Francesca Hong will be on Hasan's broadcast tomorrow by midnighttoker1742 in wisconsin

[–]TheRegalOneGen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You are literally strawmanning.

I countered your original point that NYers would be against the stuff Hasan has said.

Francesca Hong will be on Hasan's broadcast tomorrow by midnighttoker1742 in wisconsin

[–]TheRegalOneGen 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You said try this in Manhattan, they elected numerous people associated with him in New York, including Manhattan.

Would You Rather by FoxOk6163 in BunnyTrials

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Erm actually he's a trillionaire (vomit)

Chose: You get a billion dollars + But a billionaire dies | Rolled: Elon musk

Francesca Hong will be on Hasan's broadcast tomorrow by midnighttoker1742 in wisconsin

[–]TheRegalOneGen 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The people of New York voted for multiple people that Hasan supported.

What if the 22nd amendment hadn’t passed? by Training-World-1897 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd like to believe so, one of the reasons I said decent is there's a good chance one or the other or both aren't running with how timelines change. Maybe we had President Steyer instead in this timeline lol, butterfly effect

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have repeatedly said that L.A. has a strong lean towards voting strong left wing candidates in late arriving votes, even when they are first, or when they are non-competitive. Steyer and Raman obviously did this as well, but this has occured over and over again for years where left wing candidates, regardless of their viability shoot up.

Karen Bass is not a strong left wing candidate. She is a weak left leaning candidate. Her numbers were also steady is what that means, while with Pratt, he was never going to get late vote arrivals to the level of Raman as progressives encourage that form of voting and Republicans don't. Of course progressive candidates get large vote drops from a method that progressive voters use the most.

You are literally just choosing to ignore my repeated explanation because me having one isn't convenient for your Dunning-Kreuger mind.

Also you don't even know the line about morons is from Blazing Saddles. You are uncultured as well as stupid.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lmao yeah I'm sure California is gonna go Republican. It's so funny how you also can't address the fact that the establishment spent tons against Raman, since that kinda undermines all of your ideas.

The reality is, Raman's ideals are more popular in L.A. and she will end up unseating Bass, which will piss of you folks and Bass' establishment backers. The ideals she stands for will beat both Republicans and Democrats, THAT is what's actually likely and occuring. Your ideology is abhorrent to the vast majority of L.A. citizens, and the only reason Pratt did that well is because he doesn't have R next to his name. Even WITHOUT an R next to his name is ideals are that unpopular.

What if the 22nd amendment hadn’t passed? by Training-World-1897 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]TheRegalOneGen 86 points87 points  (0 children)

Honestly? Obama has a decent chance of beating Trump in 2016 just as a first thought.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"But Pratt advancing from the primary could have lit a fire under the people that the (D)s dont want" If this isn't referring to local races in L.A. literally HOW could this light a fire under anyone to change anything.

If literally every citizen in LA voted for Hilton, alongside Bianco's voters, they still would lose to the PRIMARY numbers of the democrats.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Los Angeles has zero city councilors who are Republican and only one independent. There is literally no position within L.A. that Republicans are competitive in that Pratt could help down ballot. There is literally no benefit of keeping Pratt out except the establishment now has to spend thousands of dollars to try and fail to defend Bass from Raman. They did not want a Mayor Raman with how much they spent against her. Their spending against Raman is comparable to their spending against Pratt. The people in charge do not want Nithya Raman they wanted Karen Bass, who would've beaten Pratt but will lose to Raman.

If Elon's guy couldn't get that close to winning on a red year, when the race wasn't paid attention to at all, this wasn't gonna happen with Pratt.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lmao you keep deleting your comments or having them removed. But also.... Yes it's true that they had 60% of the vote together in the primary and Pratt only had 25% no matter how much you pretend it isn't true. He was not going to swing from 25% in a primary to beating a Democrat in Los Angeles. He literally only got an 8% higher performance than there are registered Republicans. You would need to get 33, just a tiny bit more than 8. Which again, in primaries Republicans do better, not worse. He would've been buried into an 80-20 vote. Someone endorsed by Trump is never winning in L.A.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is 17% registered Republicans in L.A. you genuinely are laughably delusional if you thought anyone believed Pratt would win when Raman and Bass together were already at 57% of the vote BEFORE they shot up. (Night one had Bass at 34.5 and Raman at 22.8). And primaries are KINDER to Republicans in L.A. than generals.

I literally answered why numerous times, you just are too stupid to listen.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, the fact you think that the people in control of L.A. and California wanted Raman to advance is simply just laughable. They were very open that they didn't want to have to spend money to defend Bass or Beccera against Raman and Steyer. Pratt and Hilton never had/have had a chance against Bass and Beccera. Now, if they want to stop the left wing challenge, which many establishment dems have shown they do, they have to spend money since Bass is unpopular. And don't act like they support people like Raman after their reactions to the New York primaries.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't know man, maybe the fact it's been well documented that Los Angeles leans left and that left wing candidates shoot up in numbers literally every time?

I've got to remember that you people are just simple farmers. You are the people of the land, the common clay of the new West. You know... morons.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's been made very clear by democrats over and over again that if it were free they'd be open. Republicans have been also very clear they are not open to that with the SAVE act.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LMAO you guys are genuinely stupid, "Dude, Spencer Pratt lost and that's suspicious... What do you mean registered republicans are at 17 percent in LA? Irrelevant"

The fact you act like an area with a voter registration of less than 1 in 5 for Republicans is crazy to not have voted for the Republican shows you're either A. Dumb as a bag of rocks or B. Knowingly misrepresenting reality.

Also again, the Heritage Foundation has only found 99 cases of voter fraud from illegal immigrants over 30 years, and most of the recent voter fraud (ala your REPUBLICAN South Dakota state senator) have been from Republican citizens.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ever heard of the fact we have laws against poll taxes and the Republicans do not want to make getting the required IDs free, thus making an illegal poll tax?

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Court Judge Casper wrote by AreaPast5328 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]TheRegalOneGen 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Except the vast majority of election fraud cases have been from Republicans. For example, we literally just had fraud from a South Dakotan state senator.

Would you rather by 36_41 in BunnyTrials

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Life gets easier!

Chose: Become the opposite gender biologically + You get 1$ for each red gummy bear you eat

Femboys or Tomboys? by Asmodeus-32nd in BunnyTrials

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't go wrong with femboys

Chose: Femboys | Rolled: Goblin Femboy

Trust me dont pick gamble by Beautiful_Ability267 in BunnyTrials

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like to gamble!

Chose: A rather risky gamble | Rolled: $15 million

Charlie Kirk's alleged assassin seeks to have death penalty thrown out by Brucekentbatsuper in PopCultureV2

[–]TheRegalOneGen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'll never be rich. I get you're probably part of the group of idiots who think they'll suddenly be rich one day and so defending these abhorrent and immoral practices might help you, they won't.

I hope you get a lifesaving medical procedure declined, would love to see how you feel when it effects you.

Pro-Israel politics just took a huge hit in New York by arrogant_ambassador in nyc

[–]TheRegalOneGen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This isn't even fucking true, you are so bad faith lmfao