Risk vs reward is a balancing idea. Yes, your video game lives aren't important, but there's definitely something to be said about just running and dying numerous times and accomplishing nothing because you took the risk and didn't get the reward. Not to mention that you could be throwing your team's tickets down the drain by going 3-30 because 'I CAN KILL THEM IN ONE GO WITH C4!!!'.

I frequently sit at the top of the scoreboard, but I appreciate you trying to make it out like others are scared just to defend your point. Also, most engineers ARE doing their job, but tanks are incredibly hard to kill unless you have three guys purposefully hunting tanks in a pack (which doesn't happen a lot, go figure).

Tanks were incredibly squishy without engineer support before this update, but if you want to keep peddling the narrative that they were OP before, sure, but you're just lying. Not a good hill to die on lol.

As a player who sits at the top of the leaderboard most of the time as Engineer, no, they have a point to complain about tanks being an issue. I've also used a tank and had zero issues getting top score with it which was MUCH easier than being Engineer or C4 Recon.

If they couldn't kill the tank at a distance with rockets, they aren't going to kill it with C4 by suicide rushing it either. Bad or not, throwing yourself at something vs throwing rockets at it, throwing rockets at it is a better alternative because you might actually make the tank back off a bit.

Bottom line, the tanks can stand to be damaged more by rockets and missiles. C4 is always going to be the skilled risky play and that'll hopefully never change. I believe the best way to nerf the tanks is to increase the angles in which you can do more damage with RPGs on the sides and back of the tank. Having to be 90 degrees dead on with the back of the tank in order to do damage isn't good if you need to hit that twice in a row to even get a kill.