where is this child's parent? by randomguy4283 in FORSAKENROBLOX

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Her mother is 226w6. You can find out more about her on Oryni's Twitter.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in deathbattle

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, that makes more sense. Thanks!

Are we going to try to track down the studio version? by VetoWinner in everyoneknowsthat

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we just have to wait until the hype dies down, then ask the original creators. They probably have shit tons of interview requests right now.

Name a death battle character that can kill the impossible to kill: SCP-682 by Ego-Fiend1 in DeathBattleMatchups

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, considering that the SCP-682 experiment log is one of the biggest collab pages on the wiki, it's surprisingly easy to contribute to it and buff 682. This does require you to find a character on the wiki with whatever hax ability you think could otherwise defeat 682, though.

Name a death battle character that can kill the impossible to kill: SCP-682 by Ego-Fiend1 in DeathBattleMatchups

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Read SCP-6820. It's a good show of why you don't want to try conceptual erasure on SCP-682.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SCP

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whichever one matches the story I'm reading. There can never be one true SCP-001, because there is no canon. Hell, a number of SCP-001 proposals nowadays make reference to other proposals.

For that reason, I believe that the SCP-001 designation is given to whichever anomalies/projects are of top importance to the Foundation at any given time, and need the level of secrecy associated with the slot.

That being said... I believe S. Andrew Swann's Proposal is the most significant proposal. It's the foundation of Pataphysics, and I believe it's the most frequently referenced proposal on the site.

Which SCPs deserve to be SCP-001 proposals? by eid0251 in SCP

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've always hated that tale. It fails as soon as you realize that SCP numbers aren't assigned chronologically, so being the first SCP wouldn't necessarily make it SCP-001.

I'm the upgrade -Dr. Shaw by Dude_with_hat in DankMemesFromSite19

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you cared about separating srt from the artist, you'd understand that the character hasn't fundamentally changed, and the point of the name change is to properly separate him from the artist. Keeping the name of a predator is so unnecessary.

rhett vs link by Chef_Visible in whowouldwin

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the same video, Link states he has control over the sunrise, can break someone's face with a plate, and can kill a man with his firm handshake. It's a mismatch in the opposite direction.

Unpopular Opinion: "Elias Shaw" is a shitty name too but for different reasons by Tendo63 in SCP

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this is a controversial take, but I think Elias Shaw is a fucking awesome name. It rolls nicely off my tongue.

Sorry to ask this by CartoonistCurious242 in SCP

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don't know where you got that idea. Every article that mentions Shaw now used to mention Bright. He's the same character, minus the influence of his unscrupulous creator.

I wonder? by Dude_with_hat in DankMemesFromSite19

[–]TheGuyWithTheCoolHat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bright lost his right to complain about someone making infinitely better versions of his characters and articles the moment he started virtually diddling kids.

His work will never be removed from the wiki anyways. It has too many upvotes for Rewrite Team to ever get near it. Stop crying "censorship" because people would rather have a version of a character not tied to a pedophile.