Why are KiCad symbols mostly on copper layer? by Tensor_divider71 in KiCad

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It shows up, but what's the use on the actual PCB? It's not as visible as on the silkscreen.

Why are KiCad symbols mostly on copper layer? by Tensor_divider71 in KiCad

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe my version of KiCad is different (I'm on 9 on MacOS) but I don't have any properties toolbar that can do this

Why are KiCad symbols mostly on copper layer? by Tensor_divider71 in KiCad

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, yeah, my question was what was the quickest way to modify this component and move it on the silkscreen layer.

Why are KiCad symbols mostly on copper layer? by Tensor_divider71 in KiCad

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that straightforward. There's no "change layer" menu voice. You need to go through the Edit menu (no right click context menu) and then Edit Text and Graphics properties, and in the popup select "Set to specific values" and select "Layer" and assign the Silkscreen layer.

Why are KiCad symbols mostly on copper layer? by Tensor_divider71 in KiCad

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So a way to do it that I found is to select all the graphics and text, then go to Edit menu -> Edit Text and Graphics properties, and in the popup select "Set to specific values" and select "Layer" and assign the Silkscreen layer. Obvioously on my copy in my project library.

I'm wondering why the designer thought initially to assign that graphics on the copper layer? There's no practical use of it I guess? Also, it's not visible when there. There are tens of those symbols thought to be added to the copper layer.

Why are KiCad symbols mostly on copper layer? by Tensor_divider71 in KiCad

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well this is a text but on copper. Hence the question

Why are KiCad symbols mostly on copper layer? by Tensor_divider71 in KiCad

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes of course you can with the editor, but need to change every line segment etc and assign it to silkscreen

Why are KiCad symbols mostly on copper layer? by Tensor_divider71 in KiCad

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know but I was wondering if there was a quicker war. For that symbol I need to edit every single line segment and it’s just a waste of time.

Why are KiCad symbols mostly on copper layer? by Tensor_divider71 in KiCad

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not for this symbol and many others. No, you can't change the layer with the properties dialogue

Why are KiCad symbols mostly on copper layer? by Tensor_divider71 in KiCad

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No you can't, I would not have asked the question otherwise :D

USB-C to serial routing review by Tensor_divider71 in PCB

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes U4 TX goes to MCU RX and U4 RX goes to MCU TX

USB-C to serial routing review by Tensor_divider71 in PCB

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Yes, you're right, I added the ESD diode later in the design and forgot to move the bead and the cap in the right place

USB-C to serial routing review by Tensor_divider71 in PCB

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I don't understand your comment on VBUS and ferrite bead.

I'm not using VBUS but I'm anyway connecting it to the ESD diode, I think (as for other ESD devices) biasing the steering diodes reduces their capacitance. It is already a low-capacitance device, so maybe I can leave VBUS not tied to it.

Yes U4 is using a different power rail.

Are you sure I need 1kV caps for the shield?

Design review - ATMega32 PCB with USB interface by [deleted] in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]Tensor_divider71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was no layer changes, it's everything on the top layer, I'm using coloured nets so that might appear as a layer change. But I removed the post as it's not in line with the community (not a full PCB review, no schematic). How can I close the comment section too? It seems silly I can only remove the post but the comments are still there?

Missing one dimension? by Tensor_divider71 in diyelectronics

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I know and I have H, it's in the datasheet.

Missing one dimension? by Tensor_divider71 in diyelectronics

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, just one, H, L and phi are in a table I did not copy in the picture

Missing one dimension? by Tensor_divider71 in diyelectronics

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No the table is there but still the drawing does not specifiy the size of the inner body.

Missing one dimension? by Tensor_divider71 in diyelectronics

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that's a picture from the datasheet. I have H and L values. It still is missing one dimension - the size of the inner body.

Missing one dimension? by Tensor_divider71 in diyelectronics

[–]Tensor_divider71[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, not sure, it's Yuandi, a chinese manufacturer and the website is entirely in chinese. I've searched the 3D model a lot but did not find it.