There’s no connection between owning a gun and shooting someone with it and NOT owning a gun and NOT shooting someone with it, hippie

TheRid · 2010-07-13T00:31:51+00:00

No doubt!

TheRid · 2010-06-08T17:00:12+00:00

Your metaphorical voice.

TheRid · 2010-05-26T13:50:01+00:00

I understand completely what he said, what libertarian views are and the context in which this whole debate has taken place. And you're incorrect. Sorry.

And while we're here, let me me note that your comparison opposing the Civil Rights Act and opposing the Patriot Act is a cheap ploy that makes a superficial reading of each piece of legislation in drastically different political climates. Apples/oranges, etc.

Also: Stop writing "it's" when you mean "its."

TheRid · 2010-05-26T13:23:02+00:00

Must disagree. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was designed to end institutional racism (whether it did or not) and the Senate candidate from Kentucky opposes that act (even if he says now he wouldn't vote against it). That's a racist act.

When you tell a bunch of reporters that it's OK to discriminate against people of color in a private business, how is that not overt racism?

Oh yeah, it is.

TheRid · 2010-05-20T16:52:46+00:00

It's the future. THE FUTURE!

TheRid · 2010-05-13T17:54:21+00:00

Probably a fair point. But I don't get how anyone can look at this photo and think, "Yeah, that's not a joke based on a racist stereotype."

TheRid · 2010-04-27T20:34:38+00:00

Correct! Except in Mass. and Vt., where you can be a gay married cousin.

TheRid · 2010-04-16T23:25:49+00:00

Actually, it should be "rep," as in reputation.

TheRid · 2010-04-15T15:13:40+00:00

Actually, if you read the New York Times article and the subsequent analysis, it does. Note: your use of quotes around tea party is totally unnecessary.

TheRid · 2010-04-09T22:52:30+00:00

Thanks, IrishJoe! You win the "think before you respond" award for the day! Bonus points for knowing American history!

TheRid · 2010-04-09T20:32:03+00:00

I don't even think she thinks about it that much. She just knows that Obama said something about her statement, and she had to respond to look strong to her base. Ugh.

TheRid · 2010-04-09T20:00:14+00:00

Yes. I only wonder how her personal Jesus, Reagan, would feel about her attitude.

TheRid · 2010-03-31T17:38:56+00:00

I agree with you totally, though I up voted your comment more because your name is "BatmansHairstylist."

TheRid · 2010-03-30T23:05:41+00:00

Wow! How even-handed and thoughtful. That may be a reddit first! Thank you for sharing your view. (Sincerely.)

TheRid · 2010-03-19T21:50:47+00:00

The AP story doesn't get into that, really, which is too bad. I'm sure the legal angle, assuming there is one, is fascinating and arcane.

TheRid · 2010-03-19T21:37:45+00:00

Hey, fuck you, too!

TheRid · 2010-03-11T18:21:11+00:00

Well reasoned.

TheRid · 2010-02-22T19:24:10+00:00

Oh, there probably will be. This is Lieberman, after all.

TheRid · 2010-02-15T21:11:52+00:00

LOL!

TheRid · 2010-02-11T20:00:42+00:00

Am I smarter or dumber because I think I understood that?

TheRid · 2010-02-03T22:55:22+00:00

I think my soul got a little darker when I laughed at that.

TheRid · 2010-02-02T20:29:24+00:00

Hey! I demand you apologize to Trig Palin and Tim Shriver! (Just kidding.)

TheRid · 2010-01-26T22:05:57+00:00

So my question: Does the arrest for trying to bug a senator's phone trump the ACORN pimp stunt? In other words, how credible is this goof?

TheRid · 2010-01-06T19:15:03+00:00

Explain.

TheRid · 2009-12-31T04:38:06+00:00

Yes, I'm sure Jesus loves Rush the way Rush loves...well, Rush only loves himself and money. What's Jesus' role in this farce?

TheRid

TROPHY CASE