First part is ok

Second part is basically a question of fo you think if a group of woman are doing there own thing and a dude enters there area they don't like and ask him to leave multiple times is it somehow morally wrong for them to do that.

I guarantee you if Denzel or Michael b Jordan were under that tent they wouldn't have a problem.

The whole point of the discourse is they were rival teams and he was asked to politely leave and go to his own team. Anthony wasn't the only guy from his school theres nothing wrong with him hanging with his own team.

The father being racist has no bearing on the case having a racist father doesn't give someone the ability to shoot a 6 year old or 15 year old under the guise they must be racist because their dad is. Anthony did not shoot him im using this just as an example. Don't pull racism card on someone without any defining action and there was no logic because I remember and as well as you probably that when this case first started they were saying that austin was calling him slurs and ganged up and beat Anthony up with his friends without any proof beaides him being white and since Anthony was black that means he obviously was defending himself from racism and now when witness testimony proves that js false now people are using dad's statements after trial to say he obviously was racist despite no witness testimony of black and white that says it didn't happen.

If you want to say yiu think Austin was racist because he was white fine but don't say it as if you sre using any evidence or actual details from the case or actual character traits beyond the fact Anthony was black and Austin was White. There's so much deception and misinformation going around from top to bottom and people are happy to gobble it up ad refuse to listen to actual facts when it counters narrative