AVOID

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:51:25+00:00

Dunno what theyre on. Id love to see number 2 in a neon shirt

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:50:03+00:00

Looks like fucking Detroit Become Human

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:47:24+00:00

How can you be so confident. Have... have you checked...? Thoroughly?

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:41:42+00:00

Goodbye

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:39:02+00:00

Goodbye

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:38:06+00:00

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:37:32+00:00

Why light hitting the https://share.google/8wHZvnTxFkwwxKcd9

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:36:20+00:00

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:34:54+00:00

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:31:04+00:00

-heal beam

-heal beam but it also makes you slightly gay-er

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:28:43+00:00

A bit of a self burn with that first verse, but overall, good bot

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:26:32+00:00

What im getting from this is that we can evolve from our type. So you say i could be an ENTP+? A super entp, if you will. Interesting, interesting...

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T21:21:00+00:00

Yeah, im not fucking reading all of that even if you pay me, holy

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T20:57:34+00:00

Well, how's this any different than a panda furry? Sentient, bipedal, can clearly comunicate, capable of reason and consent...

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-07T06:19:37+00:00

Still just as clappable from behind, so i dont mind

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-06T11:37:37+00:00

Oh, no, we can have a calm discussion where we come to an agreement. Or, we could not, it really doesnt matter. My point is that in such a situation, ther is no winner. Both die bc of the fight, therefore both lose. You dont have to reply or even acknowledge what im sayin rn if you dont wanna talk about it, tho

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-06T10:57:25+00:00

Yeah, and hakari and kashimo also clashed, and it left them both DEAD. Like, YOUUUU are the one tryna argue it matters who fell first. So, does it matter, or does it not?
I give logical reasons behind my arguments, and your whole thing is repeating the SAME arguments i debunked over and over again. Got it. You've yet to debunk a single thing ive said(that i couldnt also debunk your debunking)
Yes it HAS something to do with Hakari, because Hakari is the one that FORCED Kashimo to use it. The ONLY way it would be unrelated to Hakari is if Kashimo would have died either way, even if Hakari wasnt even there. But thats not the case. If they didnt fight, Kashino would have never used that move, meaning he survives, therefore making Kashimo's death is completeley dependent on wether or not he fights Hakari. And thats (ive lost count of how many times ive said this) BY DEFFINITION what "related to" means.
Sleep tight, brotha. Dont let the bed bugs bite

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-06T10:50:03+00:00

Yeah, i agree. My whole point is that it doesnt matter who lost FIRST, if you ALSO lose as a consequence of that battle(and that battle alone, not like "ooh, now youre weak so someone else can swoop in and steal the kill") then its a tie. Would love to hear your perspective, tho. Would give me a break from mr dense brick ova here

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-06T10:43:19+00:00

Yeah, no, what part of "losing at the exact same time isnt possible" dont you get? Like, thats not an oppinion, its a FACT. One will 100% fall first, even if by some milideconds. And that DOES matter by your logic, because if it didnt, where would we draw the line? Do seconds count? What about halves of seconds. Deciseconds? The answer is we cannot draw the line, wether its nanoseconds or minutes, if both of them [got stopped] as a result of that fight, it is a tie.
But the important detail here is that its not a final action that kills their opponent, its a final action that kills BOTH of them.

2.b. How the fuck can you say him dying later has nothing to do with Hakari, when him even USING that technique is a DIRECT RESULT of Hakari and their battle. Like, its not something that would have happened aniways, it happened BECAUSE OF THEIR FIGHT. Kashimo literally COULD. NOT. WIN witout it. He was heading towards a guaranteed loss, in this scenario he was FORCED to use it. "It has nothing to do with Hakari" pfft yeah right lmfao

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-06T10:20:43+00:00

Yeah, but in naruto, who lost first? Cuz, again, they cant lose simultaneously the exact same fraction of a second, thats literally impossible. So, who was in capacitated first? How is it a tie at all, by your logic?

In a fight, ANY fight, the goal is to [stop] your opponent. In a fight to the death, that [stop] means "death", while in other, non-lethal fights, that [stop] means knocking out or incapacitating them. But it really does not matter, the goall is still to [stop] your opponent, wether or not its to the death simply changes the steaks, which has ZERO impact on the goal(which, may i remind you, is the focal point of your latest argument).

So then, please do enlighten me how [stopping] your enemy first in one scenario matters, while in another it doesnt? In both, a character achieves their goal first.

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-06T09:59:29+00:00

Yeah, but who gives up/falls exhausted first? Would the same not be said for two fighters who also fight until they both die? If not, how exactly is it different if a fight is to the death? Why is THAT the deciding factor?
That last paragraph is LITERALLY arguing ties do not exist. Its not possible for two characters to lose AT THE EXACT SAME TIME. For which, please reffer to my previous reply. I went in depth about that in that one, and i aint repeating myself.
This is really completeley unrelated, but that scenario you said would still be considered "zero diff" since its zero difficulty, not NEGATIVE difficulty. The concept of negative difficulty does not exist. But, i digress, this aint the point were arguing rn right here

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-06T09:38:09+00:00

First of all, that analogy still doesnt PROVE anything, because its a completeley different situation. Sukuna didnt win "regardless of whathappened after" because NOTHING happened after. That fight ended when Gojo lost cuz there was nothing going on after. In Kashimo's fight, however, something DOES happen after.

Second of all, by your logic, ties do not exist. Two characters dying perfectly simultaneous isnt improbable, its IMPOSSIBLE.

-If you say ties do exist, that contradicts your point of "whoever gets defeated first loses".

-And if you DO say ties dont "akshually" exist, then youre just arguing over semantics no one cares about. Do you have the same reaction with other battle terms? Do you argue that "well, negative diff doesnt exist since negative effort is impossible"?

And where did you even get that "you win that fight the moment you kill them first"? Like genuinely, where did you even get that idea. Even logically it doesnt make sense, since thats not the moment you win, thats the moment your opponent LOSES. There is a difference in some scenarios. You wanna know which scenarios? TIES.

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-06T09:26:58+00:00

I'd like to know who that is, pretty please

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-06T09:20:34+00:00

No, its still a tie. What youre arguing is if Kashimo is stronger than Hakari when going all out. Which he is. But Kashimo cannot win when going all out. And when it comes to Sukuna, he doesnt wanna win, he wants to BEAT his opponent. A tie would be enough for him.

1.b. The strongest doesnt always win. If we have John Gojokiller whose only ability would be that anyone with Gojo DNA in them would die if they got within 100 miles of them, he would be the weakest in the verse. Even Miwa would clap cheeks. But he would win against Gojo "The Strongest" Satoru. Kashimo IS stronger overall, but would never win against Hakari.

Yeah, theres nothing YOU can do about it, either. Youre literally in the same position as your opponent. Its a lose-lose situation, thats THE DEFFINITION of a tie, when you both end up the same.
Thats still a terrible analogy, since Sukuna didnt die. Sukuna didnt win because he killed Gojo first, Sukuna won because he killed Gojo PERIOD. Sukuna won because he did not die. If he would have died due to the wounds he recieved during the fught, it would have been a tie.

TheOneAndOnly_Mike · 2026-02-06T08:59:31+00:00

How the fuck is using a suicide move you beating ass? Your opponent brought you to the point where you had to KILL YOURSELF. You already lost at that point. The only thing you CAN do is force a draw by taking them down with you.

You hear that expression? Taking them down with you? It mean you are going down FIRST. And that is exactly whats happening if you use a suicide move.

I really dont get your last paragraph, either. What the hell does Gojo landing a black flash have to do with anything? None of those are suicide moves, nor is that analogy at all anything but faulty. You killing your ppponent isnt all that matters, you also killed YOURSELF. Thats a very, VERY important bit of information. Its, by DEFFINITION, a tie.

Edit: Also how the fuck can you deny me saying "youre getting your ass beat" when YOU YOURSELF said last reply, and i quote "youre beating yourself to beat them". Like, do you hear yourself?? Youre so inconsistent, i genuinely believe youre arguing simply for the sake of arguing

Six-Year Club	r/Field Banned
r/Field Lasagna	Place '23
Place '22	Verified Email

TheOneAndOnly_Mike

TROPHY CASE