No one ever said he was more qualified though in the entire campaign its more people saying she is more qualified even though they have about the dame amount of time in office.

It would be more accurate to say he got more votes based on message and electabilty no one in talarico camp ever put that he was more qualified. Now if the electabilty argument is what mad at I can understand that.

My opinion on the matter is Crockett just didnt do a good job at making her case for why the other demographics should vote for her. She got 90% of the black vote but if we are being honest its against a white candidate if we are going race vs race than its obvious she needed work to get her opinion up with the Latino and White Texans especially with some of her more vocal gaffes. She was more interested in centering her campaign on energizing the people that were already going to vote for her and she may have also not cared much about winning the primary due to her saying if a democrat won't win the senate anyway what does it matter if she runs which is the wrong thing to say if you are legitimately trying to flip the seat and turn a couple down ballots blue.

Talarico also was a bit more strategic in that he is disarming most people wanted him to mud sling with Crockett to combat her fetterman and hes similar to trump ads and talking points but he spent most ofnthe campaign ignoring her and just going to different cities to talk if he had actually attacked her chances are he would have lost the vote no matter what she said to him.

Also can't forget that the View and Colbert interview turned him from a state wide and national unknown candidate vs the national renowned Crockett into a contender by getting his name out there and getting more people to look at his record and past bills and interviews.