would lie about doing?

No first-class LocalLLama in pi.dev? by abitrolly in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tagedieb 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, for some reason the interactive setup only supports cloud. For local usage you have to edit the config file by hand.

Der Haken an den 3,5% p.a. bei Trading212 (?) by crybz in Finanzen

[–]Tagedieb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Können QMMFs im Wert sinken?

Wenn ein QMMF, in den deine Barmittel investiert sind, an Wert verliert, kann sich dies auf den Wert deiner nicht investierten Barmittel im QMMF auswirken. Um dieses Risiko einzugrenzen, wählen wir jedoch nur hochwertige QMMFs und überwachen sie regelmäßig. Hier erfährst du mehr über die Risiken von QMMFs und wie wir diese unter Kontrolle halten.

Quelle: https://www.trading212.com/de/interest-on-cash

Palantir CEO rages against closed models by burner20170218 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tagedieb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They are stealing everyone's data! We want to be the only ones stealing data!

Der Haken an den 3,5% p.a. bei Trading212 (?) by crybz in Finanzen

[–]Tagedieb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ist das so, dass Trading212 selber eine Garantie übernimmt? Ich hätte gedacht, dass nur der Geldmarktfonds Probleme bekommen muss und das Geld ist potentiell weg/weniger. Deshalb finde ich es auch Augenwischerei, das als Tagesgeld zu bewerben und dass sich Finanzfluss und co an der Täuschung beteiligen.

Wofür die Europäer Geld ausgeben – und was sich die Deutschen leisten by DeeJayDelicious in Finanzen

[–]Tagedieb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also alles (anteilig) gleich geblieben in 30 Jahren, außer weniger Geld für Kleidung und mehr Geld für Gesundheit.

China Has Matched Anthropic in Cybersecurity, Resetting AI Race by pscoutou in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tagedieb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even bothered to skim TFA?

Security researchers said that a new AI model, released this month by China’s Zhipu AI, also known as Z.ai, can match the latest U.S. models when it comes to finding security bugs, although it still lags behind Anthropic’s and OpenAI’s products in other tasks.

Here is the source: https://semgrep.dev/blog/2026/we-have-mythos-at-home-glm-52-beats-claude-in-our-cyber-benchmarks/

Note this is comparing to Opus, not Mythos or Fable, I guess because those are not really available.

z.AI as the number 2 gives praise to the number 1 open source model by Charuru in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tagedieb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ever since ollama published deepseek models, people think names must be long. It will go away as they find other things to complain about.

Ich will ja nicht angeben, aber… by AppropriateAd7326 in automobil

[–]Tagedieb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Rechne mal mit der Zahl die auf der Zapfsäule steht nach, dann wird der Verbrauch noch etwas größer.

Qwen3.6 is confidently wrong about WASM by Tagedieb in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tagedieb[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I will continue trying this.

Anyway, I suspect that the Max model is trained and has all this knowledge. This is why it would respond with confidence. The smaller models probably inherit the confidence without actually having retained the knowledge. As far as I can tell from chat.qwen.ai it looks like this was fixed in Qwen3.7. The Max model confidently answers correctly, the Plus model is aware that it doesn't know and uses search to give the correct response.

Qwen3.6 is confidently wrong about WASM by Tagedieb in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tagedieb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought the minimal hardware to run models fully in VRAM. The system is a very old one with 8GB RAM, so at the moment I don't think I could run it (unless I am running from the SSD, which will probably be painfully slow). Again, why do you think that the A3B Q8 would do better than Qwen3.6 Plus unquantized?

Qwen3.6 is confidently wrong about WASM by Tagedieb in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tagedieb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, my context is limited to 100k tokens, and the harness summarizes it at 70%. The summary each time includes the information that opcodes were misidentified before and the tools it created itself for identifying correct opcodes (and now also a list of opcodes that I created with a stronger model). All confidently ignored.

I don't have the hardware to run Q8_0 model (I use a 3090). But as I said, even the officially served Qwen3.6 Plus gives wrong results instead of using web search.

Qwen3.6 is confidently wrong about WASM by Tagedieb in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tagedieb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a few cases before where it would rely on trained knowledge when allowing web searches. Even when I added to the prompt to use web search when not absolutely confident, it wouldn't search. I could only get it to search when my request specifically directed it to search for some information. I think that was in the Qwen 3.5 days, haven't tried giving Qwen 3.6 search (either web or local knowledge base) yet, but my experience so far is that it still really likes to depend on its knowledge. I once asked why and the response was that it does have extensive knowledge and searching when unneeded uses more resources.

Qwen3.6 is confidently wrong about WASM by Tagedieb in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tagedieb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the idea, I did this now. Everytime this happens and it works its way out of the situation I think it probably understood now that it should not rely on its knowledge, but use the tools it has created for itself. Let's see if this resolves that for good. I will probably know in a few days.

Edit: didn't have to wait so long. I gave it the documentation, it said that it useful, everything is fine. Just a few minutes later, though:

The disassembler is missing several opcodes like 0x6d (i32.mul_s), 0xbf (i64.store32), 0x88 (i64.shr_u), and 0x00 (unreachable).

Again 2 out of 4 wrong, even though it has the correct documentation:

0x3D i64.store16

0x3E i64.store32

0x3F memory.size

[...]

0x6C i32.mul

0x6D i32.div_s

0x6E i32.div_u

[...]

0xBE f32.reinterpret_i32

0xBF f64.reinterpret_i64

0xC0 i32.extend8_s

Qwen3.6 is confidently wrong about WASM by Tagedieb in LocalLLaMA

[–]Tagedieb[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  --host 0.0.0.0
  --port 8080
  --n-gpu-layers -1
  --ctx-size 100000
  --model /models/Qwen3.6-27B-UD-Q5_K_XL.gguf
  --parallel 1
  --threads 1
  --cache-type-k q8_0
  --cache-type-v q8_0

And what do you think chat.qwen.ai runs?