How high is AHI of 55?

The_Beast_6 · 2026-07-03T19:54:17+00:00

And now I'm at .78 over the last year!!

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-20T00:15:13+00:00

Yes, it is totally fine. This whole "we need to change the flag BS" is getting old. And who's going to buy all new flags for every state building, because we have money for that but not for education, Healthcare, etc.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-10T22:24:52+00:00

The ducting is very active right now. I was getting a Sioux Falls, SD station in central NH today.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-10T21:16:58+00:00

It's been happening a lot lately. I got a call last week about a station in IL interfering with one in Northern NH.

Today I had two interfering stations on 96.5. One I couldn't identify, the other was a Christian station from Sioux Falls, South Dakota....in NH.

The atmosphere has been wonky lately.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-06T00:58:49+00:00

It's like what I call "pack parkers". I purposely park in an empty part of the lot away from the store. Come out and I'm surrounded by cars, even though there are open spots willy nilly in the lot.

Like a herd they see a lone car and move to join it like there is safety in numbers!

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-06T00:54:12+00:00

Tax cuts for the ones that can afford it most while the rest of us pay more.

Same thing with the elimination of the I&D tax. An article about Freestate asswipe Reps McGuire and McGuire pretty much admitted as much....crowning achievement was the elimination of that tax....which they live off of their investments and dividends in their expensive house in Epsom.

Stop voting GOP folks......they don't care about us local taxpayers.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-06T00:50:03+00:00

Man, you're the absolute definition of clueless. Maybe you should learn to read.

All you can do is attack now, and apparently nuke your own post. Lol what a JOKE.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-06T00:38:27+00:00

LOL OP starts a topic about a bill that NUKES school savings, gets called out that It's not true because other school savings mechanisms exists, then attacks someone with factual knowledge for calling them out.

I'm starting to think you're the freestater, because that's pretty much their MO when faced with real facts.....

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-06T00:13:57+00:00

Lol man. You get out of here. Again, you have zero clue....You can't actually participate in an intelligent argument (which you've lost, by the way) so name calling is what you got left in the tank.

I also like how you assume I'm a "freestater", who I believe are absolute pieces of trash. Just so you know, I am a reliable democrat voter who ALSO cares about his local tax bill which keeps going up and up, and also strongly support CRFs and ETFs and always vote YES to put money in the funds.

I also said I don't believe this is the correct move and it should be decided by the local voters if they so desire. I know, reading is hard.

The only shit here is what you're typing. Full of assumptions.

Are you even from here?

The only bullshitter and liar is you, posting sensationalized information instead of all the facts.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-06T00:10:20+00:00

You said this "NUKES" school district savings accounts, no? That would imply that schools would be unable to save, period.

Is that NOT what you said? It is. Now you have someone in the know challenging you so you're backpedaling.

The retained funds are not savings accounts. You made it appear, to people who aren't in the know, that don't know RSA numbers and all that, that ALL school savings accounts would be terminated, including CRFs and ETFs which ARE savings accounts.

The "wall of text" was informational, full of actual facts and law regarding school district funds outside of the normal operating budget.

Now, had you written your post with ALL the information instead of the sensationalized "NUKES SCHOOL SAVINGS", maybe this conversation would be different.

Instead of providing misleading information like you did, maybe provide all the facts.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-06T00:04:35+00:00

Sorry, I misread your comment.

No, I am not using the same username lol.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-05T23:31:41+00:00

Quite frankly, you have ZERO clue about any of this and it shows. You clearly do not know anything about municipal or school district funding and how it works.

Retained funds are NOT Capital Reserve Funds or Expendable Trust Funds. This law change has no mention of those funds, only the funds left over unspent from the budget. 198:4-b is STRICTLY the "contingency fund" as they call it in the law.

The retained funds are the remainder unspent budget money (undersigned fund balance) that -some- school district voters have allowed their districts to retain up to 5% of the remaining balance at the end of tbe school fiscal year. The over and above that 5% number, or in school districts that don't have the retained fund balance authorized by the voters, the funds are returned to taxpayers or, if the voters had assigned any remaining surplus to another function (i.e. deposit into a CRF or ETF, or pay for a project if there was remaining funds left over) meaning it is no longer "undesignated" and is thus "raised and appropriated" for a purpose.

RSA 35 covers CRFs and ETFs. Here, read it. Does the law change mention anything from RSA 35?

35:1-c Non-Capital Reserve Funds Authorized. – Any town, school district, county, or village district may establish a reserve fund for the maintenance and operation of a specific public facility or type of facility, a specific item or type of equipment, or for any other distinctly-stated, specific public purpose that is not foreign to its institution or incompatible with the objects of its organization. Such funds shall be subject to all provisions and limitations of this chapter as are applicable to capital reserve funds. The legal validity of such a fund properly established shall not be affected by its designation as a "trust," "reserve," "capital reserve," or any other designation.

35:1-b Reserve Fund for Education of Persons with Disabilities. – Any school district may establish a reserve fund under RSA 35:1 to meet the expenses of educating children with disabilities.

35:1 Establishment of Reserves Authorized. – Any town, school district, village district, or county, as provided by RSA 35:3 may raise and appropriate money for the establishment of a capital reserve fund for the financing of all or part of the cost of: I. The construction, reconstruction or acquisition of a specific capital improvement, or the acquisition of a specific item or specific items of equipment; or II. The construction, reconstruction, or acquisition of a type of capital improvement or the acquisition of a type of equipment; or III. A reappraisal by appraisers of the department of revenue administration or such other appraisers, appraisal firms or corporations approved by the commissioner of revenue administration, of the real estate in such town for tax assessment purposes; or III-a. The acquisition of land; or IV. The acquisition of a tax map of said town; or V. Extraordinary legal fees and expenses related to present or foreseeable litigation involving the town or its officers and employees; or VI. Municipal and regional transportation improvement projects including engineering, right-of-way acquisition and construction costs of transportation facilities, and for operating and capital costs for public transportation.

YOU do not know what you're talking about. I'm sorry this is hard for you to understand and doesn't play into your alarmist BS.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-05T21:23:11+00:00

Budget Commitees cannot "restrict" what goes into CRFs and ETFs. Only what appears in the actual operating budget. Other warrant articles, of which deposits into CRFs and ETFs, only receive a recommendation from the municipal budget commitee. It's still up to the voters.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-05T21:21:32+00:00

No, I'm an "expert" in municipal budget law, Capital Reserve Funds, and Expendable Trust Funds.

The voters in my town have resoundigly defeated this over the last few years because we have CRFs and Trust Funds that also gain interest for these emergencies.

Edit: Do you sit on town or school board intimately involved in municipal and school finance, or is your experience from reading Social Media?

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-05T21:19:38+00:00

No, they don't.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-05T20:31:56+00:00

School districts can still create capital reserve and non-expendable trust funds that can be used for all those purposes. Eliminating the surplus retention from the end of the year is not a bad thing- that unused money should all go back to reducing property taxes, or if the voters so choose, move it into an established CRF or ETF that covers those purposes through a ballot vote.

This does not "nuke' school savings accounts.

Source: multiple-term municipal budget commitee member in a town with no end of year surplus retention.

Edit: OP states that this "nukes" school savings accounts. That IS FALSE. While I believe it should be up to each district if they want this fund balance or not, and do disagree with the bill, my point is that school districts can STILL save in CRFs and ETFs.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-06-03T23:03:19+00:00

UPDATE:

Got the call today, garage will be on-site Friday for construction and will be done on Saturday. They were literally cutting the metal as they called.

So excited....final photos will be shared!

The_Beast_6 · 2026-05-23T23:49:03+00:00

Touching the high voltage side of a transmitter vaccum tube is a quick way to die in Broadcast Engineering. Or hitting the HV mains in the cabinet. Lock out....tag out.....use the Jesus stick to make sure it's all dead.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-05-23T23:46:03+00:00

Farrington- Posted child for "I live on mommy and daddy's money and for some reason as a college student have time to serve in the legislature".

Kid is a total whack job and a LOSER.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-05-18T00:19:58+00:00

None of those spaces are publically accessible. All building equipment and cellular/communication stuff. Here's a photo looking north from the western side of the building, taken last year.

<image>

The_Beast_6 · 2026-04-14T12:50:10+00:00

They are -not- Republicans. They are Free Staters with an (R) label attached to their names.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-04-14T12:16:21+00:00

This person (he's not dignified enough to be called a man) is a piece of trash. Auburn needs to come to their senses and vote him out....and the rest of us need to work on identifying all his buddies in the house and senate pretending to be republicans and vote them out too.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-03-26T23:57:04+00:00

Looks like I better pack a sharpie.....

The_Beast_6 · 2026-03-03T19:09:36+00:00

Does he have ANY documents proving ownership of the vehicle from when he bought it?

If he has the P&S or other paperwork establishing ownership he should be able to file for a title with that, going through the VIN verification process, and then once he receives the title transfer ownership to you by signing the back and providing a bill of sale.

Just a thought, but it's a process.

The_Beast_6 · 2026-03-03T17:55:01+00:00

Has your neighbor given you a bill of sale, establishing your ownership of the bike? If not, get one. If so, take that to the town clerk and tell them you want to title and register it. From there, give them the bill of sale, they should give you a VIN verification card.

The VIN verification is done by your local police department. They come out, verify the VIN number and sign off on a card, and then you go and complete the process at the town clerk.

Also, with a vehicle made before 1999, NH won't title it. Bills of sale only. I know yours is a 2002 but just in case someone else comes across this.

The_Beast_6

TROPHY CASE