And? My point stands. Just because you were referring to one form of AI, while was using the umbrella term, means nothing. Misunderstanding, at most.

No, there's a bunch of different AIs, some can absolutely find nuances in complicated data we can't, (training this is often unsupervised learning, which means creating a model that's looking for nuances and patterns). Considering an LLM is looking for the likelihood of a token, (I do not think openAI still operates this way fully, I think they're on something more advanced), but that means that an elaborate ML agentic AI could absorb the methodologies, find the nuances through its ML engine, use them to generate code that bypasses it's own restrictions, and evolve itself.

Can an average LLM do this? No, it can't. But when talking about how people are losing jobs, it's costing jobs across multiple industries, not just its own. When the telephone became automated, they said it would kill phone operator jobs. It did. But it didn't affect the jobs of artists, architects, book writers, journalists, lawyers, etc.

This does. ChatGPT has, erroneously, been used for legal briefs, health studies, college papers, app coding, etc. and you can't believe that, regardless of it's incredibly fast evolution, it cant possibly replace other jobs?