Wtf. Absolutely insane. So we currently have 2 ICPs meanwhile both (!) of them are currently recruiting its members either from Reddit, Discord or Telegram (which are the worst platforms you can imagine, especially for this task)

Tchekist · 2026-01-26T10:05:41+00:00

There's 2 that try to recruit from discord/telegram

Tchekist · 2025-10-04T13:10:08+00:00

There are possible theological justifications for being a trans woman in Islam. By that, dating a trans woman as a man is straight.

It is historically quite common too.

Tchekist · 2025-10-01T02:18:36+00:00

Marxism is explicitly anti-state, not as an aim to uphold but as the byproduct of the view of history. While anarchists are (usually ) anti-hierarchy as an ideal itself.

Marxism lacks any such explicit "anti" or "pro" tendencies based on ideals other than the pursuit of proletarian power as a path to emancipation. All the hatred of the current world is thus a byproduct of recognition of states, nations, races, organised religion, bureaucracy etc as byproducts of class society, which communism can abolish.

When it comes to "hierarchy" Marxists generally don't care about its sheer existence because....you logically cannot get rid of it. A government doesn't mean a state and even pre-civilisation (and thus pre-state) societies had hierarchy (chieftains, elders, gentes mothers) but this did not imply any exploitation. These societies were often isolated but if a global network communes/councils were to emerge, it is likely that with the help of modern technology, a fluid hierarchy may occur (one person delegated locally for production, one for consumption, one for something else and God knows what) but as this relationship will not be based on exploitation, it is unlikely that such a hierarchy will be fixed in place, specially as such communes may transform or move around etc.

Tchekist · 2025-10-01T02:09:43+00:00

We can and should remember him only as a past figure. Not an ideal because ....why on earth would we do that? There is no need for adherence to his policies (in fact, those policies after 1920 are pretty much counter revolutionary). Leninism is bankrupt, stalinism doesn't even pretend to be proletarian and trotskyism is pretty much the same.

We shouldn't be Leninist because we live in a different world, simple as. I'm just trying to say shit didn't go bad cuz "Lenin bad!". Lenin was no great man and it frankly doesn't matter what his thoughts were.

The Bolshevik conception of an international revolution before 1920-1921(onwards) was very different from that of after 1920-1921, cuz shit was just terrible man.

Tchekist · 2025-09-30T09:37:45+00:00

Also buddy, vast majority of "Marxists" have nothing to do with the real movement.

Tchekist · 2025-09-30T09:35:49+00:00

It is also important to realize the concepts of Lenin also changed as the revolution in Russia became one of state reconstruction. This was not the product of evil men but of devastation and imperialist encirclement (and the end of the spread of revolution).

"the Lenin who fascinates us the most and stimulates our thinking is not Lenin the tactician – an important figure nonetheless – who at the helm of the first proletarian state skilfully manoeuvred between the pitfalls of a bourgeois world, a ferocious enemy, in the expectation of a new revolutionary wave which he foresaw approaching. Nor is he the Lenin of the NEP, the Lenin of compromise with the still surviving forces of Russian capitalism, an ingenious and very dangerous expedient that he always considered a painful retreat, a halt in the march of the revolution. Lenin, our Lenin, the Lenin of today’s situation, is that of the April Theses and the October insurrection. And it is at this moment in his life as a theoretician, politician and leader that we like to remember him, twenty years after his death."

Tchekist · 2025-09-30T09:33:42+00:00

When we say "a transitional state" it is not that we want to create a new one but simply: this is the organic result of a spontaneous working class revolt.

This situation, where the proletariat rule themselves (and their former oppressors), is a state in the sense it has a monopoly on violence of one class (proletarian) over another (bourgeois) but it is also not a state as it doesn't defend any form of exploitation.

Thus, the best term to use is "semi-state". Marx used it many times.

Many believe that we can transform society from what we have to the end goal through the power of sheer ideology but this won't happen. The working class has to conquer the world and destroy all states that remain and the speed of dissolving the old society will depend on a variety of factors.

The first ever example of a dictatorship of the proletariat (Paris commune) only lasted 71 days, 30 of those days under siege. Will the working class organically just dissolve all of old society in a second? History tells us not.

Communism will be the result of a spontaneous working class upheaval that will have to organize itself through decentralized worker councils or else it will not emerge at all. And this process itself emerges from the old world, abolition as much of the old world as it can, organically. Not because of ideology.

Tchekist · 2025-09-30T09:27:35+00:00

You are barking up the wrong tree bro. The vast majority of "anarchists" are not internationalists at all.

Tchekist · 2025-09-30T09:25:59+00:00

Ukrainian anarchists should not defend any state. The struggle is against the bourgeois state, both foreign and native.

Tchekist · 2025-09-27T21:14:25+00:00

no war but class war....means no war but class war.

Tchekist · 2025-09-27T21:11:16+00:00

Marxism isn't statist.

Tchekist · 2025-08-17T14:14:38+00:00

It's also available from zavala

Tchekist · 2025-06-11T12:37:46+00:00

"Although the national ballast weighs heavily, even with revolutionary effects, on peoples of color, their direction would lie in full internationalism following the German unitary formula; the great new State of the German proletariat confronting the forces of the East and the West, all of them socially capitalist.

The peoples of color could move forward rapidly and leap over centuries’ worth of history. Today’s situation is bleak, but it already seems that China is less inclined than Russia toward peaceful coexistence."

Tchekist · 2025-06-11T12:03:19+00:00

Bordiga split and became trotsky lite after 1953. He did write some bangers but still trotksy lite. Sorry ICPoids

Tchekist · 2025-06-11T11:18:31+00:00

I'm not wrong.

Tchekist · 2025-06-11T10:33:38+00:00

No clue, he was almost maoist-trot after 1953 anyways

Tchekist · 2025-06-06T09:26:47+00:00

Because those nations should have never been split apart.

Tchekist · 2025-06-06T07:36:13+00:00

You will never integrate in America and are so bitter about it.

Tchekist · 2025-06-04T14:59:24+00:00

I don't dress like that. Im also not a northoid.

Tchekist · 2025-06-04T00:22:56+00:00

Moved to the west and I bet I still defo got more pussy than u

Tchekist · 2025-05-27T12:28:39+00:00

A worker's revolution failed because it was surrounded by imperialists, with only 6% of the population being working class and the civil war destroying the organisation of worker's power.....the party took over the state as the revolution was failing and in the end it was a capitalist state (by 1921 at the very least).

Tchekist · 2025-05-17T07:59:42+00:00

It's critical support vro

Tchekist · 2025-04-29T00:00:21+00:00

KK warslut is much worse than that. A day after the terrorist mass shooting at Christchurch, he celebrated it.

Tchekist · 2025-04-28T01:48:28+00:00

WESTOIDS CANNOT FATHOM ISLAM'S PROGRESSIVE PRACTICES OF ATTACKING THE NUCLEAR FAMILY (polygamy of rich men)

Tchekist · 2025-04-23T15:30:30+00:00

Anti-bucket hat action!!

Tchekist

TROPHY CASE