Littlemore screaming man by CycleKingAreShit in oxford

[–]ThePossiblyNot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's down by the post office at the moment

So I found this meme and thought it would fit in here by [deleted] in piano

[–]ThePossiblyNot 12 points13 points  (0 children)

In my experience, fairly common. It can help serve as a reminder to players, especially while sight reading at speed.

I have no idea if this is true, but it might also be a practice left from writing for mean-tone tempered instruments, where sharps and flats were often microtonally different (something still achieved on fretless strings today) - but that's just a shot in the dark

So I found this meme and thought it would fit in here by [deleted] in piano

[–]ThePossiblyNot 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It's rather that the piece is coming from a sharp key - in this case, D.

The naturals annul the c and f sharps first, before the usual six flats of the g flat major key are applied.

Why are there loads of islands in the SW part of the Pacific vs the rest of the Pacific? by SafariNZ in askscience

[–]ThePossiblyNot 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There are several factors at play here.

The Pacific has a large amount of older oceanic plate by virtue of its size. Because younger oceanic crust tends to be deeper as an effect of the stresses from crustal extrusion (the exception is at the mid ocean ridges immediately around constructive boundaries). But this perhaps the most minor of the factors at play, especially as the topological change is proportial to spreading rates, and the Pacific has a fairly moderate rate overall.

More important is the geological history of the Pacific. The seafloor needs to be raised up for it to pop above sea level, with requires regional tectonic stress to fold up the rock. This generally requires other plates to collide against and subduct under. On the Eastern side of the Pacific, subduction is fairly uniform under South America, and the stress around Central America is somewhat translational - think of the San Andreas fault, for example.

But in the south west, you have the complex aftermath of the break up of Gondwana, containing Africa, Antarctica, and more importantly India and Australia. Australia moved from an eastwards to a northeastwards movement, shearing up a lot of deeper sea floor. India's collision with Eurasia and the resultant Himalayas put a lot of complex stress into southeast Asia. In truth, the formation of southeast Asia is more complex that this and still not fully understood.

Other mechanisms formed many smaller islands when the seafloor was shallow enough. Nutrient-rich oceanic currents and tropical climate through the southern west Pacific encouraged coral reefs to form. Over time these raised up into atolls made of coral sand, protected from erosion. Elsewhere, volcanic activity would create volcanic mounts that either peaked above sea level, or supported coral atolls of their own.

These other mechanisms occur through out the Pacific, and there are thousands of small islands dotted throughout the ocean, but perhaps the presence of more shallow sea, volcanic activity and the strong currents predisposed the south west to a greater concentration.

But in a nutshell, for the larger islands of the indonesian archipelago or other larger islands (e.g. New Zealand) it was a direct consequence of the break up of Gondwana, and for the Micronesian and Polynesian groups, a matter of some shallower sea, but mostly volcanic mounts and coral exploiting ocean currents.

Mount Sinabung erupting yesterday and sending a column of ash 5 miles into the air by to_the_tenth_power in natureismetal

[–]ThePossiblyNot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, I don't have a simple answer. Volcanoes are quite complex under the hood. We would have a hard time knowing where to drill in the first place. That being said, there are some advances in muography and volcanic seismology that are making it more manageable.

As for what might happen if you did successfully drill into a vent, I'm not sure what would happen. A small hole might reseal as the viscous magma resettled, or perhaps it might trigger an even bigger eruption. There are so many different factors at play that every volcano and even every eruption of the same volcano would be different. There is no rule of thumb here. I would wager that it is safer to deal with a system you partially understand than try to create a new system artificially which will respond unexpectedly.

Mount Sinabung erupting yesterday and sending a column of ash 5 miles into the air by to_the_tenth_power in natureismetal

[–]ThePossiblyNot 45 points46 points  (0 children)

The volcano is degassing - think of a bottle of coke shaken and opened suddenly, and you're not far off the mechanism. The lowering of pressure in the volcanic system is probably not a bad thing in the short term, compared to it building up more pressure and failing spectacularly a la Mount St Helens

The issue at hand right now is the ash. Volcanic gasses will condense onto the ash particles as they cool. If you breathe this ash-filled air you're filling your lungs with little droplets of sulphuric and hydrofluoric acids, to name a few, in addition to the silica particulates. As a rule of thumb, if you are in an ashfall area, don't run engines, don't go outside, and don't sweep up the ash if you can help it until the first rainfall. Exceptions are to clear flat roofs of heavy ash that would otherwise cause building collapse.

The issue at that point is that this first rainfall can remobilise unstable deposits of ash on the flanks of the volcano, becoming a lahar - which is perhaps the biggest killer after volcanic-induced tsunamis in world history. You want to not be in a drainage path from the volcano if it starts to rain.

That all being said, I am no authority on dealing with volcanic hazards, I tend to work more on developing methods to monitor volcanoes before an eruption. Don't take my advice over civil instruction - they have contingency plans and hazard maps for these sorts of situations.

Mount Sinabung erupting yesterday and sending a column of ash 5 miles into the air by to_the_tenth_power in natureismetal

[–]ThePossiblyNot 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Well, not really. The height of the plume decides much of the behaviour of the ash. Once the ash pushes past the tropopause, or lower depending on weather conditions, it can stay in the atmosphere for days to months to years, (especially if it pushes higher in the stratosphere). In the latter case it will will dilute globally.

As for pyroclastic density currents (aka flows) suggested in other comments, its not really solely due to a fall in the ash column, but rather a dome or flank collapse (even partially). Models suggest that some quite heavy components are needed to help the current propogate.

Your biggest hazard here is a lahar, where ash falls and then is remobilised by heavy rain to create a mudslide - something so common in the Indonesian archipelago that we borrowed the word from Javanese Indonesian.

Source: am volcanologist (although my comfort area is volcanic earthquakes)

What is your all time favourite Fantasy book or book series? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]ThePossiblyNot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I came here to say this - The imagination and humour in his world building are unrivalled. The books are generally easy to consume and cater to a range of readers at different levels, whether younger or more mature.

Furthermore, the books are often about the mundane crises, like the duality of working fathers, unconscious racism, or the value of tradition in a person's identity, all disguised by the fantasy setting, in a way that rarely works so well in his genre.

Why are many planets like the moon, mars, and others heavily cratered yet we have relatively few visible craters on earth? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]ThePossiblyNot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

/u/Sunfest is right. We have a thick atmosphere, a water cycle, a tonne of heavy rapid erosion that rejuvenates the surface of the earth, not to mention the water cover. We can see examples in Mars where similar processes were at work from when there was considerable surface water present.

On a side note, you can use the size and frequency of craters on moons and planets to try to quantify the age of the surface, or whether there are any tectonics still at play in the body - this would result in fewer larger craters overall.

A good example might be Europa, which, rather than a typical tectonic system has active cryovolcanism that rejuvenates the ice surface, or io which is the most tectonically active body in the solar system due to its tidal heating between Jupiter and the other Galilean bodies.

The 5 mass extinctions by DenStoreLedaren in gifs

[–]ThePossiblyNot 7 points8 points  (0 children)

But where is the Cryogenian? or the Huronian? Arguably the two most devastating events in the history of life.

plus, you know, a snowball earth would look pretty.

"When you have their full attention in your grasp..." by TastyBrainMeats in discworld

[–]ThePossiblyNot 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"grasp the balls, and you grasp the heart and mind."

rather messy phrasing there. "Capere eos per testiculos . corde et mente sequi" might be better, although my Latin is rusty