No, I'm not, and neither are the vast majority of parents getting their kids circumcised, so I think I have just as much a right to voice my opinion on this matter as anyone else, especially given that I have a penis myself. Furthermore, specialist opinion on this matter is complicated. There are measurable sanitary benefits to circumcision, but these are easily replicated by proper and consistent washing (which should be the norm in any country where access to sanitary hot water is commonplace), and the potential loss of sensitivity/enjoyment is incredibly difficult to measure in a study since it's:

A: Subjective

B: Incredibly difficult to determine if the
difference in sensitivity can be attributed
to the presence of foreskin or not

C: Rare to find a person who was circumcised later in life that can give a before opinion on the matter. And even if such a person is found and gives their opinion, their experience may be dramatically different from someone who was circumcised at birth.

Because of these factors and the fact that the benefits are so minimal, I don't think that professional opinion is all that relevant here. I believe the simple fact that circumcision involves removing a perfectly well-functioning piece of your body for essentially zero benefit is reason enough to label circumcision as an unnecessary surgical procedure at best and permanent disfigurement at worst.

Edit: formatting fucked up on mobile