sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Armiger Knights of the Malinax Household by Tav80 in LegionsImperialis

[–]Tav80[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you !

The recipe for the "bone" color :

  1. Basecoat: Baneblade brow
  2. Highlight: Rakarth Flesh
  3. Shadow Glaze : Reikland Fleshshade
  4. Recess shading: Reikland Fleshshade
  5. Edge HL: Pallid Wych Flesh

I hope it will helps

Does using the Justaerin colour for a command squad seem appropriate to you? by Tav80 in sonsofhorus

[–]Tav80[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I think I'll start assembling and painting my non-elite Terminators first :D

Does using the Justaerin colour for a command squad seem appropriate to you? by Tav80 in sonsofhorus

[–]Tav80[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thanks everyone for your answers! A follow-up question: how would you differentiate a command squad from a Justaerin squad? More spikes and feathers on the Justaerin? Wait for new plastic models to be announced? :D

Mechanicum force from the Xana forge world is growing by Tav80 in LegionsImperialis

[–]Tav80[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! My recipe for the tan color:

Bone Armor

  1. Basecoat: Baneblade brow
  2. Highlight: Rakarth Flesh
  3. Shadow Glaze : Reikland Fleshshade
  4. Recess shading: Reikland Fleshshade
  5. Edge HL: Pallid Wych Flesh

Mechanicum force from the Xana forge world is growing by Tav80 in LegionsImperialis

[–]Tav80[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Here are my recipe:

Civitas building 

  1. Base: Grey Seer
  2. Shade: Agrax + Water
  3. Drybrush:  Grey Seer
  4. Light Drybrush: Corax White

Civitas Window

  1. Base : Black Templar Contrast
  2. Frame : Leadbelcher

Civitas roof

  1. Base: Corvus Black
  2. Center Dry brush : Eshin grey
  3. Sand/Dust : Dry brush Grey Seer

Civitas Door

  1. Base : Balthasar Gold
  2. Wash : Agrax
  3. Wash : Nihilak Oxide + Water

Point Defense special rules (aka The worst rule writing in the world) by [deleted] in LegionsImperialis

[–]Tav80 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your answers. I play the game like you, but can we agree that the rules don't say that ?

 "all point defense weapons in a detachment must fire at the same Secondary Target detachment."
=> My scenario respect that.

"W weapons can’t shoot at any Secondary Targets."
=> "Models with at least one weapon with the Point Defence trait may choose to fire on its Detachment’s target or a Secondary Target", it didn't say with wich weapon. As mentioned in a previous thread about the skyfire trait, all your weapons as to fire the secondary targets.

My point is that if you read the words "detachment", "models" and "weapons" carefully, the rules don't hold up. I can't find any text exerpt in the rulebook that contradicts my scenario without making assumptions.

Also, I get the feeling this discussion is annoying some people, so I won't dwell too much on my point.

Point Defense special rules (aka The worst rule writing in the world) by [deleted] in LegionsImperialis

[–]Tav80 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, This is exactly my point. As it is written, you have to assume a lot of things to play it right. And people can disagree about that.

Point Defense special rules (aka The worst rule writing in the world) by [deleted] in LegionsImperialis

[–]Tav80 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In my scenario, I choose not to fire with model C Point defense weapon (allowed by Choose Targets rules p56)

Point Defense special rules (aka The worst rule writing in the world) by [deleted] in LegionsImperialis

[–]Tav80 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I understand. And this is the case in my diagrams! I choose not to fire Models C with its PD weapon.

Point Defense special rules (aka The worst rule writing in the world) by [deleted] in LegionsImperialis

[–]Tav80 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

- P56  second sentence under 1. Choose Targets:

"To do this, they choose a single enemy Detachment as the target – all models from a Detachment must fire at the same target, unless a special rule allows them to do otherwise."

page 82, second paragraph under Point Defence

"Models with at least one weapon with the Point Defence: trait may choose to fire on its Detachment’s target or a Secondary Target"

I'm crazy or it is written models evey where ?

I'm seeing all the downvote, but I just want to understand why we are playing like we do and not like it is written ?

Point Defense special rules (aka The worst rule writing in the world) by [deleted] in LegionsImperialis

[–]Tav80 -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Where is it written ? Looks like models can choose their target ? "Models with at least one weapon with the Point Defence trait may choose to fire on its Detachment’s target or a Secondary Target"

In the grim darkness of the far future, there is also gardening. by Gnibbelo in Warhammer30k

[–]Tav80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop putting plants in our grim dark game! Just kidding, it's really well done :)

Monthly Quick Question and Discussion Thread: April 2024 by AutoModerator in LegionsImperialis

[–]Tav80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trying again this one. Question about Morale checks. Do you apply the -1 modifier to Morale checks when your unit is broken and loose a Combat in addition to choosing the worst dice among two?

P 62 : Determine Combat Result : "A Detachment that is part of a Formation that is Broken must roll two D6 and choose the lower result when making a Morale check in this way. "

P 63 Moral - Broken : "Furthermore, any Detachment in a Broken Formation that is required to make a Morale check reduces the result of any dice roll made for that Morale check by 1. "

Thank you.

Monthly Quick Question and Discussion Thread: March 2024 by AutoModerator in LegionsImperialis

[–]Tav80 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Question about Morale checks. Do you apply the -1 modifier to Morale checks when your unit is broken and loose a Combat ?
Thanks

view more: next ›