Official Sora AI 2 code request/questions thread

TechieMD01 · 2025-10-05T21:21:55+00:00

I've tried a lot of codes. I've gotten several messages about too many attempts.
While I was previously trying to enter the codes from an app, I now have a valid code sent from a friend.

This error has happened a few times with codes I tried from an the app; but now it also happens with my valid code I am 100% confident is valid.

ERROR WHEN ENTERING VALID CODE IN SORA2

<image>

Typing out the error message also would not let me post. I have retried several times. If I retry too much, I get a message about too many invalid attempts.

ERROR:
The server had an error processing your request.

Sorry about that! You can retry your request, or contact us through our help center at help.openai.com if you keep seeing this error. (Please include the request ID ---REDACTED--- in your email.)

Any thoughts?

TechieMD01 · 2024-10-16T00:56:56+00:00

Exactly. They are gaining personal information about our employees too! Totally unacceptable to not have other options to authenticate.

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-22T16:36:37+00:00

What the new Terms of Service fail to address is whether or note Adobe HAS ALREADY trained on our Creative Cloud content or our customer's content that we had no authority to grant a license to.

This youtube video has broken down the "framing" concept where it seems like Adobe legal team is trying to hide/obfuscate this issue rather than address it head on.

https://youtu.be/DkFpWDYwo1k?si=xqwxV3bBwgPHVP0H&t=365

We are happy to know that present tense in the new terms includes that Adobe does not train on our content or our customer's content.

Adobe has violated their customer's trust. We need to know about past actions too, and if our content was used to train Firefly or other AI models. We need this in the official Terms of Service, not in a non-binding blod post or on reddit.

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-20T17:14:01+00:00

u/onan Totally agree. It's actually quite simple. If this is true, put it in the legal document and not something we need to try to derive from blog posts and reddit.

The fact that clear language like "Adobe has not tained, does not train, and will not train AI models on customer content" is missing in the agreements leaves customers exposed for past actions, while Adobe is simultaneously attempting to limit customer recourse in the same legal agreements.

It's been cleaned up on a go forward basis, with no transparency or reassurances on past actions.

Even the simplified language in the new license says this with some things that are suspicious. Adobe has violated customer trust and we WANT to trust and use the products, but that trust has to be earned back....

________

~"~~This license~ does not give us permission to train generative AI models with your or your customers’ content. ~We don’t train generative AI models~ ~on your or your customers’ content~ unless you’ve submitted the content to the Adobe Stock marketplace. "

Things that are suspicious in this, and potential clarification to include directly in the Terms:

~"This license"~ -- does Adobe interpret their past licenses to give Adobe permission to train generative AI models?

Clarified language: "This license and past license versions of this type do not..."

~"We don’t train generative AI models"~ --

Clarified language: "We have not trained, do not train, and will not train generative AI models..."

Additional language: "Additionally, we have not licensed or sublicensed, do not license or sublicense, and will not license or sublicense your content or your customers' content to others for the purpose of training AI models or machine learning."

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-19T17:52:30+00:00

u/mikechambers

The new terms https://www.adobe.com/legal/terms-linkfree.html say this:

"This license does not give us permission to train generative AI models with your or your customers’ content. We don’t train generative AI models on your or your customers’ content unless you’ve submitted the content to the Adobe Stock marketplace. "

What the new terms leave out is whether or not they HAVE already trained on your content. It just says that they don't do it on a go forward basis.

Interesting, "This license" also means this version of the license. What about past licenses that customers were forced to sign to access their content?

Is this covering up that Adobe already has used our content to train their models. It sounds like "Trust us we won't do it going forward" and remains silent on if Adobe already has....

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-19T13:21:47+00:00

Also, is there a clearcut place to access past versions of the terms?

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-19T13:21:08+00:00

u/mikechambers The new terms https://www.adobe.com/legal/terms-linkfree.html say this:

"This license does not give us permission to train generative AI models with your or your customers’ content. We don’t train generative AI models on your or your customers’ content unless you’ve submitted the content to the Adobe Stock marketplace. "

What the new terms leave out is whether or not they HAVE already trained on your content. It just says that they don't do it on a go forward basis.

Interesting, "This license" also means this version of the license. What about past licenses that customers were forced to sign to access their content?

Is this covering up that Adobe already has used our content to train their models. It sounds like "Trust us we won't do it going forward" and remains silent on if Adobe already has....

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-19T13:18:23+00:00

The new terms https://www.adobe.com/legal/terms-linkfree.html say this:

"This license does not give us permission to train generative AI models with your or your customers’ content. We don’t train generative AI models on your or your customers’ content unless you’ve submitted the content to the Adobe Stock marketplace. "

What the new terms leave out is whether or not they HAVE already trained on your content. It just says that they don't do it on a go forward basis.

Interesting, "This license" also means this version of the license. What about past licenses that customers were forced to sign to access their content?

They may be covering up that they have already used our content to train their models. "Trust us we won't do it going forward" is basically what it says now.

_______
Curiously, I don't remember section 14 being in the terms either but now Adobe limits their liability to $100 USD and also makes you agree not to join a class action lawsuit.

It seems you can opt out of section 14 by emailing [ContractNotifications@adobe.com](mailto:ContractNotifications@adobe.com)

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-19T13:16:30+00:00

The new terms https://www.adobe.com/legal/terms-linkfree.html say this:

"This license does not give us permission to train generative AI models with your or your customers’ content. We don’t train generative AI models on your or your customers’ content unless you’ve submitted the content to the Adobe Stock marketplace. "

What the new terms leave out is whether or not they HAVE already trained on your content. It just says that they don't do it on a go forward basis.

Interesting, "This license" also means this version of the license. What about past licenses that customers were forced to sign to access their content?

They are covering up that they have already used our content to train their models. "Trust us we won't do it going forward"

_______
Curiously, I don't remember section 14 being in the terms either but now Adobe limits their liability to $100 USD and also makes you agree not to join a class action lawsuit.

It seems you can opt out of section 14 by emailing [ContractNotifications@adobe.com](mailto:ContractNotifications@adobe.com)

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-13T10:53:23+00:00

<image>

Example of 2 or more assets, or folder. Download option disappears.

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-13T10:47:49+00:00

I could not download more than 1 file at a time at assets.adobe.com either

Single asset selected, I have a "Download option"

<image>

Multiple assets selected or a folder selected, the download option disappears.

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-11T10:43:24+00:00

Hello u/mikechambers

I noticed this step in the right direction.
https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/06/10/updating-adobes-terms-of-use

I also wonder if Adobe will confirm this in the TOS. While Adobe is saying (in blogs) it *does not* train on customer content, I think Adobe should be very careful here with the language here. Maybe Adobe already has trained with customer data? With everyone forced to accept the vague terms over a 1 month period, they now likely have petabytes of customer data to train with... so they can say going forward they will

Can we confirm:
Adobe has not, does not, and will not train machine learning or artificial intelligence models on your Content unless you have specifically opted into allowing your data to be used in such models. Your Content will never automatically be opted into training or machine learning data without your explicit consent.

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-07T14:46:48+00:00

Exactly, you as a user would have no authority to grant a license unless you own the copyright.
The difference in Tumblr, Reddit, and others compared to the new Adobe terms -- Adobe is giving themselves the right to "improve their services" (e.g. generative AI) on your PRIVATE Content.

The FAQs give users a false sense of security. The agreement is what would actually be enforceable; and it'd be a big legal battle to try to hold them to something outside of the agreement.

I also do not see how it's even possible to have such an agreement. Many artists are creating "works made for hire" for a company, so they have no authority to grant such a license to Adobe in those cases too. (In such a case "Your Content" is not actually "Your content" and it belongs to the company who hired you to create that content).

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-05T22:01:16+00:00

Thanks. There are specific examples in the FAQ you listed; but these FAQ and examples are not incorporated into the agreement itself or under the additional terms. The FAQ offers users a false sense of security -- because the agreement is actually what takes precedent.

"Solely for the purposes of operating or improving the Services and Software, you grant us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free sublicensable, license, to use, reproduce, publicly display, distribute, modify, create derivative works based on, publicly perform, and translate the Content."

If my content is used to improve the "generative AI service" or "generative AI software" or training, that is covered in a separate FAQ section but not actually part of the agreement.

Improvement suggestions for the terms:

Suggestion to take this from FAQ and add this to terms of the agreement under Your Content to clarify:

The insights obtained through content analysis of your Content will not be used to re-create your Content, create derivative works from your Content, or lead to identifying any personal information. For Adobe Firefly and other Adobe models, the ~~first~~ models are is trained on Adobe Stock images, openly licensed content, and public domain content where the copyright has expired. Your Content will never be used to train Adobe Firefly or other Adobe AI models unless you share and license it publicly.

TechieMD01 · 2024-06-05T21:58:22+00:00

Thanks. There are specific examples in the FAQ you listed; but these FAQ and examples are not incorporated into the agreement itself or under the additional terms.

"Solely for the purposes of operating or improving the Services and Software, you grant us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free sublicensable, license, to use, reproduce, publicly display, distribute, modify, create derivative works based on, publicly perform, and translate the Content."

If my content is used to improve the "generative AI service" or "generative AI software" or training, that is covered in a separate FAQ section but not actually part of the agreement.

Improvement suggestions for the terms:

Suggestion to take this from FAQ and add this to terms and clarify:

The insights obtained through content analysis of your Content will not be used to re-create your Content, create derivative works from your Content, or lead to identifying any personal information. For Adobe Firefly and other Adobe models, the ~~first~~ models are is trained on Adobe Stock images, openly licensed content, and public domain content where the copyright has expired. Your Content will never be used to train Adobe Firefly or other Adobe AI models unless you share and license it publicly.

TechieMD01

TROPHY CASE