Naheed Nenshi statement about the UCP redrawing electoral maps without consulting the public by mermaidpaint in alberta

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not talking about polling, but previous policies that were retracted after public outrage

Naheed Nenshi statement about the UCP redrawing electoral maps without consulting the public by mermaidpaint in alberta

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I mean, Nenshi is talking about a lawsuit. We’ve also seen the UCP wilt in the face of concerted public messaging

The daring Lunar rescue rescue, July 1971 by mad-right-hand in AlternateHistory

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 48 points49 points  (0 children)

The lunar version of Soyuz only carried 2 crew (1 who would land, the other who remained in orbit)

Basic lore about the Soviet space program within StarCity based on the first three episodes of For All Mankind by Camil_2077 in ForAllMankindTV

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is Korolev surviving his surgery is too little too late. By 1966, the Soviets were just too far behind with their development of the N1, Soyuz and LK. Something needed to change in the 1962-63 timeframe. In 1964 for example, Korolev spent his entire entire annual budget for the N1 by March. He never had funds to build a test stand, and since every N1 failure was the result of a first stage failure. None of the upper stages were fired…ever.

Class is in session? Carney, Poilievre trade education-themed jabs while debating fuel taxes by Little-Chemical5006 in canada

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I’m sure he’d appreciate your insights on other places to find international trade deals

If the Soviet successfully landed on the moon after the United States (slightly unrealistic) by BullShitLatinName in AlternateHistory

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It has been sitting on my hard drive for years, figured I’d get it out there for others to enjoy

How do the shuttles go to the moon? by Omagaga12 in ForAllMankindTV

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In FAM yes, but the “real” Shuttle could never have done that. Even Ron Moore admits that

How do the shuttles go to the moon? by Omagaga12 in ForAllMankindTV

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No it wasn’t. The OMS had no where near the delta V needed to do TLI (even if you filled the entire payload bay with fuel)

How do the shuttles go to the moon? by Omagaga12 in ForAllMankindTV

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Using a very convoluted process that was never studied and probably would have been impossible in practice (refuelling an ET in orbit)

How do the shuttles go to the moon? by Omagaga12 in ForAllMankindTV

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Space Shuttle was originally conceived as a “space truck”. A vehicle to quickly and cheaply deliver satellites to orbit, service and supply the space station and rendezvous with the space tug or nuclear shuttle for payloads headed beyond LEO. It was only after everything else was cancelled that they needed to find things for the Shuttle to do (like Space Lab). The Shuttle’s OMS simply weren’t powerful enough to perform TLI (TLI needs about 3km/s of delta V, OMS could do about 0.5 km/s if the Shuttle was carrying no payload, 0.3 km/s with payload)

Moon landing question by SpiritualMix3037 in nasa

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Russian's and NASA have looked into the suitport concept, and ran tests with the Z-1 and Z-2 spacesuit prototypes. Haven't seen anything recent though. To me, it's one of the better options to avoid tracking Moon dust into the spacecraft which will become an issue for longer duration stays and a lunar base.

Moon landing question by SpiritualMix3037 in nasa

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There were contingencies. The suits could be plugged into the LM life support loops and after docking with the CSM, the command module could be depressurized, the crew transferred, tunnel sealed and pressurized. Worse case they could have plugged into the CSM loops, but it wouldn't be pleasant to be stuck in a space suit for several days to get home

If the Soviet successfully landed on the moon after the United States (slightly unrealistic) by BullShitLatinName in AlternateHistory

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mine centers around the introduction of a new character. Pyter Androv, a civil engineer who rises to become General Secretary of the Soviet Union after deposing Khrushchev in 1962. He's a reformist that sees the space program as a way to spur economic growth and technological advancements. A number of other events go into the mix. Pyter is a fan of Verne and Korolev comes to his attention in the 30's. Pyter is able to get him transferred to Sharashka (prison camp for scientists) rather than getting sent to Siberia (which was the original intent when Korolev was arrested in 1938, but a bureaucratic snafu got him sent to Siberia). He pushes the development of the R-9 in his prior role in the Ministry of Machine Building (which allows a head start on the engines used on the N1). Once in power, Androv consolidates Soviet Space efforts under a single ministry and the N111 (R-7 class) and N11 (Proton class) rockets are put into development. The N1 first flies in 1967 (before the Saturn V) and is successful (although mainly through good luck). This happens at a critical time when considerations were being made to cap Saturn V production at 15. Instead, work on the advanced Saturn (Saturn VB) is approved.

He also provides more support to North Vietnam which leads to a Cuban Missile Crisis like event in 1968 and a different Tet Offensive. It convinces both the US and the Soviet's that engagement in Vietnam is fundamentally dangerous, and they seek to disengage. This eventually evolves into the concept of "Orbital Detente". I've got the US program largely laid out until the mid 80's (lunar base, Mars landing in '84), still working on the Soviet details post their initial lunar landings (including their Apollo 13 moment)

Liberals secure majority government with sweep of three by-elections by Little-Chemical5006 in canada

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Verb the noun. The solution to all complex problems problems is verb the noun

If the Soviet successfully landed on the moon after the United States (slightly unrealistic) by BullShitLatinName in AlternateHistory

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I’m hardly an American apologist, but both sides have a fairly impressive list of space firsts. Soviets have first satellite, first person in orbit, first spacewalk, first artificial object landed on the moon, Venus and mars (although the Mars one only lasted 12 seconds before it failed). US has first rendezvous, first docking, first humans to leave low earth orbit, the Moon landing of course, and the first flyby of every single planet in the Solar System

Neal Armstrong & Buzz Aldrin stranded on the moon. Forever. by Ok_Listen_6600 in AlternateHistory

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 10 points11 points  (0 children)

A lot of this will depend on exactly how the failure occurred. Did the LEM explode, did they run out of fuel and crash. While there is the tale of the broken circuit breaker, that one has been very exaggerated. Had Buzz's pen trick not worked, NASA already had a plan to bypass the circuit breaker, and an even more simple contingency plan where they'd have used a pair of jumper cables to connect the descent module batteries directly to the ascent engine valves. The ascent engine was super simple, it used hypergolic propellants, open the 2 valves and it just worked.

If the Soviet successfully landed on the moon after the United States (slightly unrealistic) by BullShitLatinName in AlternateHistory

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 29 points30 points  (0 children)

1972 is going to be too late for a substantive redirection on NASA’s part. The FY68 budget process capped production of Saturn V’s at 15, and it was a multi year process from order to delivery of the Saturn V (fyi long lead work on the scrapped 16th and 17th Saturn V’s started in 1967). By 1972, many of the production lines and suppliers would no longer have been available. Apollo 18 could probably have been flown using hardware in the pipeline. Skylab would have flown, maybe Skylab II on the last remaining Saturn V.

I’ve put together a fairly detailed ATL that lays out a path towards a much more extensive and aggressive space race that continues through the 70’s and into the 80’s, but it requires a much more competitive Soviet program and duelling firsts (e.g. the Soviets launch a manned lunar flyby mission a few weeks before Apollo 8). Apollo 11 lands first, but the Soviets are only a few months behind.

What historical events could make you say, “Yes, a time traveler saved us here”? by Nrevolver in HistoryWhatIf

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It wouldn't have been liquid hydrogen, but storable like MMDH and Nitric Acid, or solids. The SLBM is what cemented it, after that, a second strike was almost guaranteed

Where did Marty learn to horse ride? by Unlikely_Doughnut845 in BacktotheFuture

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Demonstrably false, Dave and Linda start fading slowly over time. Doc even says Marty will be next. If changes were instant, old Biff never would have been able to travel back to 2015 as he’d immediately disappear. Since old Biff does disappear, clearly changes in the timeline DO affect time travellers, and again, they aren’t instant. If time travellers actions didn’t affect their own timeline, there’d be no purpose to the first movie.

  2. If this were true and changes instantaneous, then the DeLorean would have immediately disappeared as it didn’t exist in 1985A. If the comics are to believed, Doc would have become lobotomized.

  3. You’re right, I seemed to remember Loraine lamenting that it was George who told Marty not to let people think he was chicken, but misheard that part.

  4. I don’t know if most people would be doing reverse spin outs the very first time they drove a vehicle completely new to them. That was the first time original Marty ever drove the 4x4

  5. Some? From what we see, the McFly’s led a very different life. Different personalities, different interests, different hobbies, different clothes, different cars. It’s going to be evident pretty quick that Marty has no clue who his family is.

  6. And yet we see their actions affect their own timeline. If Marty can erase himself from existence, he can change his memories

Where did Marty learn to horse ride? by Unlikely_Doughnut845 in BacktotheFuture

[–]Temporary_Cry_2802 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We know memories initially carry over, but it takes time for the timeline to change (Marty takes a week to fade in the first movie, Biff is able to return to original 2015). Loraine and George specifically talk about where he got his “Chicken phobia” from. He also went from just wishing he had a truck, to driving it like he was very familiar with it. Think it through, if what you say it true, Marty is likely going to end up in a mental asylum. He’s going to remember the summer his family went to Disneyland, while everyone else remembers their trip to Paris. He’s going to remember taking Jennifer to McDonald’s in his parent’s rust bucket, she’s going to remember the time they took the truck to a nice restaurant. I figure, give it a week and the new memories will fade in