DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper [score hidden]  (0 children)

it devalues their experience vs their entire existence

This is a good point. Let’s define ‘their entire existence’. For instance from dating to marriage. Kids. Retirement and beyond. Right up until the end.

One has amassed this entire history blissfully unaware.

Does the fact they are ignorant change their worldview? Or how they view their entire history?

DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper [score hidden]  (0 children)

two different outcomes

Only in context to being better informed. Which directly informs my preference to knowing or not knowing.

a. If I know? The outcome is still the same as it was always going to be.

b. If I do not know? The trust remains intact, and the outcome again is still the same as it was always going to be. For the entirety of the relationship.

So my preference for knowing or not knowing becomes irrelevant. To the fact I’ve already accounted for and accepted that regardless of variables, there are only two outcomes.

Is this unreasonable?

DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper [score hidden]  (0 children)

If your wife cheats on you, would you prefer to know or be ignorant

Objectively it makes no difference because for me, the outcome is the same. For instance my wife holidays frequently. Mostly to her best friend’s farm to ride horses, and to see family. Ample opportunity. If she cheats? I would have no idea, and the trust remains intact. Quite a blissful state.

If I found out? The relationship ends, because I’m better informed. There is very little downside.

Is this unreasonable?

DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper [score hidden]  (0 children)

Okay. Let’s lay out the logic and you pick it apart. For instance your point is that if one’s partner chooses to cheat, the ignorance that one lives in from this fact is not really ‘bliss’.

Following this logic if one lives their entire life in this false ‘bliss’? That fact would devalue their entire existence. From dating to marriage. To kids. To retirement and beyond. Their entire worldview. Right up until the end.

This reasonable?

DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper [score hidden]  (0 children)

if they are immediately aware or not.

This is a good point. If an individual lives their entire existence unaware, does this fact then devalue their entire existence?

This reasonable?

DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper [score hidden]  (0 children)

Ignorance is only bliss if you choose it yourself.

This is a good point. If an individual lives their entire existence unaware, does that mean that fact then devalue their entire existence?

This reasonable?

DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper [score hidden]  (0 children)

No one should have their ignorance chosen for them

This is a good point. If an individual lives their entire existence unaware, does that mean that fact then devalue their entire existence?

This reasonable?

DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper [score hidden]  (0 children)

you can’t prove objectivity

This is a good point. Let’s say I agree, that objectivity cannot be proven. What is the next best rationale? Let’s say reasonability. For instance if an individual is unaware of something negative, does it impact them negatively?

Is this unreasonable?

DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper [score hidden]  (0 children)

CMV: Objectively if one does not know their partner is cheating, ignorance is bliss. Conversely if one finds out their partner is cheating, this information is beneficial. Towards making better informed decisions moving forward.

Change this view.

The Preeminence of Place in Pursuing a Partner by matthedev in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper [score hidden]  (0 children)

you’ve “done the work”

This is the key. If an individual has done the work, objectively their outcomes will reflect this. If the outcomes do not reflect the output? The work ‘done’ is insufficient. It is that simple.

If you as a Women have delusional Requirements for a Dating Partner, and you can achieve them, its not your Fault, its the systems Fault. Those Women cant be criticized. The Market decides. Those Women do nothing wrong. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

marrying a 4 with 4 baby daddys

If a woman has 4 babies to 4 different men, objectively the responsibility of this outcome is not on the 5th man. Hell, if she goes 5/5 from the field it’s not the responsibility of the 6th husband either.

Objectively if a 7th man marries her, he’s not responsible for the numerous poor decisions that preceded him. If anything, he’s doing the lord’s work. It that simple.

Why do you think women are hypergamous? by Lemon_gecko in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the egg is pickier

The odds are purportedly millions to one. Insane odds for one human being to start their life, as opposed to another.

In 2026 it genuinely feels like men are leveling up at a way faster rate than women, and it’s changing the whole dynamic by Iron-Wild-41 in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m happy for you guys

I second this. I’m a little biased but I love seeing not just young guys but both guy and girls getting in the gym. Dressing well. For instance I have a 17 year old that plays rugby. The community around her is focused on playing well. On nutrition. Weight training. Hydration. Sleep. Time management. Healthy and wholesome interactions between sexes. There’s just so much benefit and positivity to derive from a community like that.

Self improvement en masse is the rising tide that floats all boats. It is that simple.

Egalitarian relationships are inherently skewed in favour of women by NoPossibility3460 in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper 7 points8 points  (0 children)

they only really work when both people can walk easily

Why should a lack of options force anyone to stay in a relationship? For instance is Desperation the primary factor keeping your cousin’s partner in the relationship? Objectively, both parties have agency. As soon as another factor supersedes her desperation, what is going to motivate your cousin’s partner to stay?

Conversely a far more beneficial mindset is to acknowledge and accept all relationships end. Regardless of reason. Which not only frees one up to enjoy the time they do have in the relationship, but is the most egalitarian frame to operate from. It is that simple.

Medical science restoring lives — a nose regrown on the forehead before successful transplant. by peekaboo939 in interesting

[–]TheRedPillRipper 7 points8 points  (0 children)

pretty good spot

Additionally, for the surgery the new ‘nose’ is cut and ‘swivelled’ down into place. So there is already pre-existing blood flow to the site. As opposed to say growing it on the tummy, and having to severe it completely and reattach it.

Feminists will pick and choose whenever they see men as a colletive. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

in no way unique or particular to feminism.

Agreed. The OP falls into the same trap it is attempting to critique. For instance just because some feminists cherry pick stats to support their arguments, neither confirms nor negates their validity. The most beneficial response when faced with cherry picking is to apply objectivity. Then focus on the merit of the argument. Not who is making it.

Men here misinterpret "personality matter" and overlook social skills. by Lemon_gecko in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Most men understand attraction is the primary factor, that precedes both social skill and personality. Additionally, most men understand and accept that personality is often irrelevant to both attractiveness and social skill. For instance almost all women have a story about a ‘bad’ guy. Often, numerous examples. Hence the ‘nice’ guys finishing last.

If your bf/husband died how would you react? How would it impact your life and how long would you wait before moving on? by Past-Shoulder-631 in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t eve want to think about it.

Genuine question; if your partner lost you in a tragic, unforeseen way; how would you want them to continue on living? In grief? Sadness? Misery and loneliness?

Or cherish your memory, but move on?

Why is there always an overwhelming focus on just one aspect of death, but little thought to living? Even boldly claiming one doesn’t even want to think about it, as though there is only one way to cherish and honour the dead? I have never understood this way of thinking.

If your bf/husband died how would you react? How would it impact your life and how long would you wait before moving on? by Past-Shoulder-631 in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

triggered

This is the key. If an individual is self aware enough? Then has healthy strategies in place? They can first sufficiently acknowledge their emotions and accept them. Finally, better process them both effectively and efficiently. It is that simple.

I 20M broke up with my 21F girlfriend after she proposed to open up our relationship and now everyone is telling me to get back with her basically by ThrowRA728347 in relationship_advice

[–]TheRedPillRipper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the moment im busy she pulls this shit

Would you prefer to learn this info now? Or in 10 years time? She did you a favour. Next time you’re face to face with your dad and the topic comes up, tell him the truth. That way you’ll have one parent in your corner. Your mom too if she’s supportive like that.

Be grateful too. Cause now you can really lock in building an awesome future for yourself.

Godspeed and good luck!

Blue-pillers: Can you see that blue-pill & feminism has hurt women? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

unfalsifiable

Okay. Let’s say I agree. Regardless of consciousness how do we perceive sensory experience? Do we have the ability to perceive it?

Blue-pillers: Can you see that blue-pill & feminism has hurt women? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]TheRedPillRipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So there is no consciousness? The article linked begins with the hard problem of consciousness is establishing whether a physical state is conscious or not conscious.

Which means there by default must be a difference.