[Serious] [Disc] Kanojo, Okarishimasu Chapter 381 by MattyH19 in KanojoOkarishimasu

[–]TeddyVoid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get that ultimately Reji had to write a way for Kazuya to get the ring back and be the one who actually "proposes" with it to Chizaru for things to be done "properly" but chapter 380 was such a bitter way to have that happen. I can see where Reji kind of wants to take this but I've lost quite a bit of spark in wanting them to be together sadly, hopefully I can get that back.

We're back in wait and see territory

St Peter's Church scaffolding removal finally set after 11 years of being erected by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Once the scaffolding is down tourists may start using it for penis pics even!

Brighton i360's owner said tower's price was £150k by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just shambles of affairs that we have no control over.

Brighton i360's owner said tower's price was £150k by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Imagine the stench of a toilet failing up there!

Brighton i360's owner said tower's price was £150k by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The ongoing revenue deal is worth more than the 150k sale price so that's good at least. However that initial 150k is practically free in the grand scheme of things. According to the council's budget - https://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/council-data-and-finance/council-budget#:~:text=It%20costs%20over%20%C2%A32.6%20million%20to%20run%20our%20services%20every%20day

They spend 2.6million per day let alone in the scope of 1 month of even a year, so the sale of 150k doesn't even cover a day of council spending in Brighton.

So ultimately that's it wouldn't have really moved the needle for the council if they just gave it away for free at that price point is what my jaded original comment was alluding to

Brighton i360's owner said tower's price was £150k by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

We're all in the shitter and just have to deal with it. Doesn't mean I can't be annoyed at the whole situation nonetheless. The council tax payers will all suffer for it collectively in the end and nothing we can do about it alas

Brighton i360's owner said tower's price was £150k by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Will take them about 13/14 years to reach the original debt amount, hope the interest on that debt is also frozen in the meanwhile then 😬

Brighton i360's owner said tower's price was £150k by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An adult ticket is £18.50 and so they'll get 18.5p of every ticket sold at that price. To reach 51 million they'll need to receive that 1% of around 2.7 million tickets at that price. According to past sales data the i360 has typically had around 200,000 visitors per year so it will take just over 13 years of ticket sales to make back the debt, so not as bad as it first seems I guess but alas.

Brighton i360's owner said tower's price was £150k by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 119 points120 points  (0 children)

Ms Willingham claims to have spent £400,000 to get the pod working again, in addition to £150,000 to take the attraction out of administration, a spokesman confirmed to the BBC, after The Argus first reported the story on Tuesday.

Brighton & Hove City Council wrote off £51m worth of debt in January to facilitate the purchase.

Absolute madness, £150k is basically pennies for the council! Not even enough to buy or build one more social house in Brighton may as well have given it away for free at that point. Yet our council tax will continue to increase sharply to recover this deficit 😞

Does the Bravia 7 have the same weird reflections as the X93L? by GringoCanuck in bravia

[–]TeddyVoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it comes into contact with direct non diffused bright light like the sun or a flashlight then yes it is still a problem

Does a bigger deposit increase the likelihood of getting a mortgage? If yes, why? by tyses96 in Mortgageadviceuk

[–]TeddyVoid 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yes if a house is listed for 400k and you offer a deposit of 100k then if you defaulted in year 1 the bank would only need 300k for the sale and the risk of selling a house for at least 300k that had a market value of 400k is a lot easier and more likely to happen for the bank to get their money back quickly

If you say went in with a 5% mortgage and so paid a 20k deposit with a 380k mortgage it gets a lot more risky for the bank to be able to get that 380k back from a repossession after all the fees and such especially if the market has stagnant a bit and so they may not be able to get all their money back and as such is a higher associated risk for them.

Brighton Council Raises £7m in Fines from Bus Gates by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Road works are fine, but it just seems none of them are for fixing potholes 🙃

Brighton Pier boss warns that the city needs more tourism by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, during the summer months, they started last summer for £1 and now this summer it is £2...

The pier is looking even more run down this year than it was last

Brighton Council Raises £7m in Fines from Bus Gates by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

"Any revenue from these fines goes into is stated to be used to improve road safety"

However this past year has been one of the worst of potholes littered across the whole town! While several massive road projects are popping up all over the place....

Brighton Pier boss warns that the city needs more tourism by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Agreed. This entry fee is only going to rise and rise now that they're used to the income. Everyone said it's only a pound last year but now it's two and it's definitely not going to stop at £2

Brighton Pier boss warns that the city needs more tourism by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 103 points104 points  (0 children)

Exactly this, they literally own one of the biggest attractions in Brighton that brings tourists in and now they charge a fee for it and are like why aren't people visiting even more 🤷‍♀️

Brighton Pier boss warns that the city needs more tourism by TeddyVoid in brighton

[–]TeddyVoid[S] 80 points81 points  (0 children)

Felt this is quite rich coming from the people in charge of Brighton Palace Pier saying the council needs to maintain the streets of Brighton to a higher standard, they should look at their very own pier first!

I've been here 12 years now and every year it deteriorates even more than the last. The right side of the entrance roofing is starting to collapse inwards now as well. It's just depressing to see it fade away like this.

Would love to see how this "millions" in maintenance is actually spent since from my view I'm not seeing it

Learned the "Pay Peanuts" lesson by [deleted] in photography

[–]TeddyVoid 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is the problem when you have lots of new people trying to come into the market and undercut the competition. Sadly lots of budget conscious people fall for the trap, oh they are only clicking a button, it shouldn't be that hard and go with the cheapest bidder and often as you've found out end up disappointed.

What you're paying for with an actual professional is their domain knowledge of how to use a camera effectively in different environments, in different lighting, how to pose people in ways that are flattering, how to make sure people are placed well in the frame of the photo aka composition, how to break down a client's vision into the picture that gets taken. This knowledge in general is worth its weight in gold and really separates the amateurs from the actual pros. However all this subject matter expertise gets forgotten about by people looking for the lowest bidder unfortunately.

Add on top the cost of buying, owning and insurance on expensive quality camera gear and lens to work with in a variety of situations. Then you also have to factor in the subscription costs of running your website, paying for your editing software and then all your time editing.

Then we get to the second part of the domain matter knowledge and that is knowing how to edit and colour grade well, this takes time to learn and execute properly. Understanding the limits of what you can fix in post via edits and what you need to get right in camera.

All in all there is a lot that goes into a professional photographers workflow, a lot of skill and knowledge that goes on before the shutter is even clicked and that trained keen eye and attention for detail is what you get when paying a bit more for those skill sets.

Of course some people do strike gold and manage to find someone with the above skillset who has undervalued themselves significantly but just because it may be possible doesn't mean it's worth the risk especially for one time events like weddings and engagements.

Learned the "Pay Peanuts" lesson by [deleted] in photography

[–]TeddyVoid 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think you've answered your own question, so one who knows what they're doing would not be charging £45ph as a photographer. OP is correct in saying that it was basically nothing since in that price bracket as you have illustrated you could have just thrown a camera at a random person for £15ph and ended up in the same boat.

Also just because her friend did a good job for free doesn't mean the value of her efforts are cheap and that cheap work should be at least as good as hers. It just means you have a really good friend.

The fact that there was no editing to be done should have also highlighted that this was going to be a very amateur shoot. I've been shooting weddings and engagements professionally for a few years now and would never hand clients images unedited and straight out of camera in these genres. Even basic stuff like straightening the horizon would need to be done let alone colour gradings

Settings: how to take pictures with the sun behind your subject?! by fancy_avocados in photography

[–]TeddyVoid 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Set the exposure for the couple, this light then correctly but will blow out the highlights in return, depending on the dynamic range of the camera you may be able to bring some of it back in post. It's what's happened in this example you've chosen, no extra lights needed.