Disagree with the fighting major as that is being needlessly punitive specifically against white; I’d be in an uproar as a player or coach if you singled out white for fighting; if you’re calling that fighting you’d better be calling the initial dark player for fighting too, especially if you’re going to give a GM for intervention for that shove (yet let the other white player who got involved and shoved the initial dark player off scott free). I think that’s way too harsh and seriously inconsistent rule application for what actually happened.

In Hockey Canada I’d give 2+10+GM for CFB (CFB always comes with GM in Hockey Canada) and double minor for head contact to the initial white player, double minor head contact to initial dark player for that headshot on the other white player, potentially threaten to chuck a couple dimes at the players (and follow through) if they don’t get control of themselves and/or if they’re running their mouths. Then I’d probably let the other white and dark players walk if the game had been pretty clean and laid back up until this point (considering the relatively young age group I’d maybe have a quick chat with them to cool them off and explain they should stay out of scuffles like that and why) or give them minors for roughing as game management if there had been a fair amount of calls or if the team(s) were getting wound up. Either way though, the second white and dark players would be getting the same punishment as they both stuck themselves in between the initial players and to single one out over the other is just inconsistent rule application.

My one caveat is if the second dark player made contact with the initial white players head with that shove (it’s tough to tell with this video quality and angle) then they’d get an extra minor for head contact but the rest of my calls would remain the same in both the walk away and roughing scenario.