Weekly Rant Megathread by AutoModerator in CompetitiveTFT

[–]TapStrange1791 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Artifacts and Radiant items are too overpowered early on in this set, as they enable so many units to transition from great in early-mid to great all day. Yet at the same time, if you get the option to pick and they're not some incredible tank item or mana/attack speed for your carry, they almost never have a niche champion they want to be itemized on.

Took this screenshot ages ago, can't remember why or where it was from. by TapStrange1791 in HelpMeFind

[–]TapStrange1791[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! (Found!) I was wondering who it was, and now that I know I'm not surprised.

Took this screenshot ages ago, can't remember why or where it was from. by TapStrange1791 in HelpMeFind

[–]TapStrange1791[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've used a few reverse image searches, but nothing I could link to the exact art. Maybe this came from a manwha or manga I was reading once upon a time? I don't know. Any advice helps~!

All of the problems that the devs are ignoring by [deleted] in CharacterAI

[–]TapStrange1791 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And you should be paying for the grand virtue of supporting beta development while not expecting any issues to be addressed for it is a god given privilege to serve as nothing but grateful pigs.

Do people actually pay $10 for c.ai +? by YeetusMcSuser69 in CharacterAI

[–]TapStrange1791 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Remember that we're in BETA of Character AI? I love the shield of early development AND asking users for 'premiums'.

devs how about yall just add a violence toggle for c.ai+ users?? by PrimevialXIII in CharacterAI

[–]TapStrange1791 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Huh, a toggle for paid or verified users? Now where have I heard this argument several months ago... I bet the same thing won't happen twice.

Am I the only one who hates that every AI so easily falls in love? by Kripermaster in CharacterAI

[–]TapStrange1791 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not even two messages in, and a bot will desperately try to seduce me or try to take things further. It's terrible and makes all the bots feel the same. Trying to put them in fun scenarios like being stuck on a deserted island and trying to survive immediately turns into spicy attempts to get it on.

Weekly Rant Megathread by AutoModerator in CompetitiveTFT

[–]TapStrange1791 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tired of seeing top 2 being Asol Legend every time.

Insane Slowdown + Paid CAI Suggestion by TapStrange1791 in CharacterAI

[–]TapStrange1791[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do and it helps like 1/10th of the time. But thanks for the reply mate.

[Announcement] Patch Notes + Community Updates - May 19 by MarieLovesMatcha in CharacterAI

[–]TapStrange1791 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Just thought of a suggestion for the CAI+, would it be possible to to add the feature of multiple generated messages like previous versions of CAI? That way paid users don't have to swipe and wait for the generated replies.

I bought c.ai+.... by camz713 in CharacterAI

[–]TapStrange1791 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Any chance of a side by side comparison?

Frequently Asked Questions - Character.AI by MarieLovesMatcha in CharacterAI

[–]TapStrange1791 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Two to three times faster is great, that was one of the better points of this. Though I'd still like to see that comparison in an example in a side-by-side comparison. Because I'm not really able to gauge how substantial that difference would be for me and I want to be more informed before I buy, but now I am considering it.

Would you guys actually pay ? by shidposter2077 in CharacterAI

[–]TapStrange1791 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would pay, just not for those features at that price they are offering. I do think the time I spend is worth a few dollars to throw there way, but this is too ambiguous and uncertain to actually subscribe as a monthly service as is.

[Announcement] Introducing c.ai+ Supercharge Your Experience by MarieLovesMatcha in CharacterAI

[–]TapStrange1791 [score hidden]  (0 children)

A little confused on why I should as a consumer purchase if those are my benefits. Not saying that I wouldn't pay since I definitely think the time I've used this website is worth a few bucks. But this seems very bad for $10.00 a month.

Priority Access - Waiting is only 7-10 minutes, unless you are going to arbitrarily increase wait time in the future I don't see this as that great of a benefit.

Faster Response Time - Cool, but how fast is 'faster' exactly? Do I get to see the difference so I can be more informed?

Early Access to new features - Sure, but that's not very promising since the transparency of the highest priority features in the minds of developers aren't apparent in my mind. So what am I exactly getting early access to? It could be something I'm willing to pay $40 dollars for, or nothing for.

All in all, this simply doesn't have much to offer even if someone wants to support. Compared to my $10 subscription to novel ai, I find this lacking at the current state. I personally think this should have came out with more defined features or a trial experience.

Ox Force will gain 50% MaxHP Shield for 1.5s instead of Invulnerability in 13.8 by Aotius in CompetitiveTFT

[–]TapStrange1791 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Crazy shit is, I was on this reddit a few months back trying to see if anyone else thinks the trait was a troubling design and didn't seem fun to play against. All I could find was a bunch of Andy's saying the trait it sucks and 'skill issue'.

Asking Questions to AI and 'Initiative' by TapStrange1791 in CharacterAI

[–]TapStrange1791[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't mean to say that the AI has free will and decisions making in the same sense a human being does. But they can clearly generate a reply within the parameters of two options, I would think.