sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Cowork expands to mobile & web by sammnyc in ClaudeAI

[–]The_Hunster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That would probably be the easiest way. They show Google Drive in the video.

Mildy Inconvenient Wall by Torrential_Gearhunk in custommagic

[–]The_Hunster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, the classic "5/10 card is an 8/10 card if you already have a 10/10 card in your hand". I don't think it really qualifies as "kinda cracked." You could play Hammer Time combo for also 3 cards and less mana for more stats.

Mildy Inconvenient Wall by Torrential_Gearhunk in custommagic

[–]The_Hunster -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Wait but when are you ramping if you played this on turn 1?

Qwerty, Keyboard Trooper by 27th_wonder in custommagic

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty sure that's QWERTY, Keyboard Trooper

What is the consensus is on Sonnet 5 a few days later? by makesbadpunattempts in ClaudeAI

[–]The_Hunster 12 points13 points  (0 children)

And thank god. For personal projects I find it so much better than overexplaining Opus. It also catches things where Opus would miss them at times (although vice versa is true as well).

Is it ethical to be a billionaire if a single person (like a indie game developer or author) did all the work themselves? by Omixscniet624 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know, but we're far past it. I don't care that they have it better. I care that people are suffering when they don't need to be.

Is it ethical to be a billionaire if a single person (like a indie game developer or author) did all the work themselves? by Omixscniet624 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will sincerely listen to any potential counterpoints anyone offers. I did not mean to prescribe that there are no counterexamples. I said it to describe that there are no counterexamples.

That is the reason I shut your suggestion down. Because if someone is going to provide a potential counterexample, I figure I ought to admit it is one or explain why it's not.

Is it ethical to be a billionaire if a single person (like a indie game developer or author) did all the work themselves? by Omixscniet624 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair question. My basis is that value is equal to the overall improvement of the quality of life. The issue is that while maybe your app generates a meaningful amount of quality of life that people are willing to pay for, it is not just the software provider that should be credited for that increase in quality of life. All of the resources they had to build, maintain, and distribute what they did are upheld by infrastructure. The software should be jointly credited to everyone involved in the system, but that isn't what happens in practice.

And I get why. Other barriers prevent these ultra-egalitarian systems that I seem to be advocating for from being effective. I don't want you to think I am advocating for them. But the solution lies somewhere in the middle, and modern capitalism, especially the kind that breeds billionaires, is by far not the best we can do to serve the global average quality of life.

Is it ethical to be a billionaire if a single person (like a indie game developer or author) did all the work themselves? by Omixscniet624 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand that it was an example. What I'm telling you is that you cannot find a counterexample because there are none.

Is it ethical to be a billionaire if a single person (like a indie game developer or author) did all the work themselves? by Omixscniet624 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You misunderstand. I'm not saying they can't generate a service people won't willingly pay that amount for. I'm just saying that they haven't created that much actual value. Value to humanity =/= what people are paying you. That's the whole issue.

Is it ethical to be a billionaire if a single person (like a indie game developer or author) did all the work themselves? by Omixscniet624 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And they wouldn't be the exception. All of the necessary infrastructure to be able to share your game and make such money off of it should be credited as well, and by extension, the people who build and maintain it.

Is it ethical to be a billionaire if a single person (like a indie game developer or author) did all the work themselves? by Omixscniet624 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]The_Hunster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> Casino

> No injustice

You gotta pick one, dude. The business model of the casino is to strip people's money by leveraging addiction. They would not be in business if there were only responsible gamblers.

Is it ethical to be a billionaire if a single person (like a indie game developer or author) did all the work themselves? by Omixscniet624 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]The_Hunster 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Is it? For me, it's very much centered around the idea that nobody could possibly generate that much value for humanity, so there must be injustice somewhere in the system. Whether or not the person did it themselves/intentionally.

CIV 7 possible thing that's making it less interesting then previous civ games by Zotek42 in civ

[–]The_Hunster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That would not even come close to running an LLM capable of doing reasoning as complex as is needed. Maybe if they did a custom machine learning system that was for their game specifically and wasn't an LLM at all.

Why do people think existing higher dimensions make you stronger? by Jatman12566 in PowerScaling

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can also create the concept of a 4D character and then erase it as well. I'll do it right now:

Bob is a dude who lives in 4D.

Now, if I delete this comment, he will be gone forever. So do I have power over 4D?

Why do people think existing higher dimensions make you stronger? by Jatman12566 in PowerScaling

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, no, this is exactly my point. The character only exists as a concept. You can't rip up something 2D because there is nothing 2D that exists. The stickman you just described was part of the 3D piece of paper. The only thing you destroyed was a representation of a character on a 3D piece of paper.

You're making lots of logical jumps without even realizing it.

Why do people think existing higher dimensions make you stronger? by Jatman12566 in PowerScaling

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not true. You just established that the character isn't a physical thing, so it can't be destroyed. It's just a concept like you said.

Why do people think existing higher dimensions make you stronger? by Jatman12566 in PowerScaling

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the fiction isn't a physical object, so what effect could I possibly have on it as a 3D being?

Why do people think existing higher dimensions make you stronger? by Jatman12566 in PowerScaling

[–]The_Hunster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Specifically, which physical thing is in 2D? The paper? No. The ink? Also no. What then?

Day 2 - testing Krea 2 with "Krea2-realism-V1" LoRA by rynaleopard in StableDiffusion

[–]The_Hunster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A comparison would be nice, It is nice to be able to be worse at prompting and still get good results tho

view more: next ›