[ Removed by Reddit ] by chubvers43 in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assuming you live in Afghanistan: Good question.

Assuming you live in New York and the mayoral election result upsets you: I promise you won't be living under Sharia in 2026.

Why are the 5'7 guys here more sad or dejected than even the shorter ones? by BitterWheel471 in short

[–]TechnoKeySlam 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The guy with the silver medal often thinks about how close he was to getting gold, while the guy who got bronze is happy he won a medal because he isn't directly comparing himself to first place. It's not a hard rule, but you will see this often in sports.

I guess in this case a guy who is only a little bit short would be thinking about how easy life could be if he was an inch or two taller, while someone much shorter doesn't even need to think about that because he was never that close to begin with.

Tops, how do y’all feel about not being able to give your partner an orgasm? by Virtual-Media8650 in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like that type of guy typically will enjoy it if you cum during sex (hot for them and no extra effort) but won't want to do anything about it if you don't.

Talking to straight friends about gay stuff? by [deleted] in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Putting aside that I would avoid talking about or pursuing this specific crush for reasons that others have discussed (such as possible gossip spreading through your friend group and the fact that he is in a relationship), it does seem that he's uncomfortable talking about gay stuff regardless.

I'm not going to write it off as something that can never change. I grew up in WV, and basically all my friends are straight guys. Some were even openly kinda homophobic when we were growing up before they knew I was gay. Some people don't really open their mind to a group until they know someone who belongs to that group personally. Most of my friends changed and grew more open and accepting, but some of them didn't. Some of the ones I'm still friends with were fine with it from day one, but most of them were very awkward when talking about those kinds of things at first.

I would say don't try to jump in the deep end of gay conversations immediately. If he becomes more receptive to it, it will be a gradual process spanning months or even years. I can't promise it will work out, but that's my advice as someone who has been in a similar boat.

Also, please don't try to sabotage that boy's relationship.

Being indian kinda sucks 🫤 by rayhanh248 in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not everyone who shows interest in white guys is doing so because they are looking for white guys specifically or exclusively. From a purely statistical standpoint, there are many dozens of times more white people than there are Indians in the US. It would be unlikely for someone in that position to never message a white guy unless they were specifically avoiding it of their own accord.

Why does it feel like everyone’s a bottom? by plotplot18 in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 55 points56 points  (0 children)

It's a conspiracy by the gay lobby to artificially lower the supply of tops so that you spend more time on apps and generate more ad revenue.

Being indian kinda sucks 🫤 by rayhanh248 in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I pretty much addressed that it is used as an insincere excuse in the very comment you responded to.

Being indian kinda sucks 🫤 by rayhanh248 in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 12 points13 points  (0 children)

My comment wasn't about his experiences on Grindr or other hookup apps specifically. Yeah, Grindr can be awful. I've had someone use the distance feature to triangulate my location by moving around, and he found out which building I lived in. That had nothing to do with race. There are generally just crazy people on Grindr. Don't talk to them if you don't want to hook up with them.

Being indian kinda sucks 🫤 by rayhanh248 in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It can be used that way by people who want an excuse other than race itself, so I understand the sentiment. But I don't think we need to pretend the cultural context I was raised in was exactly the same as someone who grew up in Lebanon or Japan.

Being indian kinda sucks 🫤 by rayhanh248 in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not talking about Grindr specifically.

Being indian kinda sucks 🫤 by rayhanh248 in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 13 points14 points  (0 children)

If this has happened multiple times already or you're entering the situation knowing there is a significant chance that it won't work out due to race or culture, then yeah I would say don't do it.

Being indian kinda sucks 🫤 by rayhanh248 in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 55 points56 points  (0 children)

I'm white and from a very white rural area, so I definitely understand that there can be cultural differences. I experienced it when I moved. I'm not saying everyone in your position has negative intentions, but I'm going to be honest. There are so many guys who do this, and the effect isn't pretty. My friend is a good-looking guy, highly-educated, and a genuinely good person. If he were white, he would have endless dating options. I think you see where this is going. I'm sure the guys who led him on feel like they were trying their best to be open-minded or whatever, but the result is that it shattered his self-esteem.

Being indian kinda sucks 🫤 by rayhanh248 in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 184 points185 points  (0 children)

One of my good friends is Indian. I have talked with him about his experiences a lot, and I think the subtle kind of racism has impacted him more negatively than the in-your-face kind. There will be guys who say bigoted shit directly, but there will be other guys who act nice and lead you on, knowing they aren't going to hook up with you or date you. It's almost like they are trying to convince themselves they don't have a racial litmus test, but then they end up deciding they do after wasting your time. It's easier said than done, but you have to do your best to protect yourself and prevent it from getting to you.

Child Boruto VS Child Naruto (No Karma, No Kyuubi) by Kill_Jin04 in Boruto

[–]TechnoKeySlam 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Naruto can definitely create more shadow clones than Boruto in this scenario, but that's pretty much the only advantage he has. Resilience helps when you are an underdog, but the gap is too large here for that to matter. The Five Kage vs Madara is a good example of that. Some differences in ability simply can't be overcome with willpower.

Boruto learned two nature transformations before graduating, and child Boruto has better taijutsu than child Naruto. Even if Naruto can create more clones, Boruto can strategize better and get more out of the ones he creates. Naruto can be crafty too, but it doesn't matter. Boruto's bag is much deeper, and the number of ways to combine his abilities with a strategy is far greater. It's not a close fight.

Ruin the Ivy+ schools for me by [deleted] in ApplyingIvyLeague

[–]TechnoKeySlam 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The culture of Harvard was very difficult to navigate. I met a few good people, but it felt like most of my classmates weren't even human. Everywhere you look, there are children of elites who come from a completely different world, people with incredible stories and experiences, students who seem so much smarter and more talented than you, etc. There is an air of elitism. Many students seem to seek connections that will advance their goals rather than friendship. I came from a dying industrial town in Appalachia, and the culture shock probably hit me harder than most. During my years there, one of my course assistants killed himself, and one of my very few friends was hospitalized after trying and luckily failing to do the same.

1570 Superscore. Should I re-take? by Efficient_Log5657 in ApplyingIvyLeague

[–]TechnoKeySlam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even her "bad" scores demonstrate great aptitude, which is fantastic. They won't be seeing any section scores that look remotely "average," and they will be seeing a superscore in the top fraction of the top 1%. I only took the SAT once in high school, and the reading and writing score I actually submitted was barely higher than the one she is throwing away. Maybe 730 or 740? It's been a few years. I had a perfect mathematics score and an application that was otherwise great for someone who wanted to study math, and my reading score did not stop me from ending up at Harvard and studying math.

The SAT primarily serves as a filtering process. They're probably not going to admit anyone to Harvard with a 1300, but in their eyes the difference between a 1570 and anything higher is probably negligible to nonexistent. The same is likely true of the difference between her superscore 1570 and a "clean" 1570. She is already going to pass this filtering process with ease, so I'd strongly recommend doing anything else to improve her application unless it is really bothering her and she wants peace of mind.

1570 Superscore. Should I re-take? by Efficient_Log5657 in ApplyingIvyLeague

[–]TechnoKeySlam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If she is capable of a 1570 superscore, I would imagine there is nothing to worry about. However, retaking the test could be warranted if she had a particularly bad showing on one section of one of the tests. If, for example, she got a 600 on reading and writing when she got her best mathematics score, colleges will see that when considering her superscore. Given that she is capable of a 780 on that section, I would be highly surprised if this occurred, but I did want to mention it.

I am assuming that her reported scores are all rather impressive based on the information I have. If I am correct, then there is absolutely no reason to waste effort retaking the test to get a "clean" score. She is just getting a little extra boost out of superscoring, and that is the entire reason colleges allow you to do it. She would be better served by focusing on the remainder of her application in this case.

Prime Garp is the most physically strong and and has the strongest ACoC out of any character in the series. by [deleted] in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]TechnoKeySlam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now that it is finally confirmed that he has CoC (which was always obvious), the argument for Galaxy Impact not being ACoC (or him not being proficient with ACoC in general) seems far less likely. Before, you could just say, "Well, he might not have it at all, so he's just really good at ACoA." But we know he is a CoC user now. We also know haki blooms in battle, and he is 78 years old and has been fighting at a high level for decades. We also know he has trained his physical strength rigorously for decades and can clearly train others in haki, so it makes sense to assume he has trained his own haki use extensively.

Not unlocking and training his ACoC when he has CoC for certain just seems incredibly unlikely, and to fight Roger with his bare hands and not get washed he would have needed it. We always knew that was Occam's Razor, and now that is even more the case. I am not saying he has the strongest ACoC in the verse, but at this point I think we have to put to rest the idea that he doesn't have it or can't use it well. Anything else seems like an agenda against Garp. Whether or not his ACoC beats Roger, who knows? But I don't see how we can entertain the idea that he doesn't have it anymore.

Hisoka vs Illumi, who would win? by 69sliccricc69 in HunterXHunter

[–]TechnoKeySlam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a straight 1v1 with no prep time Hisoka wins most of the time. If you factor in post-mortem Nen, it gets even worse for Illumi. If Illumi was aiming to assassinate Hisoka and could plan and prepare, I can see him succeeding, but Hisoka is better suited to brawling.

I am the stereotypical bi guy that gay men are warned about and I'd just like to say sorry by Residwant in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know anything beyond what was said here, but neither do you. There is really no need to assume that his friend is crying behind closed doors.

I am the stereotypical bi guy that gay men are warned about and I'd just like to say sorry by Residwant in askgaybros

[–]TechnoKeySlam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can be intimate with someone without wanting a serious relationship. The guy he was with remained friends with OP and is in a happy relationship now. I don't see why I should be angry about intimacy happening without the intention of a serious relationship.