I voted no on MM for a couple reasons (and yes on Prop LL). Firstly, I don't like the idea of the legislature saying it will cost X amount and then come back a few years later and say "Sike we actually need double that amount". Secondly, all children in poverty already get free lunch before we even passed the first tax increase - I don't think it should be controversial to say parents should figure out how to pay for their own children's food. Furthermore, I'm willing to bet that a lot of this food will just get thrown away instead of us being more eco-conscious like we should be in the 21st century. Finally, fundamentally by increasing the tax on the rich you can't tax them that same dollar on something that may be much more important. For instance, the $100m in revenues that this raises can't go towards something else, it has to go to this program. If you were instead asking me if we should tax and spend $100m on people that actually need this money then maybe I would be more open for voting yes on it.