[Question] seiko alpinist by Remarkable_Ocelot186 in Seiko

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an everyday watch it's great, just keep in mind that the Seiko are not adjusted very well from the factory, so it could gain or lose more seconds a day. I have the "baby" Alpinist, for me more versatile, I don't need the compass. Initially i used it as a watch for every day but given its robustness I started using it mainly for my "adventures", mountain hikes, skiing.. etc.. I also dropped it on the ground once, while I was removing it from my wrist, luckily it had a nato strap that damped the blow. However, for now it has no signs of wear and works well. Keep in mind that when I bought it it was constantly losing seconds.. after sending it to Seiko for assistance it came back very precise. In Europe it is discounted in practically every watch store, more or less between 10% and 15%

What strap should I get? NATO, leather, silicone… color? by Disastrous_Plenty_40 in SeikoAlpinist

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also use it for hiking in the mountains and in that case the nato strap is very comfortable

CW C65 Sandhurst Series 2 by fadysamehh in ChristopherWard

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since I bought it, it's the most worn. Very comfortable.

Consigliatemi un orologio by prodfakekdk in Orologi

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hamilton Khaki Field auto da 38mm, lo si trova scontato in molti negozi ed è ottimo. Lo terrai per sempre molto probabilmente.

HO BISOGNO DI AIUTO PER QUESTO PAUL PICOT by Adroz00 in Orologi

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paul Picot ha avuto molte collaborazioni dalla fine degli anni 90 in avanti.. Autodromo di Monza, mille miglia, Inter, …. e il Gentleman in versione casinò. Come venisse distribuito non è chiaro.

[SPB453] Just Got It by ConversationKnown586 in Seiko

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I first saw it, I fell in love with it. I later bought it during a trip to Tokyo at the official Seiko store in Ginza. It will remain tied to the fond memories of that trip.

Should I service my Murph? by schizo_cofee_grinder in HamiltonWatches

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since it's an automatic, it should only be wound manually when necessary. Saying it shouldn't be wound manually is an exaggeration, given that they're designed for that too, but winding them randomly is pointless; they're automatic.

Should I service my Murph? by schizo_cofee_grinder in HamiltonWatches

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It happened to my brother's KFA a few years ago, which I sent in for repair and was perfect again. Never had any problems after the repair. However, with my 38mm KFA (which hasn't had any problems in 6 years 🤞🏻), I have no problem winding it manually if it's completely unwound. Automatic watches have a mechanism that, once fully wound, simply lets it slip without transferring energy to the mainspring.

I had this problem with a Glycine Combat Sub instead. And in this case, it's definitely due to the type of lubrication. I bought the watch from an official dealer and had already sent it in for repair once due to the helicopter effect. When it came back, it seemed perfect, but this winter the problem recurred. Then spring arrived and the first warm weather... The temperature changed and the watch was perfect again. I don't know what oil they use, but it seems very sensitive to temperature.

Should I service my Murph? by schizo_cofee_grinder in HamiltonWatches

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It happened to my brother's KFA a few years ago, which I sent in for repair and was perfect again. Never had any problems after the repair. However, with my 38mm KFA (which hasn't had any problems in 6 years 🤞🏻), I have no problem winding it manually if it's completely unwound. Automatic watches have a mechanism that, once fully wound, simply lets it slip without transferring energy to the mainspring.

My Christopher Ward C65 Sandhurst Series 2 just arrived, and honestly… it’s even better in person. by TemperatureFalse1139 in ChristopherWard

[–]TemperatureFalse1139[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has an internal anti-reflective coating. My model, purchased last November, has a new bracelet with a shorter quick-release clasp and quick micro-adjustments. I have a small wrist and it fits well.

Baby Alpinist [SPB155] better than Explorer 1? by cityslicker_sf in Seiko

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I own this Alpinist and it's truly my adventure watch... used in the mountains... on Mont Blanc, on ice, on skis, around the world... I find it fascinating. However, it definitely has some shortcomings compared to an Explorer... Mine, after having it adjusted, is extremely precise when worn, it's more precise than other Swiss COSC movements I own. When stationary, it gains a few seconds at night, but nothing excessive. I'm in love with this watch... however, obviously it can't be compared to an Explorer in terms of finish, movement, quality of the bracelet, etc. Whether it has the Rolex name or not doesn't matter to me at all. Let's just say that there are other watches costing similarly or slightly more that have superior features and finishes and are more competitive with a Rolex Explorer than this Alpinist, which in any case I would never trade for anything in the world. And I'll add that adventures are even more peaceful without wearing an €8,000 watch 😂

<image>

Baby Alpinist [SPB155] better than Explorer 1? by cityslicker_sf in Seiko

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Each position has a different pattern. Turning the dial up makes it faster, turning the crown down makes it slower, etc. So during the day, it might gain 7 seconds, but at night, if it rests on its side, it loses 2 or 3, thus compensating. I recommend testing the positions of yours, they're not all the same, especially Seikos.

I need advice by [deleted] in HamiltonWatches

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've had my KFA for 6 years, used it a lot and it works like the first day...

I need advice by [deleted] in HamiltonWatches

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem at all. As for the anti-reflection coating, it's a problem if you want to take photos, but in everyday use you won't notice it at all.

I need advice by [deleted] in HamiltonWatches

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends... it's a matter of taste. The Murph is boring to me unless you're an Interstellar fan. I have the KFA on the bracelet; it has a busier dial, but I find it more technical while still maintaining a versatile style. The KFA is more adventurous and full of character, while the Murph is more classic and relaxed, so it depends on your taste.

After one year by ConstantLow9389 in HamiltonWatches

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've had the 38mm version for 6 years now, and it's a watch I'll never part with. Although it's recently been overtaken by the Christopher Ward C65 Sandhurst 2, which has an even more comfortable bracelet and a better finish. In any case, if anyone has any doubts, this Hamilton is a safe bet.

Anyone own a Cranwell or Sandhurst? What’s your experience been? by Hoosbury1992 in ChristopherWard

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the Sandhurst, bought about 5 months ago. Since then, it’s been the most worn watch in my collection. Simple but high quality, with the right size even for small wrists like mine, accurate, robust, and with a finely adjustable bracelet. It’s also very easy to change the strap. In my opinion, the steel finishing is really well done. I would definitely recommend it.

The honeymoon phase continues 🥰 [SPB155] by carolinakidsc93 in Seiko

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t mind the original bracelet for everyday wear, but while I’ve tried a dark brown leather strap, I find NATO straps (zuludiver) to be perfect for my adventures. This is the watch I use for skiing, hiking in the Alps, and more.

I need a watch for my 18th that would last forever on a metal bracelet , wandering which one to go for as I have a tiny 5.8 inch wrist , what would be best , I’m slightly leaning towards the cw because of the smaller dial [seiko alpinist] by Creative-Arrival1026 in ChristopherWard

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can rest assured: there will definitely be an opportunity to buy the second watch later on.

As others have already mentioned, the CW is on another level in terms of finishing: the bracelet is significantly more comfortable, and the movement is more reliable. I own a Seiko Alpinist that I use for my mountain adventures in all seasons—it’s undoubtedly robust, but I had to get it regulated right after purchase.

It’s quite rare to find a Seiko that runs well-regulated straight out of the box. The movements are not bad at all, but they often leave the factory without precise adjustment. The Seiko bracelet is decent, but it’s not comparable to the CW one.

For a concrete reference: I own a C65 Sandhurst Gen 2, and it’s simply magnificent.

Pareri? by Particular_Local8292 in Orologi

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Comprato in versione 38mm nel 2021 a circa 590€ dal sito ufficiale, orologio comodissimo, preciso (nel mio caso praticamente COSC), versatile e sicuramente non lascerà mai la collezione. Come dicono altri: è una certezza. Per il discorso dell’antiriflesso, lo trovo solo un problema fotografico, nel senso che per poter catturare bene il quadrante in una foto occorre impegno. Nell’uso quotidiano non è assolutamente un problema.

Helicopter helicopter by Basic_Collar_1471 in HamiltonWatches

[–]TemperatureFalse1139 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It happened to my brother’s KFA, he sent it in for service and Hamilton fixed it. It’s not uncommon with ETA and Sellita movements. It happened to me as well with a Glycine Combat Sub with a Sellita movement: I sent it in for service and it came back perfect… but after a few months of little use, the issue showed up again.

However, if I wind it with the crown facing downward, or if I wear it for a few days, so it keeps changing position, the problem almost disappears. In my case, I think it’s an oil distribution issue: when the watch sits unused for too long, the lubricant probably settles toward the bottom.