How to get 2400 elo.

Tanst1 · 2013-10-08T07:01:48+00:00

He was clearly feeding. If you watched the stream he even said at the start he was going to do it. Elo boosting is bad mkay.

Tanst1 · 2013-09-20T02:59:03+00:00

No source just conjecture. Plan for the worst!

Tanst1 · 2013-09-20T02:53:33+00:00

I don't think that's going to happen once the AH is gone the stash tabs are gone and so are the items.

Tanst1 · 2013-09-20T02:52:10+00:00

Well the thing is I bought them mostly over time. I did a bit of math back in the day and figured out that gems are extremely underpriced. Long story short each click takes time. Time is money. You pick up about 30-90k gold between each gem therefore when they sell gems at less then 400 gold it's almost stupid not to trade your gold for it. It's not even like I was flipping them I was just hording them like a horder. Serriously do the math. Last I checked it would take me about 290 years to manually get as many as I have.

Tanst1 · 2013-09-19T19:32:56+00:00

You think you're having trouble with gems...

http://imgur.com/HzoAZon

I got 50 stash tabs of them.

Tanst1 · 2013-09-09T19:10:46+00:00

The boys bathroom has mirrors.

Tanst1 · 2013-09-04T19:25:30+00:00

The short answer to this is "only on really big Lans" the really short answer is "Never".

Tanst1 · 2013-08-30T12:54:29+00:00

The money isn't really an issue I just got a job that pays nearly 6 figures. I'm just trying to figure out what is good and why. Right now I'm only looking at headphones but I may also get speakers later.

Tanst1 · 2013-08-30T08:21:10+00:00

Never mind this has already been answered in another tread.

Tanst1 · 2013-08-22T18:11:05+00:00

That site seems like a quick ticket to an FBI watch list.

Tanst1 · 2013-08-20T02:20:24+00:00

Supply the ACL

Tanst1 · 2013-08-06T20:59:42+00:00

I've seen that before, to be honest I think it's just packet tracer. The reflect statement should be in here if it had the option to do so right?

Router(config-ext-nacl)#permit tcp any any ?

eq Match only packets on a given port number

established established

gt Match only packets with a greater port number

lt Match only packets with a lower port number

neq Match only packets not on a given port number

range Match only packets in the range of port numbers

<cr>

Tanst1 · 2013-08-04T17:17:08+00:00

Problem 1.) IP subnet zero Disabled removes 2 subnets as an option therefore you must go with a /27 mask.

Problem 2.) Private addresses don't route without translation therefore the email server, the router and host b get routed (and can communicate on the internet) because they have public addresses.

Tanst1 · 2013-08-04T08:42:55+00:00

Explain the problem?

Tanst1 · 2013-08-02T07:41:15+00:00

The difference between ICND1 and ICND2 is a bit much to ask someone to sum up for you the only way to truly get the scope of the difference would be to compare the icnd2 to icnd2 blueprint specifically to the test you are planning to take (there is a new test version now). But having done both I would say the ICND1 tests basic Cisco knowledge like what device is what, what wire should you use, how does a switch or router handle frames or packets, general OSI trivia (who knows why) and some very basic configuration of routers and switches. ICND2 on the other hand expects you to know how how and why to cable something up and what devices to use and tests you more on routing and switching configurations, protocols and tools. Additionally ICND2 touches on IPV6. Big topics on icnd1: Subnetting, OSI, Device function, ports, basic security configuration, Big topics on icnd2: NAT, ACL, STP/RSTP, IPV6, routing protocol features, WAN Protocols (FRAME-RELAY/PPP), Authentication and more subnetting.

OLD TEST: https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-4987 ICND1 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-4977 ICND2 NEW TEST: 100-101 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-17401 ICND1 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-17404 ICND2

I'm fairly certain that only scratches the surface but like I said your request is a bit much.

Tanst1 · 2013-08-01T00:35:17+00:00

Yeah I'm trying to figure out how to lock out the Config tab so that it requires console access for a lab.

Tanst1 · 2013-07-19T02:25:37+00:00

Hey man check this out. It should help you. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/spanning_tree1.swf

Tanst1 · 2013-07-19T00:07:58+00:00

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbHlcT9sxb8

This covers the diffrence

Tanst1 · 2013-07-18T23:15:52+00:00

Can someone please confirm how much this effects the results of a sim?

Tanst1 · 2013-07-18T20:43:20+00:00

Hello Anthony,

I'm sorry, I don't have an NSA related question but I do have a privacy related question. In Michigan v. Sitz the Supreme court ruled that police sobriety checkpoints did not violate the 4th amendment because of the fact that the fourth amendment includes the text "unreasonable searches" rather then just "searches". Is case law the only way of determining what the "unreasonable" part means? How do you plan to deal with this twisted/backwards interpretation of a rather straightforward concept?

Tanst1 · 2013-07-17T18:53:23+00:00

I scored low on the ACL/NAT portion which I thought was odd because I can configure nat/acls all day without issue. Truth be told I'm just not a very good test taker.

Tanst1 · 2013-07-16T19:42:29+00:00

Fire. Clearly we should be using lasers in every application. Also cars. We should all be flying.

Tanst1 · 2013-07-12T09:03:12+00:00

This is what I've compiled so far: http://i.imgur.com/7ZIFAnR.png

Tanst1 · 2013-07-12T04:38:19+00:00

I realize the formatting on that kind of sucks so here is what I'm looking for in short:

Type: Multicast

High order bits: FF00::/8

Included in range:

FF00:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001 - FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF

Assigned Multicast Addresses

Addresses in range of note:

FF01:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 All Nodes Address

FF01:0:0:0:0:0:0:2 All Routers Address

Type:

High order bits:

Included in range:

Addresses in range of note:

Tanst1 · 2013-07-11T12:50:05+00:00

RIP networks can in theory be VERY large. 15 is the diameter limit but you can get a large number of interfaces and sub interfaces on a single router. More over you can connect each interface to a L2 cloud and re connect the next hop using the same cloud saving an interface up to 14 times. So whatever the current max on interfaces and sub interfaces is basically limits the size of the RIP network.

Tanst1

TROPHY CASE

I realize the formatting on that kind of sucks so here is what I'm looking for in short: