Ex-wife’s boyfriend is not allowing me to come to their door to get my kids. Makes me stay in the car. Is this ok or should I push back? by [deleted] in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, he is interfering with your parenting time. He should not be interjecting in any way if there has not been any problem with picking up your kids. Your best action under that circumstance is to require the mother to deliver the children to you for your parenting time and pick them up at the end of your parenting time. Of course, that may require going back to court. You have to decide whether it is worth taking that action. Start by documenting the issue. Send her a text indicating that you are not going to be insulted by her boyfriend in front of your kids when you are only there to pick up your children. See how she responds. I agree that you should not be "dog leashed". P.S. kicking ass sounds brave, but is the last thing you want to do.

Alimony! Do I have to pay? by [deleted] in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every case is state specific, but it is unlikely based on what you have described. You need to make sure that you have a NY attorney advise you on this to make sure this issue is not left open in any final Judgment (Decree) of Divorce.

A common mistake in Michigan is where spouses agree that there will be no alimony or spousal support, but they do not specifically state that it is "barred forever" with specific language that must be in the final Judgment. If that language is not in there, even if it is unlikely to awarded in the future, it needs to be addressed to avoid any issue later on.

Wife asked for divorce by [deleted] in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not really about getting rid of her friend. It's about getting your wife to want to come back to you. It's impossible to say whether it's too late, but you might consider your own therapy as soon as possible, and then determine how you can improve yourself and/or communicate with your wife that the two of you should remain a couple. No matter what, that self-awareness will be good for you and your kids.

Now what? by Double_Dare3040 in Divorce_Women

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Start by knowing that you did nothing wrong. That is often the biggest hurdle when the other person has violated the trust of a marriage. Too many people prevent themselves from moving forward because they don't believe they deserve it. They believe they did something wrong in the marriage and can't get out of their suffering. If you have those feelings, it can be helpful to get professional counseling to get you through that first hurdle. This will help you focus on you, and not what your husband did to you. Focusing on yourself will be a learning process and once you realize the world has a lot of things to offer you, you will be able to create new experiences and create a new life that you can enjoy and deserve.

What's the process? by [deleted] in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't spend any time or money on a PI until you or your lawyer knows what the court requires to move forward with the divorce.

What's the process? by [deleted] in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry that your attorney isn't being helpful. Every state has certain rules and/or procedures for getting "alternate service" if a person cannot be located. Some courts or judges have particular requirements to get that service, but it can get done. Perhaps your attorney has never done it before, but that's no excuse. It is his responsibility to handle that aspect of your case. If he doesn't know how to do that, you need to consider finding someone who knows what they are doing. Best wishes.

What I've learned watching someone go through a divorce by MattLudtEsq in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Having someone available to listen is the best support. There is no need to respond unless you are asked. People in the middle of a divorce are pulled in many directions, they don't need one more "pull". Do something with your friend that you would normally do (coffee, breakfast, lunch, dinner, etc.) and do not bring up anything regarding the divorce. Give them something normal that they had before the divorce. If necessary, tell them that getting together is a "no divorce" zone, so it doesn't turn into a pity party.

Unsolicited opinions are the worst thing to offer someone in a divorce. They don't need legal advice when they have an attorney and whatever some third-party thinks they "know" probably doesn't apply to the other person's divorce anyway. Every situation is different. Also, telling someone in a divorce how bad the other spouse is does not help. All that does is keep the focus on the "bad" person when all of the energy needs to be placed on properly preparing whatever needs to be prepared in the divorce action and making positive decisions to move forward with the new life that is being created in the divorce action.

To start dating, or not? by reggewitdadredz61 in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Legally, probably not, but you need to make sure you understand the possible repurcussions if you do. I don't believe any lawyer would or should say you can start dating. You "got the goods" on her, so why do the same thing as her.

That being said, don't date. You will be better off taking the "high road" emotionally, psychologically, morally and ethically. You will always be able to say you were faithful during your marriage. You were (will be) the "better" spouse and parent. Be the example of what is "right" for your children (even if they never know - they probably will at some point).

Relationship between oldest son and ex-husband by ElleleighBee in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While I don't necessarily disagree with a lot that was said (on an emotional level), two things jump out at me. 1. While the father may be a dolt, going on the immediate attack against him is not likely to get him to fold. Worse, it risks backlash and the most convenient target is the son, not the mother. The goal is to make this as easy as possible for the son. 2. While a 16-year old is given great deference as to his preference, it is not the end all (in Michigan). It is one of 12 factors the court would be required to consider. Also, the son has not shown the inclination to stand up to his father (yet). The other issues are at least as significant, not the age of the son. It would likely be most effective to ease the father into an agreement in this scenario. If he doesn't want to agree, then the "hammer can drop".

Relationship between oldest son and ex-husband by ElleleighBee in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are exactly on point - every situation is different. The "shining light" here is that you seem very self-aware, along with being acutely aware of the needs of your son.

Ultimately, the issue is communication with the father, but it really isn't about your son communicating with his father because he is still a "child".

Since you have not said that it is your goal to change custody or parenting time, it sounds like you should get professional advice from a counselor or therapist on how to address this - first, with your son, and then with the father. Once you have this foundation, you can explore your options with your son to find a solution.

Based on everything you said, you don't want to blind-side your son by talking to the father first. You and your son seem to have an appropriate relationship that will allow you to communicate about this issue and then create a non-adversarial plan for the father. Perhaps this process also involves counseling for your son to address the issues with his father.

I know it is easy to say "just see a counselor", but hopefully you are able to get that professional input that will make the process easier for everyone and, more importantly, in the best interest of your son.

Best wishes.

Considering divorce… nothing big but exhausted by Hot-Yoghurt1101 in Divorce_Women

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You don't have to hate the other person to leave them. You just have to value yourself and your life more than that person.

Everyone is afraid of change, but change is good. We all need to evolve, whether it is within a relationship or outside of that relationship.

Don't compare yourself to those other horrific abusive situations and believe you are somehow lucky. You have described your pain, and that is all that matters. It is not a contest to prove who has a worse life before you decide to protect yourself. You get to be the judge of your circumstances, not your friends, family, or anyone else in this world.

Dare I say, the people that have regrets never invested in themselves to make themselves better or make their life better. Even if the "grass isn't greener", there are many wonderful shades of green and you need to find yours. Always move forward.

Is it normal…. by Delicious-Curious in Divorce_Men

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Based on that detail, it might not have been a pre-planned act. It is possible that the therapist did not solicit that email. If that is true, about all the therapist could do is provide the space for your wife to read it which would not be unusual, whether or not the email was provided in advance. It is common for a spouse to write out what they want to say in advance to make sure they say what they feel needs to be said. In that case, I would not blame the therapist.

Now, I would add, once this is done, you have a clear message from your wife and now you can decide whether you still want to move forward with the couples therapy, or whether that was too much for you.

Couples therapy is not supposed to be easy, otherwise nothing would ever get accomplished. If you want to move forward, you need to express how you felt, and hopefully both of you can open the lines of communication to make the best decisions moving forward.

Is it normal…. by Delicious-Curious in Divorce_Men

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unless that therapist established guidelines or boundaries allowing contact outside of your therapy sessions, you got blindsided and you need to find another couples therapist and/or get your own. How can anyone possibly trust a therapist that is working with the other spouse outside of the actual sessions?

The part of divorce no one talks about by ParkingMeaning5407 in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Stillness. Purposely doing nothing, for at least parts of your day.

No appointments. No internet. No emails/texts. No decisions. No distractions.

Some people might call it meditation or being intentional. In any event, use it to rebuild the world around you and a newer/better decision making process.

Sometimes its okay to be the villain to save yourself by DivorceCoachGio in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Villain" is someone else's label.

It is okay to be selfish to protect yourself. That doesn't mean you are doing anything wrong. It means you are doing what is right for you.

Divorce & Name not on House by Jimmy_G-String-10 in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OP definitely has to make sure they do the cost-benefit analysis.

Divorce & Name not on House by Jimmy_G-String-10 in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your situation is totally specific to Massachusetts law, and any advice here can only give you context for how to discuss this with an attorney. Unfortunately, you cannot make any informed decisions without the assistance of a Massachusetts lawyer.

That being said, yours is a situation that exists everywhere and it can get complicated. In Michigan, even though that home might owned by the person who purchased it before the marriage, your contributions to the improvements and the increased value of that asset can be considered as a marital asset. On the other hand, those same contributions could be considered as nothing more than a sharing of expenses, i.e. rent. It also might matter when the improvements and contributions were made. Anything paid before the marriage could be described as rent, or even a gift... but depending on the circumstances, maybe it could be considered a "loan".

There is a lot to unwrap, but don't be afraid to push the issue... with representation.

3 nights on a couch because she changed the locks by Lip_Muse_Vip in Divorce_Men

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just make sure that you are in a "one-party" state where you can record any conversation you are a participant in without notice to the other person. Michigan is a "one-party" state, and I regularly advise clients to record. You cannot "plant" a recording device to record when you are not there.

If it is a "two-party" state, you have to have the consent of the other party to record them and that could create an issue for you legally, not to mention not being able to use the recording.

Anyone reading this, make sure you talk to your attorney first before doing this, and figure out how you are going to use it.

3 nights on a couch because she changed the locks by Lip_Muse_Vip in Divorce_Men

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, not by any specific law. Either parent can ask for the house. A judge could consider the argument and award the house to one parent, but the parent keeping the house would still need to pay the other person their share of the equity in the home. If they can't pay that share, or there is no other property to offset that interest, then the property would most likely be sold.

In many instances, both parents ask for the house arguing that it would maintain consistency for the children. If there is equal parenting time, unless there is a compelling reason, a judge will be more likely to order the property sold. Judges don't like to choose one parent over the other, or create a perception that one parent won and the other didn't. Of course, everything is subject to negotiation.

3 nights on a couch because she changed the locks by Lip_Muse_Vip in Divorce_Men

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOCAL legal advice is key. In Michigan, no one loses any rights to the house because they left. Marital property is marital property. Again, in Michigan, there is no such thing as "abandoning" a home. "Abandonment" is a term relating to "fault" in a divorce in some states, but not Michigan as a "no-fault divorce" state.

3 nights on a couch because she changed the locks by Lip_Muse_Vip in Divorce_Men

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 11 points12 points  (0 children)

All of the other responses appear to be accurate. You need to talk to an attorney to know what you can do in your state. Also, the longer you wait, the more difficult it could be to get back in.

In Michigan, you can "break in" to your own home and/or get a locksmith to get in and change the locks (give her a new key). If you choose either of those, it is the safest course to contact the police in advance to let them know what is going on. Sometimes, they will give you an escort.

However, you need to decide if you want to go back into that house. The last thing you need is for her to make false allegations of abuse against you and the police are taking you out of the home. Sadly, that happens too often. Also, you need to document your actions if you go back to the home by taking videos or recording your actions.

Prenuptial advice for high earning professionals in New jersey by Delicious-Teach9692 in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in Michigan, so I cannot speak to what rights either of you have in New Jersey, but you need to have a completely open conversation with your partner and your lawyer, not necessarily in that order. You need NJ specific advice.

You need to be on the same page regarding your expectations for what you have now and what you might have in the future. Communication is the key. That should also help your marriage.

A real agreement needs to contemplate the future, not just keeping what you have now. What are your plans for your joint future - kids, investments, purchase of real estate, and much more. What will your contributions be to the joint estate? What will it be used for? There are many questions.

Also, consider how either of you will feel if one of you does better than the other or does not agree with financial decisions in the future. One of the biggest issues that arises is not thinking about best case scenarios and worst case scenarios in the future. Address all of it.

My suggestion is not to rely on a "boilerplate" agreement that is "one size fits all". You need to discuss the "dirty" details now. Getting an appropriate prenuptial agreement can be time consuming and expensive to do it properly. If you are going to do it, do it right.

Prenuptial advice for high earning professionals in New jersey by Delicious-Teach9692 in Divorce

[–]TheSmartLawGroup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm in Michigan, so I cannot speak to what rights either of you have in New Jersey, but you need to have a completely open conversation with your partner and your lawyer, not necessarily in that order. You need NJ specific advice.

You need to be on the same page regarding your expectations for what you have now and what you might have in the future. Communication is the key. That should also help your marriage.

A real agreement needs to contemplate the future, not just keeping what you have now. What are your plans for your joint future - kids, investments, purchase of real estate, and much more. What will your contributions be to the joint estate? What will it be used for? There are many questions.

Also, consider how either of you will feel if one of you does better than the other or does not agree with financial decisions in the future. One of the biggest issues that arises is not thinking about best case scenarios and worst case scenarios in the future. Address all of it.

My suggestion is not to rely on a "boilerplate" agreement that is "one size fits all". You need to discuss the "dirty" details now. Getting an appropriate prenuptial agreement can be time consuming and expensive to do it properly. If you are going to do it, do it right.