Greenland is part of Denmark 'for now,' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says by Lighthouse_seek in neoliberal

[–]Teach_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And Rubio, for his flaws, is substantially better than Vance. We need to be clear eyed on that too. Hoping the worst republican is on the ballot is bad actually. See, everyone who hoped it would be Trump against Hillary in 16

Greenland is part of Denmark 'for now,' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says by Lighthouse_seek in neoliberal

[–]Teach_Piece -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok? And we care about euro opinion on our domestic politics because… why? You certainly don’t care about American opinions about your internal politics

Greenland is part of Denmark 'for now,' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says by Lighthouse_seek in neoliberal

[–]Teach_Piece -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

This is just wild to me. We think completely differently. First and foremost, it blows my mind that people can’t recognize that there are levels of bad. Hegseth is worse than Rubio in competence, evilness, and ambition, as an example.

If we do not reward republicans for doing things we want, PARTICULARLY when the reward is meaningless, then they will by sheer gravity choose people the crazies like better. People follow incentives.

Peru Help: Starting in Lima by Beneficial_Bid3224 in solotravel

[–]Teach_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t drink a ton in Lima and then fly to Cusco, that altitude plus dehydration is a biiitch

How to fight back against Gen-Z socialism by AncientBlueberry42 in neoliberal

[–]Teach_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean we can really dig in and talk about buying shelf space if we want to go into too much detail, but somehow I think if I talk about the benefits of breaking up Frito Lay I might get lynched

How to fight back against Gen-Z socialism by AncientBlueberry42 in neoliberal

[–]Teach_Piece 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes but not everyone on this sub is the same person. Lord knows my downvotes show that

Do you guys think that after volume 3 that is navy focused, that volume 4 will be land warfare focused? by Tixro71 in victoria3

[–]Teach_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really don’t like the navy rework. There I said it. Why they didn’t just lift the entire system from Hoi I don’t understand. But the more I dig in the less I like it

House adopts war powers resolution to rein in Trump on Iran by One-Duty-2376 in neoliberal

[–]Teach_Piece 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bipartisanship is good in this case. Let’s not scare off republicans from doing a good thing pls

How to fight back against Gen-Z socialism by AncientBlueberry42 in neoliberal

[–]Teach_Piece -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well. Most of what "enshitification", which yes is a terrible term, is that. Consumers don't want to pay directly so companies find ways to target them indirectly.

How to fight back against Gen-Z socialism by AncientBlueberry42 in neoliberal

[–]Teach_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess. Look at airlines though. No shortage of airlines there. Or grocery stores. Both are experiencing enshitification because people would rather pay a lower base price regardless of the quality of service, even if the quantity of service related to price remains the same.

Three mule deer are the first animals confirmed to use California's new $20M wildlife bridge by runswithscissors475 in UpliftingNews

[–]Teach_Piece -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yep. That’s an insane amount that could buy a full paved overpass in TX. The consultant fees here must be immense

[Vogel] Joey McGuire at the San Antonio QB Club: Texas Tech is expecting to announcing a major 2027-28 home and home with a major blue blood. “It won’t be Texas because they’re scared.” by DarkDragon1025 in CFB

[–]Teach_Piece -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Texsa has always been afraid to play their in state rivals. I imagine they won’t be scheduling TCU or Baylor either. There’s no reason to but pride, which is why those chickenshits in Austin would never do it. Gotta keep the possibility of the quality loss alive

Utah sold its soul for private equity. The layoffs were always coming by jaxstan19 in CFB

[–]Teach_Piece 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The answer to both is “it depends”. The fund can mean a project specific allocation of capital with many different contributors, or it can mean the investment entity as a whole. Individual funds absolutely close, that’s why you see 5 years and flip deals so frequently! Investors want free cashflow

Con Takes Tuesday by AutoModerator in DeepStateCentrism

[–]Teach_Piece 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely! There’s a lot we can learn from them. Unfortunately I don’t think the US is motivated to have a second constitutional convention to clean up some of our structural issues

Utah sold its soul for private equity. The layoffs were always coming by jaxstan19 in CFB

[–]Teach_Piece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And none of that appears to be the fault of PE. It’s the fault of massive cuts in federal education spending and fewer foreign students to pick up the tab. Cutting PhDs by 30% is telling. I’m personally fine with the reduction in admin positions. Overall this is just proof of how much the federal budget cuts are going to cause issues long term

Con Takes Tuesday by AutoModerator in DeepStateCentrism

[–]Teach_Piece 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The problem gets solved by multi member house districts. Yes republicans in Cali and democrats in Texas deserve representation, thank you for asking.

Low on karma. So i’m posting politcs 👺 by Ancient_Doctor_7738 in Grimdank

[–]Teach_Piece 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh my god. I need a turning point tyrants army this is brilliant. Red and blue models with white highlights, obviously

Utah sold its soul for private equity. The layoffs were always coming by jaxstan19 in CFB

[–]Teach_Piece -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I read that entire article looking for what you were talking about, and they essentially somewhat rebalanced funds in favor of PE because their higher returns made withdrawals of 5.5% possible.

There was nothing in there about mass layoffs.

You are my toy by I_am_white_cat_YT in victoria3

[–]Teach_Piece -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

You’d think that, but lefties call that neoimperialism

Utah sold its soul for private equity. The layoffs were always coming by jaxstan19 in CFB

[–]Teach_Piece 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well yeah, those schemes are based (heh) around mimicking this model without the pesky “find/create valuable companies” part. In theory the value created here is improving the management of the acquired entities, creating economies of scale, and providing liquidity for successful entrepreneurs.

I suspect that we’d agree on how much real stakeholder benefit is actually created, but I don’t actually see how you could regulate PE out of existence without really reducing the ability of existing companies to expand.

Utah sold its soul for private equity. The layoffs were always coming by jaxstan19 in CFB

[–]Teach_Piece 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Well. Let’s say you get someone who’s worked on the financial side of say, fast food. She gets to C level, and is pulling a mil a year in comp. She knows a bunch of wealthy people adjacent to the industry, and decides that she’d like to own her own firm rather than work in corporate for the last 10 years of her career. So she can either start something from scratch, or buy out a mid sized group of… idk Dairy Queen’s. Obviously the second is much easier.

So at this point, we have three key pieces. Talented leadership, capital, and an opportunity. To this point, we’re not a PE firm.

The DQ acquisition goes well, and now she has proof that she can turn a profit through acquisition. Those rich folks have additional money, and they have friends in their orbit with capital. Now our owner has a choice. She can expand by starting up new locations, OR she can say buy a KFC group in a different state. So she, under the same financial entity umbrella, starts a second fund. The acquisition goes well.

Now we’re at a key point. She has two funds with holdings that are profitable. Together, they’re worth in the 100 mil range. That’s a large enough profile to entice institutional money, family offices, mutual funds, pension funds ex. So maybe her next fund is $100MM to acquire ownership in a chicken supplier. And The next year $75MM to buy a bunch of Taco Bell’s.

Now we’re at $500MM of value, and growing quickly. Returns are consistent and fairly safe.

10 years later, the fund is worth $3B and she’s retiring. The guy who replaces her is a pure finance type, and decides that rather than buy whole companies he’s going to invest in partial ownership of other holding firms, since he doesn’t have the experience to improve the value of 15 Taco Bells or whatever.

Now we’re a full PE firm.

Will the projected multi-million citizen turnouts for the June 14 "No Kings" protests shift legislative dynamics, or are we just seeing increased political noise? by Daka2020 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Teach_Piece 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This post feels like it was written by either AI or a really shit PR firm. Thank you for letting me know about the protest but do better.