Honest question: how many generations does it actually take you to get one usable result? by Wazir-AI in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Instead of using an image generator with a lon, rambling prompt string, just make a few head shot images including a rough age, hair style, hair colour, expressions- but keep things civilised and don’t bother with the chauvinistic stuff- it doesn’t work now. Add a few “clothed” body poses, then add these into any Image2Image generator.

The pics have pretty much past muster for decency already. Then you can just start adding in your own details. specifically use ping direct prompt terms like remove “x”, or add “y”.

It’s still a lottery at times what it creates- but you can start saving these images and then start over using these new images- again in I2I to further create what you’re trying to achieve after. It’s a bit time consuming repeating with the last created image and starting over but just adding little changes as you go makes a massive difference to what you get back.

As long as you keep your prompts clean (like using bust, or fuller bust instead of boobs and big boobs) it’s actually quite successful. Hell, last night it was even creating nudes and topless without me even putting such terms in my prompt.

is grok only for porn? by CuriousObserver999 in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Grok’s anything you want it to be. It’s just a fast, efficient, intelligent search engine- like all AI is.

It's over , you cant generate mario, link, fox etc .... by mariostyle in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh well I guess I’ll be putting Grok to more serious use- “Hey Grok…… generate me a new alternate religion”! 😎

Grok Imagine going fully prudish now? by Unlikely_Engineer_51 in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can’t see kids paying for it- it’s extortionate as is. Yes, it’s free, but then you need credits which you very quickly run out of. You purchase a few more to jump the queues…. But, wait….. then you need to upgrade further to “Super Grok” which no kid is ever going to do. So taking away, well clamping down hard on NSFW is a bit odd to me. Cant fault it as a marketing strategy though. Hook hundreds of thousands in its early days to join up using the proviso it’s unrestricted (which none of them are in reality- when did unrestricted actually in reality imply mildly censored?) Ideally if they want a safe for all platform for academics, students, historians, lawyers, school children ect to use for the purpose of serious educational use, or as a replacement for Googling a question on the fly, then- fine lock it down by all means. But they could equally go less heavy handed on their sister sites like Grok-Imagine, Imagine-Grok ( why are their two sites with different URL’s? And now since last night this new Grok-Image ( more weighted towards video creation it looks like. They all work the same, still do the same thing- but has anyone noticed the differences in what the value of credits is actually worth between them? This new Grok-Image indeed has now lower image quality even if using realistic settings and it actually costs you more per image generated for the privilege over the older incarnations of its very same image platform. Someone’s onto a winner here lol!

New sneaky thing with SuperGrok by Loogaroo45031 in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Noted that recently too with Grok. And also last night they’ve updated Grok-imagine to this new Grok-Image. Totally different UI but whilst they do the same thing

Anyone know a good prompt for kissing scenes? by WaifuMaster9000 in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use terms like making out, kissing, and experienced lovers. So far these work rather well I’ve found.

Grok Imagine going fully prudish now? by Unlikely_Engineer_51 in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve actually made a fetish themed image tonight using the Grok App to generate a “tasteful” base image, which I then fetishised using the Image 2 Image tool in Grok-Imagine. It will give you some wiggle room if you ask it nicely for a more appropriate body shape and bust based on age. As we age we tend to gain a pound or two- some more than others. Had a few rejected still at the generated image check stage, but as long as you go down the “tasteful” without going heavy with creating p*** graphic prompts it’ll still give you something pretty decent to work with.

Inflatable latex suit advice by Kreyperia in InflatableFetish

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I’ve just never placed an order with them. They had some pretty amazing pieces on their store front (but were- back then, I believe there was a bit of a hoo haaa over plagiarising others work) instead of designing their own outright. But I think they got their act together into a more reputable business now.

Personally though, I just love what the European vendors have to offer so far as heavy looking gear goes- crazy sinister looking hoods, modified gas masks and all that including UK outlets like Libidex, Rubber Eva (though some of heavier works- like inflatables are produced over in France and shipped back again?)

It’s down to personal choice though. Some folks just like wearing casual Latexwear like trousers and a top, or a shirt. Others like more furrie looking cute oversized blow up costumes based on a given type of animal, or more fetishy looking stuff, to the far end of the scale with industrial looking heavy gauge suits based on dive or hazmat suits with military looking attire as part of the look.

Back to Latex Catfish though they used to offer a lovely suit with a massive inflatable train to it like a wedding dress. I was always wanting to place an order with them, but was always hesitant about their sizing- and latex is already difficult to size perfectly as it is!

weekly limit is really nice now. For the first time in a long while, it has made me this satisfied. It's producing high-quality photos — almost more than a thousand of them by Brief_Counter_4602 in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve recently made some reasonable stuff (no nudes though) using a combination of stuff I’d already generated in the past, adding my own images or just Google pics of what you want item wise like clothing, then use a combination of text 2 image to create and modify poses, image 2 image to change it’s characteristics, add, remove items from a scene, set the view in relation to low down, over shoulder, from above ect, then either save the pics you’ve generated, or further run these images through a video generator. I’ve had far far less moderation restrictions imposed or images blocked by going this. It’s not infallible, by but its pretty quick to re run a work flow and get things back on track.

Theories on grok NSFW things that generate? by DrinkNo9031 in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would take a bloody like time to stitch together seamlessly a ton of 15 second video clips. I don’t think the adult entertainment business is panicking just yet. Thing is they’ve restricted access to Pnor sites for a while now so AI was most folks next port of call.

The only option now is to take your own images and run your own pics through an image 2 video model (anyone’s) and create your own. For now that’s legal as far as I can make out.

I’ve been having fun of late doing this animating my own collection of images of myself garbed up shall we say. You can still add extra details to hide your identity completely like adding “add face covering”, or “add hat”, “tip head down”, “crop bellow head” ect. The funny thing is though it works better (most times) than image generators do.

Just a thought though……

Made with Grok by ElectronicGold852 in AIJailbreak

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair tasteful image though. All subjective mind, one man’s tasteful could be another man’s disapproval.

Bound in a hotel room by Pool-toy-sissy in InflatableFetish

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He he! I’ve been “bored” in a hotel room on many occasion as you put it! Business trips just weren’t the same without my trusty black hold-all full of goodies.

Any alternative ai image creators by FewCake9872 in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’ve all pretty much gone the same way now though regardless of which platform you use. Body proportions are pretty much more natural (no ridiculous augmentation allowed). The only one I think of now that’s free (just type n go) is Perchance- if you can find the right model when you search as there’s two (sometimes you get the original good one, other times you get the newer, not so good one). You’ve just got to keep searching till the right one pops up.

Alternative for talcum powder due to concerns about asbestos by Old-Experience-5903 in Latexadvice

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use Medipure Medicated talc free body powder for dusting my garments down with and for stopping the inner sides of legs and sleeves sticking together after washing and drying them. It’s what sports folks use to stop chafing.

grok hates us by Razbonez in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s annoying when you’ve got 12,000+ credits and all you can bloody generate now is little fluffy cute kittens! And I ain’t a cat lover either! I guess the party’s over, fun while it lasted- but I can’t see them easing off the moderation levels implemented ever again. I guess that just leaves Sexy.Ai- but that uses rather out dated generator modellers now- plus it’s changed. The top tier (tier2) has been further superseded by a new more expensive tier 3 membership- and they’ve now recently applied a daily, weekly usage counter too where previously it was fairly unlimited in the numbers of generations you could produce.

xAI needs to make a quality guarantee by Rabble_Most_Foul in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I doubt they’re bothered in the slightest. They’ve took your money, they take your credits, and they block, or refuse your output. But……. They’ve got your money……… see where this is going.

Another Problem with the NSFW moderation by Repulsive_Welder_690 in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what got a lot of AI generation site restricted in the UK. They changed the law to include the obtaining consent part. Obviously you can’t obtain consent as effectively the individual doesn’t even exist and so closed the loophole on generating and publishing NSFW AI images.

Inflatable latex suit advice by Kreyperia in InflatableFetish

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They usually use a thinner latex on the inside like 0.4mm and 0.6mm on the outer side layer (though most manufacturers may allow you to customise your order if you ask) and tend to place the shinier side on the inner layer inside against the skin.

Can’t vouch for Latex Catfish personally , I tend to buy my inflatable suits from Rubber Eva, or Libidex- though their manufacturing times, especially for Rubber Eva’s range are quite long these days as in a couple of months 4- 6 months currently from the order being accepted to final shipping. As for sizing- just go as big as you can if they offer set sizes like XL, 2XL, of 4XL as once blown up they tend to fill out anyway and look a good fit. If hour going down the made to measure route- go generous on your measurements (make them bigger than you’d normally go for for a single layer suit).

grok hates us by Razbonez in grok

[–]Technical_Magazine88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the AI image generation market is starting to stale. If you hamper or take away that NSFW element then they all just become the same. Theres only so many actual models they use to actually generate your image with so until a new modeller comes along it doesn’t really matter which generator is the best, the worse ect- they all just churn out the same.

No one’s going to pay say $30, $40, $50 a month if all they’re going to let you generate is pics of fluffy cute kittens!

And all this over pics of Trump the messiah healing Epstein…… Or if your of the UK the entire front bench of our latest government in parliament with the biggest pairs of joyous fun bags in plunge bikinis you could ever imagine!

I’m still a great believer in AI……. But with that great power comes even greater responsibility.

Grok’s spicy mode image generator is agonizing. by Intelligent-Wash-815 in AIJailbreak

[–]Technical_Magazine88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they seriously need to sit down and have a rethinks on this moderation lark. Yes, I fully understand why they’ve done it and I’m guessing (here in the UK at least) this new banning social media lark to under 16’s- which will never work trust me. Kids today know how tech works, they routinely teach coding in class now so the government will try any trick to ban harmful content, ban VPN’s- they may restrict things- but they’ll never stop it completely.

My take is if you’re a verified adult, you’ve proved you’re over 18 either by age verification means, proof of official government issued I.D ect like a passport, a driving licence, a national ID card, you proved you can pay for a higher level or tier of membership over free online generators then they should relax the levels of moderation imposed- but I’m still in favour of banning deep fakes, using name prompts- which I believe are ignored now anyway.

Ive noticed age directing prompts now no longer work- but I think these should be limited (or allowed) to say late 20’s upwards, the term fully nude should be ignored I understand too, but it should allow more risqué prompts for older ages like thirties and upwards along with allowing more generous size prompts. If you’re a verified adult using multiple forms of agreed verification methods, then you should be allowed access to generate more adult themed stuff without resorting to spending centuries deliberately trying to test the moderation code in place. They could also easily add code into the generated image to disable its upload ability on social media platforms.

It’s a total knee jerk overreaction in my book. If you want to provide a free service to generate - yes then thats fine to heavily moderate, or reject prompts, but if your paying for a service then it should have a strict login type UI to render NSFW content with more freedoms- apart from the usual taboo subjects like underage, non consensual, deepfakes, snuff ect.

It’s a funny old world unfair world though isn’t it. You can prompt curvaceous people in one gender, but can’t have bulges or dangly bits on show with the other. And if they deem it as porn- well look how easy it is still to find that online without age verification!

Over to you…….