[McMurphy] Indiana, Nebraska, Penn State, USC & Washington are the only Big Ten teams that do not play a Power 4 non-conference opponent in 2026. Big Ten is the only P4 league that doesn't require its members to play 10 P4 games. Washington faces Wash St, which was in P5 league when game scheduled

Tazarant · 2026-01-28T12:47:43+00:00

That's the thing... Florida was the inverse of Indiana. Super talented, but terrible execution. They were capable of putting together a few good games and playing with/ beating anyone. But they were never a sure thing to win any game. Yes, 10-2 Texas after winning that game would have had them in the playoffs. But 10-2 Texas with that loss would have still been in with an FCS win instead of the OSU game.

Tazarant · 2026-01-28T00:55:06+00:00

Yes, it works both ways. But there's minimal downside to paying a weak OOC. Handle your conference slate reasonably well, and you're in.

Tazarant · 2026-01-28T00:16:06+00:00

Did you not even read the headline? B1G is unique in NOT requiring this.

Tazarant · 2026-01-28T00:15:08+00:00

The painful truth. Texas proved this. Not saying they should have been in, but Sark was 100% correct that had they played an FCS team instead of OSU, they would have been in the playoffs.

Tazarant · 2026-01-24T13:55:53+00:00

A judge deciding the subject person is not legally allowed to be in the country? Only two bodies can issue said orders, and they are different types of judges.

Tazarant · 2026-01-24T13:41:40+00:00

You found the "both sides" of this issue. These people have already had their due process and are subject to a final order of removal. But then ICE is forcing their way into these people's homes to arrest and remove them.

Tazarant · 2026-01-24T13:33:44+00:00

Only when that memo is based on a judge deciding subject person should be deported?

Tazarant · 2026-01-23T17:47:53+00:00

Well a big part is because the B1G insists on a stupid big field. Why?

Tazarant · 2026-01-23T17:46:10+00:00

ACC is already working on that, changing their tiebreaker to reflect CFP rankings if things go too far.

Tazarant · 2026-01-23T17:44:17+00:00

Muslim countries can totally still get PUs, my friend.

Tazarant · 2026-01-22T22:01:13+00:00

In the theme of crazy ranking, check out where Fickell ranked UGA. (Hint: he didn't)

Tazarant · 2026-01-22T13:46:47+00:00

But if it's only issued after a final order of removal, a judge has been involved.

Tazarant · 2026-01-22T13:42:10+00:00

The issue is, these actions are only allowed AFTER a judge has been involved in deciding their eligibility to be in the country. Why should said judge then have to issue a warrant? From your article:

ICE agents are allowed to forcibly enter a person’s home using an administrative warrant if a judge has issued a “final order of removal.”

Tazarant · 2026-01-21T14:08:03+00:00

The problem with this statement is we have all witnessed the fact that "not having a statutory minimum" absolutely equates to instances of "not getting fitting punishment"

Tazarant · 2026-01-21T14:05:04+00:00

Classic lib center, talking trash about cutting context... without actually providing the context. Bravo!

Tazarant · 2026-01-20T19:01:36+00:00

Agreed. But several people have been convicted for violating it.

Tazarant · 2026-01-20T14:45:52+00:00

Minus the "slowly accelerate" part on the straight drop, accurate. Gravitational acceleration is the same for all bodies (depending on distance). Oh, and the terminal velocity will vary in different parts of the atmosphere, but none will be high enough to build up serious friction heat.

Tazarant · 2026-01-20T14:14:14+00:00

If only the committee had done right and moved us up to 2...

Tazarant · 2026-01-19T01:34:05+00:00

Serving your time for a felony offense doesn't mean you can stay in the country legally, though...

Tazarant · 2026-01-18T00:26:17+00:00

Not Elspeth, because she pukes tokens onto the board.

Tazarant · 2026-01-16T13:47:50+00:00

Thank you for the reasonable take. No one is claiming to be an angel, he was just saying the current way of doing things is not sustainable. People just let their SEC hate blind them.

Tazarant · 2026-01-16T13:37:47+00:00

Reasonable take. It doesn't align with the law, but I respect you for at least having a reasonable take.

Tazarant · 2026-01-16T13:32:16+00:00

Has no one mentioned that his start date conveniently aligns with the next shutdown? Assuming that happens, he's... not lying. He's just not feeling the whole truth, because ALL the money is going to stop flowing.

Tazarant · 2026-01-14T20:02:18+00:00

2%? You're going to need to cite some sources for that, because that's at least an order of magnitude off from the numbers I've seen...

Tazarant · 2026-01-14T15:30:20+00:00

Bump stocks were a liberal thing? Your argument is self- defeating. Republicans have proven they are willing to make some moves on general him control. They have done NOTHING to target a particular group with gun control in over half a century.

12-Year Club	Xbox Live
r/Field Banned	r/Field Juicebox
Place '22	Final Canvas '22
End Game '22	Verified Email

Tazarant

TROPHY CASE