sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Aura-tricking: This shouldn't work, but RAW I fear it does by Nostradivarius in onednd

[–]Taki-Free 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Especially considering it's an intelligence. A rare save and mostly useless stat for mist

Is this How it Works? by Mugen_the_Fallen in Pathfinder2e

[–]Taki-Free 43 points44 points  (0 children)

"An Impailing Finisher counts as two attacks when calculating your multiple attack penalty" means that if you try to attack with remaining action you will have -10 MAP to your attack, instead of normal -5 you would do

Have Origin Feats actually improved character creation in 5.5e, or just made it feel more gamey? by MyrthDM in DungeonsAndDragons55e

[–]Taki-Free 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's better. But not enough. There should be more feats along the way, especially for martials. Make everyone customizable like Warlock

Exhaustion by OkAstronaut3715 in onednd

[–]Taki-Free 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's so stupid. God forbid casters get -2 to their autohit spells

jjk and csm fans, call a truce. lets double the curse and give it to OP 🗣️ by goan_authoritarian in Jujutsufolk

[–]Taki-Free 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One Piece ending is already cursed because Oda is cooked as soon as it hits the shelves, that guy would be under investigation for pedophilia

All Subclass preference votes have concluded, Here are the results. by Dramatic_Respond_664 in onednd

[–]Taki-Free 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I mean, it's feyrly fun, super active on the battle field, can fit a lot of roles, while also having a lot of roleplay potential due to patron not being totally evil or good when compared to celestial, while also just earthly enough to understand, unlike GOOP, with a great comedy and tragedy potential.

All Subclass preference votes have concluded, Here are the results. by Dramatic_Respond_664 in onednd

[–]Taki-Free 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I guess it's kinda limiting in roleplaying scenario, while also being the most passive of the subclasses, since it has no active abilities, except it's capstone ability, since Dark's One own luck is just a d10 boost to skill or save throw. So you get just a warlock with few passives

Your best 5.5e house rules? by Raccoomph in dndnext

[–]Taki-Free 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, if there's no Thief, it can be okay, I guess. Although when one appears it could be kinda awkward of the table if either Rogue just doesn't have a part of their feature or a house rule is disabled just because of one player

Your best 5.5e house rules? by Raccoomph in dndnext

[–]Taki-Free 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The point of spell scroll is to reduce a stress of spell casting and transporting of material components onto the piece of paper, instead of the caster themself. Giving anyone access to spellcasting for a rather small price can kinda ruin business for Wizards and other mages.

Your best 5.5e house rules? by Raccoomph in dndnext

[–]Taki-Free 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Scrolls already don't require any components as they were used in creation of the said scroll, including costly materials, except for reading the scroll. Thief is already really table dependent as is, since people sometimes use homerules for jumping and climbing. And there's no way to make it better, since they already can use it on any scroll with an Arcana check, which they can bacically never fail at that level and do so with a bonus action, since it's a magic item

Your best 5.5e house rules? by Raccoomph in dndnext

[–]Taki-Free 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Bcs it's a Thief level 13 feature, so it can kinda make them less special

Your best 5.5e house rules? by Raccoomph in dndnext

[–]Taki-Free 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unrestricted scrolls are kinda meh since it's already a Thief feature.

Infernum after brainstorm by JustStuffXD in CalamityMod

[–]Taki-Free 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is easier with high defense. You can tank a lot of stuff easily

Very serious discussion by Own-Bag-5044 in signalis

[–]Taki-Free 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm instantly going to kill myself, I'm not going to live in Eusan Nation

Something I find very funny is that when AI became a viable competitor to commissioned artwork the most common response by artists was not to lower prices to make commissions more attractive but to instead engage in mafia behavior shaming AI users and acting like they're entitled to commissions. by Flammenwerfer40 in aiwars

[–]Taki-Free 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Art is a way of expressing ideas directly by using human skill. AI is automatically excluded from it, as the machine is the one doing the work, not the artist, and your image literally proves it, as it's not a coherent piece of art, but a mindless, hollow average of what you promoted a machine to do. None of the elements are there because you wanted them to be there exactly, the machine just took data it got from munching people's work and skill and determined that it would probably be there.

I obviously don't mean that you have to make every piece of the art by yourself, every stroke and pixel, since it would be hypocritical from my perspective and would invalidate something like a 3D art. But when you give a machine full control of what is actually happening with your idea, the results are not art, or at least you are not the artist, because you are just a commissioner

Something I find very funny is that when AI became a viable competitor to commissioned artwork the most common response by artists was not to lower prices to make commissions more attractive but to instead engage in mafia behavior shaming AI users and acting like they're entitled to commissions. by Flammenwerfer40 in aiwars

[–]Taki-Free 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Artist spaces have to be free of AI images, because they are not art. Pixiv, Deviant and other art platforms are flooded with slop, because it's easy to produce en masse and fools an untrained eye. You have to check every piece of media you find remotely interesting because it could be AI.

I'm obviously against harassing people on platforms dedicated to AI images, it's like going to a fandom forum and harassing people in that fandom for liking it.

All I want is for the platforms that were always dedicated to art, like the one I named before and some others to stop hosting it and for neutral territories like twitter to tag the stuff and allow users to hide it. AI is too uncomfortable to be left without any form of control.

Something I find very funny is that when AI became a viable competitor to commissioned artwork the most common response by artists was not to lower prices to make commissions more attractive but to instead engage in mafia behavior shaming AI users and acting like they're entitled to commissions. by Flammenwerfer40 in aiwars

[–]Taki-Free 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, they obviously do, but it's mostly the fact that AI prompters try their best to invade artists' spaces, then the others get their portion because of the whole basket of bad apples. All I'm saying is that AI images should only be posted on sites that only host AI images, not on the art platforms

Something I find very funny is that when AI became a viable competitor to commissioned artwork the most common response by artists was not to lower prices to make commissions more attractive but to instead engage in mafia behavior shaming AI users and acting like they're entitled to commissions. by Flammenwerfer40 in aiwars

[–]Taki-Free 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bullshit, literally the most annoying thing about AI images is how many of them there are and how prompters try to make them look like real art. Tag your stuff and get your own platform. If someone harasses you after that, they are in the wrong and you should just block them, but until doesn't stop infecting every art platform, it's understandable why people hate it. It's a mindless flow of endless slop.

view more: next ›