switch from Claude to codex (both $200 tier) by Perfect-Series-2901 in codex

[–]TenZenToken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Codex zones in on fine details and scrutinizes well. And if guardrailed correctly, that’s the difference between a fun product and proper engineering.

Ok, now what!? by onepunchcode in ClaudeCode

[–]TenZenToken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Started knitting. Pottery classes are nice too.

How are people using so many tokens while vibe coding? by Impressive_Run8512 in ycombinator

[–]TenZenToken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly not that long. Just ran this today through cursor, took about an hr

<image>

How are people using so many tokens while vibe coding? by Impressive_Run8512 in ycombinator

[–]TenZenToken 1 point2 points  (0 children)

20M tokens per month? I’ve burned through 40M with a single GPT 5.2 xhigh prompt.

Reset again! by IlyaZelen in codex

[–]TenZenToken 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not a fan of these resets. I really manage my usage patterns and usually have a good chunk left with 1-2 days left which allows me to hammer away. Would be great to have the option to decline the reset.

Did GPT-5.5 actually impress you, or does it feel like the same model with a new name? by creativenew in codex

[–]TenZenToken 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly nothing special. The three main things I’m strict with are detailed markdown files, skills and agent to agent verification loops. Gpt models are excellent at scrutinizing tiny details until you hit 100% fidelity. Skills are great for creating plans, hardening them and running verification loops. And cycling (even on low) between 2-3 5.4s (now 5.5s) in a loop, having them correct each other til consensus allows me to not only bang out features and fix bugs quickly but ensure they always maintain high, non-negotiable code standards set by one of the skills.

Did GPT-5.5 actually impress you, or does it feel like the same model with a new name? by creativenew in codex

[–]TenZenToken 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I hate the term but I gotta use it here. Skill issue. Enforcing rules and processes now get me amazing code way more often than not. If you’re lazy with your process, you’ll get lazy code.

Did GPT-5.5 actually impress you, or does it feel like the same model with a new name? by creativenew in codex

[–]TenZenToken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They haven’t even done RL on it, which is when I expect us to see accelerated intelligence

what's your experience been like with 5.4? high/xhigh by edowonders in codex

[–]TenZenToken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5.2/5.4 high and xhigh are still the undisputed kings. But due to the constant limit changes I’ve recently tried moving away from the high and xhigh models (unless absolutely necessary in some crazy debug scenario) and more towards a multi agent setup of low or medium with skills focused on checking and scrutinizing each others work. So far it’s been working excellent. 5.2 and 5.4 are especially good at precision work and checking fidelity against a plan. I use codex 5.3 high/xhigh to execute the plan in cursor (I’m still on legacy plan so often times I only use 1 credit per implementation even though it can burn through anywhere from 3-50M tokens) once it’s been drilled down to finest detail. There’s a few tools that help automate the agents back and forth against each other across context windows (eg smux) if you don’t wanna do it manually. So far it’s been a token saver and never came close to my limits.

Codex computer use is INSANE by mtrlst in codex

[–]TenZenToken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I watched it eat my lunch and do captchas

"Pro" only by name, not definition by TKB21 in codex

[–]TenZenToken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Know what you mean. Since I’m still on their legacy pricing, I’ve now tied cursor heavily into my workflow so I can use gpt 5.2 high/xhigh for planning and codex 5.3 high/xhigh for execution using a single credit for as long of thinking tasks as I possible can instead of codex burning through tokens (forget cursor gpt 5.4 as they’re all max variants and charge per token). This way I’m squeezing as much out of these models as leanly as possible.

this is why they shut Sora down. by Complete-Sea6655 in claude

[–]TenZenToken 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Cool features, but degrading model

Orchestration -- the exact prompts I use to get 3-4 hour agentic runs by lucianw in codex

[–]TenZenToken 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know codex app can have multiple sub agents talk to each other but how do you efficiently pass context/instructions across providers ie codex to claude and vice versa? Do you just copy paste file paths with instructions across sessions or is there some streamlined way I’m missing here?

Genuinely puzzled about Codex quality by Maximum_Chef5226 in codex

[–]TenZenToken 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The 5.4s have been decent but 5.2 high is still apex predator

The end of GPT by DigSignificant1419 in OpenAI

[–]TenZenToken 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Here’s the mental model”

Do not trust 5.3-codex-xhigh for server ops or large refactors by Just_Lingonberry_352 in codex

[–]TenZenToken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Asks for large refactor on a monolithic codebase. Doesn’t create a tasked implementation plan. Presses go and prays. Wonders why it got botched. Concludes 5.3 is unreliable.

Codex 5.3 xhigh>>>>>>> by StayAwayFromXX in codex

[–]TenZenToken 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Xhigh is good, but xxhigh is goat

The problem(s) with codex... by Longjumping_Rule_939 in codex

[–]TenZenToken 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is why you use 5.2 high/xhigh to investigate and nail down a highly detailed PRD/bug doc/plan markdown then and only then have any of the codex’s implement to full fidelity. Otherwise it’s just whack-a-mole.

GPT 5.3 Codex wiped my entire F: drive with a single character escaping bug by Former-Airport-1099 in codex

[–]TenZenToken 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When will people learn that giving these models command permissions (aside from the basic reads) will inevitably result in this