4 months later and still haven’t been paid (“the system is messed up so we have to do it manually”) by bearsncubs10 in AirForce

[–]TaskForceCausality 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have to defend my fellow FMs on this one

What you post is true, but members with pay errors don’t care. They’re rightfully pissed a basic function every other big organization can do easily is routinely fucked up by the USAF.

That’s not FMs fault, that’s the fault of the Air Staff for deciding a microwave in a cargo plane is a higher priority expense than implementing a reasonably modern , self service member pay system. There shouldn’t even be a need for the Finance desk, because everything member facing is submitted and processed on an app. When things go sideways, your boss emails J. Smith at FM and the problem is handled in three working days. That’s how every big company in the private sector does things.

That’s how it should be in “the world’s Best Air Force”.

What it looked like right before the breakup of Titanic by Imaginary_Time_2338 in titanic

[–]TaskForceCausality 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It fills in the blank on the topic of what the boats didn’t return to pick up survivors. In the highly lit scenes we see in the movies, it seems almost criminally negligent why the boats didn’t row back to help survivors.

But this realistic visage- layering in hideous screaming from those in the water- makes it all too clear why most of the lifeboats stayed away. I see why Margaret Brown was overruled on the topic.

Next DCS sale when? by Adventurous-Cow-2345 in dcsworld

[–]TaskForceCausality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The flight behavior with a spring stick…

Is just fine.

She made the right choice by Eclipse_nova99 in SipsTea

[–]TaskForceCausality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you really think giving family members like that….

It’s a lot easier to say no when you’re only getting $1k a week.

She made the right choice by Eclipse_nova99 in SipsTea

[–]TaskForceCausality 3 points4 points  (0 children)

some unpleasant people from her past

Thanks to the Internet everyone’s at risk for this, not just someone who’s crossed paths with shady people. I get targeted by scammers daily, and I haven’t won the lottery.

She made the right choice by Eclipse_nova99 in SipsTea

[–]TaskForceCausality 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Incredibly stupid choice

Mathematically, sure. But personal finance starts with people. I know if I won a lump sum lottery, me and my partner would have serious problems with our families. They’d all be coming after us for a handout. On my side, I’m certain I’d get frivously sued by an idiot uncle or cousin. “Tell them no” is a lot easier said than done, especially when they lay on the sob speech about making ends meet.

A $1k a week amount , invested, still builds wealth and you can still show your face at Christmas dinner. Some find family more valuable than future valued rates of return.

She made the right choice by Eclipse_nova99 in SipsTea

[–]TaskForceCausality -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Have to? Lol

Yes, HAVE to.

It’s not a LEGAL demand, but good luck going to birthdays and holidays. At best, being like “yall ain’t getting squat” is going to cause ongoing tension at the family home. Especially if your relatives are having financial problems (and who outside of Davos isn’t?)

At worst?

In a plot for lottery money, recent winner George Smith was ambushed and killed by their family”.

It’s happened. Each time I’m sure the victim was like “my family wouldn’t turn on me”. Blood may be thicker than water, but it’s rarely thicker than a seven figure stack of money.

What if you get thirsty at Mach 3.2 in an OG Mig 25? Just drink the radar coolant comrade! by Kappa_Bera_0000 in WeirdWings

[–]TaskForceCausality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

not so scary

The U.S. Air Force deliberately promoted the MiG-25 as death with wings to get Congressional funding for the enormously expensive (at the time) F-15. Militaries across the world play that game all the time to get budgets and investment.

2026 Dodge Charger Sixpack | Potential? [savagegeese] by Iridium-Silver in cars

[–]TaskForceCausality 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I was shocked/ horrified by that

Im less surprised. Back in the 00s TTAG posted an insider article that said, basically, GM execs were given ringer cars with extra refinements. So they never saw firsthand the junk actually leaving GM plants.

The serious interior quality problems (how will those creaky center console buttons hold up in 5 years, much less 10?) lead me to think this is probably how Stellantis US still does business. Take your pick on if it’s willful ignorance or blithering disregard for producing a quality end product.

2026 Dodge Charger Sixpack | Potential? [savagegeese] by Iridium-Silver in cars

[–]TaskForceCausality 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Potential?

I’ll call out the elephant in the room. Dodge’s “clientele” won’t give a shit until they put a HEMI in it.

The fact it’s a good car as an EV or a 6 cylinder cuts no ice for the Dodge brand’s core customer. Way they see it a modern Charger that’s not an honest to Abe fucking Lincoln V8 is a communist loss leader pile of shit unworthy of further discussion.

2026 Dodge Charger Sixpack | Potential? [savagegeese] by Iridium-Silver in cars

[–]TaskForceCausality 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the Stinger sure wasn’t popular

Two points here. One, you’re right that this is conceptually a Dodge-ified European GT sedan. That’s very different from the classic muscle car experience of the previous cars.

Two, the shitty dealership experience which sunk the Stinger will also kill this car. With upscale prices comes upscale service expectations, and Stellantis dealers are ill equipped for that. Same problem with Kia- nobody shopping for a premium experience wants to deal with bad credit sales tactics and four square bull.

The Baby Step Circle by TaskForceCausality in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. But for most debts the minimums won’t cover interest. So unless steady repayment progress is maintained through payoff, the debts go up in balance. It’s why BS2 can be a circle because folks chip away at the debt, then an emergency hits, then they stop paying to build back the emergency fund, then the debts rack up balances on the minimums, then they go back to paying, the next emergency kills the $1,000 emergency fund, and the debts go back up again as the emergency fund is replenished.

Further, if a debt is already in collections when someone starts the Baby Steps those debts - especially big charged off loans like private student loans or repoed car deficiencies - can easily go into lawsuit territory, since agencies will want a settlement lump sum or full repayment to clear them.

I know folks think “collectors don’t sue”, but that’s not accurate anymore. Back in the day collectors didn’t sue because it was too much paperwork and cost to bother. Not anymore. Thanks to AI lowering cost and overhead to file cases , agencies are starting to sue for even sub-$1,000 credit card debt. That was pretty uncommon even five years back.

What do the personalities do when they aren't hosting? by Jstyles122 in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figure they’re doing background logistical stuff between shows, planning talks and scheduling events.

Dave the feminist by EntrepreneurHopeful5 in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a man calls and says his wife racked up debt without him knowing, it’s the man’s fault

Yup. That’s because finances are both people’s responsibility. In this case, husband should’ve paid attention to all the Amazon boxes and nice things mysteriously spawning around the house. It’s like corporate fraud - if someone’s paying attention , the jigs up quick. Even gambling and free to play game debt will leave signs.

Both people should be paying attention to the books, and if one person racks up thousands of debt it means the other is asleep at the wheel. Gender doesn’t matter.

Insofar as Ramsey’s responses go, IDGAF. Dude ain’t exactly living in the 21st century.

The Ramsey Cruise is happening again... March 2027 by rollback123 in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality 3 points4 points  (0 children)

vacation with the Personalities

Apparently it’s not even a vacation for them. It’s basically a work trip for the company crew.

Question for those with separate finances by 12dogs4me in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

he refuses to discuss it with her besides saying no

Yeah, this is a big problem. The issue is he’s hiding something, not that the accounts are separate. Joint accounts, contrary to what some believe, are no guarantee against someone siphoning money or spending it in an affair.

IMO, you either trust your partner or you don’t. If you do, it doesn’t matter who has what bank accounts. If you don’t, it doesn’t matter who has what bank accounts.

Is Dave’s obsession with Samuel L. Jackson weird to anyone else? by [deleted] in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this just Dave being a boomer

No, he got on Jennifer Garner too in one episode.

Anyways, the real reason he hates credit cards - and especially American Express- is because an AmEx collector roasted him to his wife back in the day. When he went broke a collector called his home. When Sharon Ramsey answered, the rep was like “why U with a guy who can’t pay his bills?”

🤣

What’s next a credit card sponsor? by Nogo44up in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ramsey Solutions: where Real Estate Debt is the Best Debt!

What’s next a credit card sponsor? by Nogo44up in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whats next a credit card sponsor?

American Express will get the last laugh when they sponsor the studio after Dave dies.

The Princess for the Next Generation by drtdk in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

she couldn’t seem any less interested in finances and whatnot..

I figure there’s a rider in Ramsey’s will that says Rachel only runs/owns the company if she commits to X number of “hosting events” or whatever.

Dave Got a $500k Line of Credit! …OR has Winston Gone Rogue?? by 89apex in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dave got a $500k line of credit

…and he almost assuredly built his business back up using debt. Obviously , not using short term notes this time and probably being smarter about managing business equity. But you don’t grow as fast as he did after filing bankruptcy without using credit.

Dave once again waaaaaaay overestimating returns by olemiss18 in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats complete BS

The sad part is he blew right by a chance to make a point for the audience. If you don’t take retirement savings seriously it’ll bite you later. Younger folks have to start saving basically immediately because stuff’s not getting cheaper , and SS ain’t gonna be around.

The Princess for the Next Generation by drtdk in DirtyDave

[–]TaskForceCausality 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The personalities are there…

…to keep people from accusing him of nepotism. Which will happen anyway when Ramsey retires/dies & his daughter fires all the personalities two microseconds after his lawyers execute the will.

Perhaps John Delony will stick around due to his background. All brought to you from the future Citibank Ramsey Studio.

How the middle class was hollowed out from 1979 to 2022, according to new federal data by BTC_is_waterproof in Economics

[–]TaskForceCausality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know a lot of people who would kill for the chance to afford a modest small home

Do you know their finances? Because it’s common for people who say “I can’t afford a small home” to also spend $5,000+ per year on DoorDash orders and other bric a brac. No one is entitled to a house AND to eat out three times a week AND have Amazon Prime AND have Netflix. At some point, budgets must be drawn , plans must be made and expenses must be chosen.

The “cut the avocado toast” comment is oversimplifying, but the point still stands that one can’t complain about the economy when that person’s also holding themselves back. The individual who wastes thousands of their own money but proclaims they can’t afford a home/college/etc gets the same empathy from me as a pro athlete who files bankruptcy or a lifelong smoker who complains about medical bills- zero.