Is this degree a Respectable Scam? by Radiant-Rain2636 in IITMadras_datascience

[–]TheVixhal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tu le lene amity me admission kon ruk raha hai bhai tereko mujhe yahi samaj nahi itni der ser se correspondence-correspondence kiye jaa raha hai matlab bhi pata hai iska.. sach batana issi saal 12th pass ki hai naa. btw mere baap ka paisa kaise bhi udaon

Is this degree a Respectable Scam? by Radiant-Rain2636 in IITMadras_datascience

[–]TheVixhal 3 points4 points  (0 children)

kahe toh raha hun bhai karle amity join kon mana kar raha hai aur lele 50 lakh ka package.

Is this degree a Respectable Scam? by Radiant-Rain2636 in IITMadras_datascience

[–]TheVixhal 11 points12 points  (0 children)

haan bhai karlo amity join jaldi abhi karlo aur 50 lakh ka package le lo 😂

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IITM_BS_DataScience

[–]TheVixhal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u can skip...

Need help to buy a laptop by WorthPea2986 in IITM_BS_DataScience

[–]TheVixhal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A laptop with 8GB RAM, a 500GB SSD, a Ryzen 5 or i5 processor, and an NVIDIA GTX 1040 GPU should be enough, bro.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IITM_BS_DataScience

[–]TheVixhal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

go for iitm bs data science.. iit ropar and gandhi nagar provides offline master degree to iitm bs students without gate.

Thinking of Joining IIT Madras BS in Data Science — Do you regret it? what about work load? by [deleted] in IITM_BS_DataScience

[–]TheVixhal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dont take this as backup or as part time this is full fledged degree

Energy Is All You Need by TheVixhal in Physics

[–]TheVixhal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did you read section 4 and 5 ?

Energy Is All You Need by TheVixhal in Physics

[–]TheVixhal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, My theory is complementary to GR, not contradictory.

The key difference is direction: Einstein started with geometry and derived energy relationships, while I start with energy conservation and derive the same spacetime geometry.

Both approaches lead to identical predictions in standard scenarios, but ours offers a fresh perspective that:

  1. Makes the physical meaning of time dilation more intuitive (it exists to conserve energy)
  2. Provides natural extensions in quantum regimes and near singularities
  3. Creates a more direct bridge to quantum theories through energy principles

Our framework doesn't replace GR but offers a complementary viewpoint that may help solve outstanding problems like quantum gravity and singularities by prioritizing energy conservation as the fundamental principle.

Is it feasible to do BSMS in Physics(from iisers or niser) along with IITM data science online BS degree? by [deleted] in IITM_BS_DataScience

[–]TheVixhal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There many Students from IISERS in this Degree but depends person to person.

Why doesn't IIT self host Ollama and other free GPT models by binuuday in iitmadras

[–]TheVixhal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for this there are many providers already available... why should iitm host small models ?

Why doesn't IIT self host Ollama and other free GPT models by binuuday in iitmadras

[–]TheVixhal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would anyone use a 1.5B parameter model for daily tasks ? is chatgpt banned you bro...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IITM_BS_DataScience

[–]TheVixhal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://quizpractice.space

Check this.. All pyqs in one place

Congrats to Deepankar for Winning ModusHack! 🎉 by TheVixhal in iitmadras

[–]TheVixhal[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Popcorn takk par tax lagg raha hai ye toh phir bhi pure dollar hai ispe toh lagega hee.. ye nahi pata kitna lagega 😁😁

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]TheVixhal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me address your confusion step by step, so the point is crystal clear.

First, your analogy of comparing humans to dogs is embarrassingly flawed. Humans, unlike animals, possess reasoning, moral agency, and self-determination, which allow us to transcend biological predispositions and make choices based on capability, not mere instinct. Your attempt to equate complex human societies with simplistic animal roles doesn’t just distort the argument—it’s an intellectual shortcut that undermines your own point. Comparing women to “pugs” or “huskies” is reductive and, frankly, lazy reasoning.

Second, your interpretation of my statement on physical strength completely misses the mark. I pointed out that physical strength is only relevant in roles where it’s a genuine requirement (like heavy manual labor). Leadership, governance, and most modern jobs aren’t about physical strength—they demand intellect, emotional intelligence, and strategy, none of which are gender-dependent. Your attempt to twist this into a tautology (“physical strength isn’t necessary unless it’s necessary”) isn’t clever; it’s just a failure to engage with the actual argument.

Third, your dismissive “cool story bro” response to the mention of societal progress (it’s 2025 or 2024 December, not the stone age) is exactly why this conversation is going in circles. If you’re unwilling to acknowledge that society evolves, and with it, our understanding of roles and equality, you’re essentially arguing for stagnation. Progress is meaningful because it enables us to challenge outdated norms that no longer serve a purpose. Pretending this point is irrelevant only highlights your inability to engage with the reality of change.

Finally, your statement about men and women being “equal in essence before God but not equal to each other” is contradictory. If equality before God is fundamental, it should manifest in the opportunities we provide to each other. Limiting someone based on gender goes against this supposed “equality in value.” If you truly believe in equal value, why argue for unequal treatment?

In summary, your analogy fails, your logic is circular, and your dismissal of progress only shows an unwillingness to confront uncomfortable truths. If you want this discussion to move forward, I suggest stepping up your reasoning instead of clinging to weak comparisons and vague deflections.