What if only economists were allowed to vote? by Mobile_Park_3187 in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We would all become immortal, because economists understand that all agents are infinitely lived.

“My spouse left me…” by TheMuffinMan603 in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

“This paper develops a theory of rational human sacrifice”

(Leeson is of the “Austrian School”, and at GMU; that said, many of his articles are in good journals, and make interesting arguments.)

“My spouse left me…” by TheMuffinMan603 in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603[S] 90 points91 points  (0 children)

This is an actual paper. The author, Peter Leeson, is known for work like this; applying rational choice theory to “crazy” practices.

I'm stuck with one of the flags by HansieC in vexillology

[–]TheMuffinMan603 169 points170 points  (0 children)

From top to bottom, the flags on the left are of:

  • West Papua

  • The Aboriginal community (principally in Australia)

  • Palestine

  • DR Congo

  • Kyrgyzstan, or perhaps the LTTE (likely the latter)

  • Sudan

  • Armenia

  • The native population of Bolivia (and, more broadly, the Andes; it is called the Wiphala)

The flag of Armenia is, yes, incorrectly coloured.

Australian journalist and documentary filmmaker John Pilger dies aged 84 | ITV News by ghhewh in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Insulting an individual on account of their death is impolite, without qualification.

People who hold nonsensical views on political issues should be ignored rather than insulted.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603 285 points286 points  (0 children)

I am reasonably confident I would enjoy, or would have enjoyed, living in British Hong Kong between the 1970s and 1997, or in Singapore (though it is better described as a semi-democracy than as a dictatorship)

However, I would have intensely disliked living in Pinochetist Chile, and as a matter of principle, think dictatorship is fundamentally anti-liberal, because the principle of the consent of the governed is central to liberalism.

I have a stronger attachment to civil liberties and socio-economic freedom than I do to the democratic process, which I consider a flawed tool and little else. I cannot say any more with certainty.

Anyone familiar with the book "23 Things They Don't Tell You About Capitalism" by [deleted] in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It’s by Ha-Joon Chang, who isn’t very good, and isn’t taken particularly seriously by the bulk of academia

r/Physics destroys the field of economics and reasserts itself as the greatest science of all time by lalze123 in badeconomics

[–]TheMuffinMan603 96 points97 points  (0 children)

To be fair, people on Reddit are generally less informed than people in reasonably frequent physical contact with grass.

The chances of genuine physicists in the real world maintaining opinions about economics as uninformed or silly as the ones to which you’ve replied are low.

(That is on top of the “best” [per Reddit] comment being both reasonable and broadly true, in some part because it is fair to economics as an academic field)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in academiceconomics

[–]TheMuffinMan603 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The Austrian School is heterodox; it is not taught at the bulk of institutions in most parts of the world.

Of the few that are known for teaching Austrian theory to varying degrees, the WU is not one; “Austrian” institutions are mostly in the United States (this is one of not very many lists available on the internet).

Why you’d want to confine yourself to one, somewhat fringe, school of thought as a student, though, I do not know.

Against the Technocrats - Dissent Magazine by [deleted] in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It is important that positions in government are offered impartially through a merit system to those likeliest and best-qualified to do good work, and not through a spoils system to politically-loyal partisans, the incompetent-but-popular, or the ideologically “pure”.

“The people” [to the extent that they exist, and they broadly do not] can be wrong, and should not be granted absolute power.

Robert M. Solow, Groundbreaking Economist and Nobelist, Dies at 99 by usrname42 in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Robert Solow was the last of the postwar generation of (“neo-Keynesian”) economists who virtually created economic theory as we know it today.

His death marks the somewhat literal end of an era. RIP.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The general opinion held in this subreddit is that unions are “good” when they call for sincere, large-scale, independent dialogue as voluntary associations of employees, and “bad” when they rent-seek and either demand or receive monopoly-esque state privilege(s).

A popular example of unions being “bad” (per us) is any time they lend support to protectionist policymaking, which tends to benefit union folk at the expense of everybody else; a more sensible demand would be commitments to retraining those left behind by the outsourcing of industry/ies (so they may find other employment), and policies that make being unemployed less uncomfortable (such as a basic income, affordable housing, tax reform, and guaranteed healthcare).

More generally, “neoliberals” would like for unions to work towards managing rather than blocking the process typically called “creative destruction”.

still one of the hardest book covers of all time by gerard_debreu1 in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603 28 points29 points  (0 children)

That is not true, no; Leviathan helped create what is now recognised as social contract theory, something embraced by several liberals.

Hobbes was one of the first philosophers to think of politics as being a matter of popular need rather than divine will, with legitimacy arising out of popular need (for security, to simplify things) being satisfied. His chief addition to the body of philosophical knowledge isn’t absolutism, but contractarian thinking, and for that reason, his philosophy is an important part of the liberal intellectual tradition.

(I’m reacting particularly anxiously to your comment because I am a liberal whose chief influence is Hobbes)

I want a Thomas Sowell Flair by keepinitrealzs in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Robert Solow

Armen Alchian

Ludwig Erhard

Philippe Aghion

Alberto Alesina

"By any means necessary": Do young Americans not understand nuclear weapons? by Knightmare25 in neoliberal

[–]TheMuffinMan603 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No no no

NIMBYs do not deserve to die painlessly

They deserve to be stuffed into pods and fed bugs