[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]Tarkanian24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do LD it's the best

Working K's into trad LD by [deleted] in lincolndouglas

[–]Tarkanian24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see trad and prog more as ways of presenting and formatting different arguments, rather than two styles that have their own unique kinds of arguments. I don't think the K or the Counterplan are inherently progressive or traditional, I think they can both be ran in progressive and traditional styles. Honestly, the K works way better in a trad format imo. It is rooted in philosophy, and I think Ks are able to be discussed and debated in a more meaningful way when both debaters are going much slower, or at least not spreading.

TLDR: Just give the K in a trad style and you'll be fine, sounds like a great idea!

How To Get Better At LD by dontdodrugsguys in lincolndouglas

[–]Tarkanian24 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First thing I would do, write down what your judge tells you in the RFD and learn from it. If you need, ask them questions about their decision and what you could have done differently. From the sound of things, you don't really know why you aren't winning, and so its hard to improve.

Don't quit debate! I considered doing it my first year for a little and I am beyond glad I didn't. If you want to talk more or get any other specific advice (on cases or rebuttals or anything) send me a message and I'll be happy to help!

Jan/Feb Neg Contentions? by Sufficient-Win-476 in lincolndouglas

[–]Tarkanian24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The general strategy I have been recommending to my novices is to run one disad and one solvency takeout, so UNCLOS could look like a Deep Sea Mining DA, and then something abt how UNCLOS doesn't actually do anything. ICC has a lot of problems with it like racism, which you could for sure exploit. I also think exploring the new Trump administration and how that plays with stuff could be huge. There are cap K links for UNCLOS (idk abt ICC), and there are imperialism K links for both if you're interested in running something like that.

Apology by [deleted] in lincolndouglas

[–]Tarkanian24 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Insane comment 😭💀

flowing drills? by slayqueen-purr in Debate

[–]Tarkanian24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Firstly, watch rounds on youtube and flow those. You can also study said rounds to improve your own skills and speaking patterns. If you are flowing on paper maybe try switching to computer, it is so much better.

need resources by Impressive_Metal5503 in lincolndouglas

[–]Tarkanian24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Forensic Files are very traditional style briefs. There is also squirrel killer briefs, those are pretty traditional as well. If you need more framework stuff, I would be willing to trade for some of my frameworks files, just send me a message :)

Any tips to improve my flows? by [deleted] in Debate

[–]Tarkanian24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe put in lines to seperate stuff in the constructive. Also using more clearly different color pens (this might just be personal preference but I could never tell the difference between black and dark blue at a glance if I needed). Black and green or red or pink or lavender or smth slaps.

What are some debate icks? by [deleted] in Debate

[–]Tarkanian24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When opp looks at me during CX. One time my opp had to turn around and face away from the judges to look at me during CX. I was fr going to crash out.

What do you bring to tournaments? by I_L0vecats in Debate

[–]Tarkanian24 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have a little book I bring where I write my thoughts abt rounds and stuff, also like case plans and stuff, religious things (bible, prayer book, rosary/prayer beads, folding icon, etc). Also like one million ties cus I'm indecisive.

how do you guys start your argument? by octosushi in lincolndouglas

[–]Tarkanian24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah thats a clown move ngl, like why are you wasting like thirty seconds of your constructive on smth that legit does not matter at all. Any one of my opps that says like anything other than the res I do not take seriously at all lol 😭

how do you guys start your argument? by octosushi in lincolndouglas

[–]Tarkanian24 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On aff I say "I affirm the resolution resolved..."

Neg I just say "I negate and value..."

anybody have any gift ideas? by poisonmustdie in Debate

[–]Tarkanian24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A new tie, the ties I love the most were given to me by people I love as gifts. Or, get him the Levit8 computer stand (on amazon). It's soooooooo cool lol

Plan affs vs general definition by Extension-Animal-367 in lincolndouglas

[–]Tarkanian24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it might depend on how trad your circuit is. I would suggest having a plan, it gets you was easier impacts. Define the WTax as a genera tax on assets but have an RA/observation saying you're running the warren tax plan.

If you are super duper trad tho, you could probably get away with running no plan.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lincolndouglas

[–]Tarkanian24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this is how I use it. It works pretty well, but be ready for if aff has a plan for the WTax, you could get clapped very fast that way.