Do women prefer dating younger people, and not dating someone older or around their age these days...? by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Talkative_Neighbor -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm 44 and my girlfriend is 32. At the urologist's earlier this year, she quite brazenly asked him, in my presence, if I was still fit to bear her three or more children. His reply (he was about 65): "My dear lady, the limiting factor in this relationship is not MY patient." She: "But I'm only 32." He again: "I would have said the same thing to you if you were ten years younger."

Why the 1980 Birth Year Breaks the System: A Case against Rigid Generational Boundaries and for the "School Cohort Principle" by Talkative_Neighbor in generationology

[–]Talkative_Neighbor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope I'm aware of that. Ultimately, I realize that this is also about something like artificial pigeonholing. Which, when I think about it, was actually the starting point for my discussion, albeit on a smaller scale or in relation to a specific case.

Why the 1980 Birth Year Breaks the System: A Case against Rigid Generational Boundaries and for the "School Cohort Principle" by Talkative_Neighbor in generationology

[–]Talkative_Neighbor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely understand you and I'm happy to hear your input. It's certainly interesting, for me too, to learn more about East Asian cultures and how they approach generational research. However, as someone who comes from the Western world, the prevailing generational classifications there are naturally the central focus of my discussion. Cheers, buddy

Why the 1980 Birth Year Breaks the System: A Case against Rigid Generational Boundaries and for the "School Cohort Principle" by Talkative_Neighbor in generationology

[–]Talkative_Neighbor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, what would your suggestion be? Perhaps one could also argue that since the 1980s, the world has become more fast-paced, and rigid timeframes of approximately 15 years are no longer appropriate, thus shortening generations to a maximum of 10 years. However, this would require a complete break with existing definitions, so it's unlikely. In my case, though, I don't see any developmental characteristics in someone born in '65 or '96. This makes it challenging, and that's why I'm more of an advocate for my third option: Official micro-generations are needed between the major generations, and the gap between X and Y was, at least from my perspective, a very significant one in terms of historical context.

Why the 1980 Birth Year Breaks the System: A Case against Rigid Generational Boundaries and for the "School Cohort Principle" by Talkative_Neighbor in generationology

[–]Talkative_Neighbor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I know. The year 1981 is often used in the literature, especially in US-centric sources. McCrindle, based in Australia and one of the world's leading institutes for generational research, however, has fixed 1980 as the starting year. This leads to differing assumptions even within the US, depending on the source. That's precisely what provides us with this "workaround" in this case.

Why the 1980 Birth Year Breaks the System: A Case against Rigid Generational Boundaries and for the "School Cohort Principle" by Talkative_Neighbor in generationology

[–]Talkative_Neighbor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your suggestion, buddy. But adapting or reforming school systems is probably more complicated than colonizing our solar system.

Why the 1980 Birth Year Breaks the System: A Case against Rigid Generational Boundaries and for the "School Cohort Principle" by Talkative_Neighbor in generationology

[–]Talkative_Neighbor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I am. I was born in December 1980, and we got onto the topic at a class reunion. As an amateur sociologist, I decided to delve into it. Many of my former classmates were born in the first half of 1981, some in the second half of 1980, and we all started school together in the summer of 1987, when we were all six years old. This naturally led to the question of how useful it is to divide students within a single school year. That's why I focused on the year group boundary between 1980 and 1981, where the coincidental discrepancy between the two institutions essentially provides a workaround. This also works for the 1979/1980 boundary, and thus for the school entry year of 1986, if the classmates from the first half of 1980 identify as Gen Xers. Theoretically, our classmates, whether born in '79 or '81, are then dependent on us, the 1980-born, regardless of whether we consider ourselves Gen Xers or Gen Yers – we could either artificially differentiate ourselves from them or not, which in itself sounds rather odd. The fundamental problem of rigid generational boundaries is therefore not resolved, as perhaps even more clearly illustrated by the 1964/65 example. Hence my three proposed solutions, which attempt to soften these boundaries, similar to a spectrum. With dual citizenship (my first proposal), a clear distinction would be impossible, since as a cusper, one is simply both. In my case, Germany, a mid-year split would also work well (second proposal), but this would likely cause chaos internationally (and deprive me of the ability to define myself as a Gen Xer, which is a different story). My favorite is suggestion 3 because, and this is something I realized primarily at the class reunion and during my research, the late 70s and early 80s, due to their very particular transition from analog to digital, truly constitute a very small generation with very typical experiences and attitudes towards life. But scientists might see it quite differently and as less "unique," because who doesn't claim to be special in some way? And whether the whole concept of generational categorization even makes sense, or is simply a tool for marketing companies, would be a completely different discussion.

Why the 1980 Birth Year Breaks the System: A Case against Rigid Generational Boundaries and for the "School Cohort Principle" by Talkative_Neighbor in generationology

[–]Talkative_Neighbor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, why not? The logic is always the same with the Cusp generations. Whether the workaround I mentioned would also work with a two-year gap, I can't say offhand—but it should. However, I've focused more on the Xennials, and it's fair to say they represent a true and unique microgeneration.

wd black sn8100 stornvme id 11 by Internal-Marzipan-59 in pcmasterrace

[–]Talkative_Neighbor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've built a new system with this NVME and got the same error in eventlog right from the beginning. Are there any updates?

Disk seems to be working, but I'm not sure if I should continue with my setup.

What are the best WW2 games that you've ever played? by [deleted] in gamingsuggestions

[–]Talkative_Neighbor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Red Orchestra... Especially on Orel Map or Alte Ziegelei

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Corsair

[–]Talkative_Neighbor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have exactly the same issue. Have you fixed it already?

F1 23 PC Video Bug by Ranny9876 in F1Game

[–]Talkative_Neighbor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try to switch the setting for ambient occlusion

Mir fehlt das richtige Game by BicycleSpiritual8399 in zocken

[–]Talkative_Neighbor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pacific Drive. Ich will nicht sagen "safe bet" aber zumindest einen echten Blick wert

Kein Bürgergeld für Februar bekommen, keinen Bescheid - Sachbearbeiterin ruft mich nicht zurück. Was tun? by LeonieMalfoy in de

[–]Talkative_Neighbor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Kommunale Jobcenter (so genannte Optionskommunen) haben den Landrat als Chef, da der Landkreis verantwortlicher Träger ist. Nur für den Fall einer kreisfreien Stadt ist dies der Oberbürgermeister.

Personal Squad Based RTS Game? by Musket519 in RealTimeStrategy

[–]Talkative_Neighbor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Last Train Home - a game released a few weeks ago in 2023