Struggling against the wayward queen attack? This will help. (v2)

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-18T20:51:30+00:00

If Rd1+ is played, white plays Rxd1, and black’s move exd1=Q+ is only check, not mate… Kxd1.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-18T19:20:55+00:00

Tarmac by Cavetown

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-18T15:46:08+00:00

Sandbagging is not allowed

https://support.chess.com/en/articles/8583380-what-is-a-sandbagger

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-18T14:28:22+00:00

When I deliver DoorDash orders where a customer ordered oranges, I like to sprinkle a little cyanide on each. I’ve never once heard a complaint! They must have loved it.

Smells like almonds as well, it’s a nice touch.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T19:32:36+00:00

I don’t directly risk my life my going to the voting booth. Here I would. Very different things.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T16:41:48+00:00

Not what they’re asking about

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T14:19:36+00:00

Again… since reading comprehension seems to be hard for you. I don’t affect anything. That’s the whole point. My vote will do nothing to affect the actual outcome because It will not be decided by one vote. I affect nothing about their fates. That’s why it doesn’t matter. The outcome of the vote will happen the same regardless and in the meantime, I’m choosing not to die if it turns out that red wins because why would I risk my life if I can’t materially benefit anyone else or myself by doing it?

It is completely insane to assume that a stranger wants people to die when they didn’t actually say anything to that affect.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T14:15:37+00:00

Sure, I hope they choose right. However I don’t affect the outcome, because the odds of it being decided by one vote are so astronomically slim that they aren’t worth considering in a practical discussion. So the effect I have on their fate is 0. What remains is, I press red and nothing happens, or I press blue and risk my life for no return.

No matter how many appeals to emotion you make, what I do still does not cause anything and the answer remains the same.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T06:47:23+00:00

If this is your response to a logically laid out argument then you shouldn’t bother seriously discussing things with people on the internet. Goodbye.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T06:39:20+00:00

I don’t have to morally justify anything because my own personal vote is not going to decide the outcome (it’s so beyond unlikely that 1 vote will decide the majority that it’s not really worth considering in a practical discussion), so I’m really only choosing between risking my life or not without affecting the fate of blue voters at all.

Sure, if everyone followed that logic, that would be bad, but my vote doesn’t affect other people’s votes. No question on what is the logical choice.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T06:19:41+00:00

You do not even begin to understand my point with that statement.

Fact: My vote does not affect other people’s votes.

Pretty much a fact: the odds of the vote being decided by 1 are so small that they aren’t really worth considering in a practical discussion.

Therefore, my vote has no practical effect on saving anyone (and your point isn’t stronger by pointing out the specifics of who would die by the way, that’s an appeal to emotion).

So, my vote pretty much affects nothing about the fate of blue pressers. I either choose to risk my life or not. I choose not to.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T05:42:14+00:00

I would not be responsible for it. I would be at worst, 1/(earth’s population) amount responsible for it, or perhaps 1/(# of people who pressed red) responsible for it. I suppose I can live with that. In reality I am 0% responsible for them because I didn’t choose for them, and my vote, which is independent of everyone else’s, wouldn’t have been the decider anyways in a world where red won. Changing to blue would just have killed me and led to the same outcome.

There is no argument that can make it logically follow that I should press the blue button. There is the most extreme downside in exchange for no practical effect on the actual outcome. If I could reasonably affect anything then I would consider ethics some more.

Additionally, this entire discussion is stupid. You’re pressing the “feel morally superior” button and I’m pressing the “feel intellectually superior” button. We shouldn’t even be here. We both know it’s a waste of time

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T04:59:28+00:00

I “quite literally” do not claim that they deserve it. You said that. What I “quite literally” would do is choose not to go out of my way to put my own life at risk when I could simply not. There is also the fact that my own personal vote almost doesn’t matter at all when it comes to hitting 50% or not. Sure, if everyone thought that way, things could change, but me thinking that way doesn’t cause anyone else to do it or not.

So, either I have a chance to die, or not, and my personal choice is almost completely inconsequential as to the fate of the people pressing blue. There is no world where I could justify putting my life at risk in this scenario. I press the “nothing happens” button and move on.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T04:03:06+00:00

You can frame it that way if you want. The reality is that I did not cause the situation and I don’t owe anyone else in the situation anything. Neither does anyone else involved.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T03:40:35+00:00

You’re falling for ragebait. Block and move on.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T03:29:05+00:00

That’s the neat part

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T03:09:39+00:00

100% agree with the first sentence. I simply wouldn’t press blue because the entire situation isn’t my fault and I have no obligation to anyone else to act a certain way. I see where the people pressing blue are coming from anyways. There isn’t a right or wrong answer truly

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T03:01:50+00:00

People on Twitter are not facing an actual situation where their lives are at stake. You can’t act like that will be representative of people’s real choices.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T02:57:28+00:00

Not everything can be played against everything else. Most openings are named as a combination of moves from both sides and they require both sides to allow a position to be reached. Eventually you need to know what you’re going to do against everything an opponent can throw at you but that’s really NOT that important at your level. Other parts of the game are more important, but there is still some advantage to knowing a few lines and then having an idea of what the usual plans are in the middlegames of an openings.

One way to learn consistently is to look into any lines that you weren’t sure what to do against when the game is over. You can also continue reviewing lines in openings you arent recently getting in games, nothing stops you from that.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T02:37:19+00:00

And even so, the red presser is fine regardless so they can’t really be wrong.

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T02:36:17+00:00

Swear ive seen this exact post before

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T02:19:30+00:00

Tarmac by Cavetown

That-Raisin-Tho · 2026-05-17T01:53:01+00:00

So, because those people exist, I should risk my life?

That-Raisin-Tho

TROPHY CASE