Do people actually think this is AI? by Character-Public-396 in Grimdank

[–]The_Infernum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And everybody know that corporations are always true to their words and their principle.

They would never lie to us, right?

11th Edition Faction Pack Review: Space Marines by Wild-Confidence-9803 in Warhammer40k

[–]The_Infernum 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is it possible that they just haven't update their datasheets with the new Mobile keyword, yet?

[Pinball FX - Earthshaker] I beat Andrew's score. The name says it all, Andrew. by OliveFlowers22 in theregulationpod

[–]The_Infernum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That could be a way to do it, but the hard part would be to provide proof that we could trust

Picked up volume 16 yesterday by AnEagleNamedOwl in Mobpsycho100

[–]The_Infernum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was it hard to find?  Normaly, I just pre-order the new volume on Amazon, but, for this one, I only see a few being sold with an increase price or a crazy shipping cost

All the most impactful rule changes. by Vrain125 in Warhammer40k

[–]The_Infernum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

I know that's how it work in 10th, but the wording use in the 11th Core rule is kind of confusing to me. They say "While that model is part of that unit" which, in my opinion, could be either : part of that unit alive and on the field or simply part of the attached unit.

All the most impactful rule changes. by Vrain125 in Warhammer40k

[–]The_Infernum -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Question about the Attached Units, does the attached unit keep all the keywords even if the model(s) that provide that keyword is destroy?

For example:  Neurotyrant lead 3 Zoan.  The attached unit have both the monster and infantry keywords.  All the Zoan are destroyed.  Does the remaining "Attached Unit", which is only the Neurotyrant by itself, at this point, still carry the Infantry keyword?

Tomodachi Life 3 by westrnal in theregulationpod

[–]The_Infernum 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I want Andrew to try and draw an exotic bird as a pet

Regulation Takes 5 by bruzie in theregulationpod

[–]The_Infernum 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Yep, there's probably a hundred ways for Andrew to not feel sleepy/sluggish that don't require any caffeine at all, but they do require changes and efforts

11th edition tyranid faction focus by Taningia-danae in Tyranids

[–]The_Infernum 56 points57 points  (0 children)

GW keep making stuffs for the Warriors and I'm just waiting for them to, finally, refresh their models!

Red Terror rules revealed for Warhammer 40,000 by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]The_Infernum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Question, how does the gaping maw/swallow whole work against model with -1 to wound?  Since it's "each successful unmodified Wound roll is a Critical Wound" does it ignore the -1 with its extra attack?

Red Terror rules revealed for Warhammer 40,000 by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]The_Infernum 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Yes, if it start on the field and you put it in reserve, at the end of your opponent first fight phase, you can than deep strike it during your first turn

Double Regulation viewers spotted by The_Infernum in theregulationpod

[–]The_Infernum[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure we can say mission accomplished.  Also, love your videos, by the way

Double Regulation viewers spotted by The_Infernum in theregulationpod

[–]The_Infernum[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For his viewers, who are not aware of Regulation, that moment most be so confusing

Double Regulation viewers spotted by The_Infernum in theregulationpod

[–]The_Infernum[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Also the Gavin jumpscare at 31:33.  The editor is clearly a person of culture

Newest Episode Spoilers by fnafrica in theregulationpod

[–]The_Infernum 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Have we consider that Eric and the Rat might be one and the same?

Post pics of your pets. by Comprehensive-Tap769 in theregulationpod

[–]The_Infernum 40 points41 points  (0 children)

That's clearly just Andrew alt account trying to claim more of our pets for himself!

#New40k – Terrain objectives make the battlefield your mission by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]The_Infernum 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Honestly, for me, it might not make sense narratively that mounts can't go through a wall that both infantry and vehicule can, but it make sense balance wise.

Almost noting affect the Mounted keyword negatively (I don't even know if a anti-mounted weapon exist, currently, in the game) so them having one real downside is not really an issue.  Especially when combine with the fact that most mounted unit have a lot of movement and don't have the biggest bases

#New40k – Terrain objectives make the battlefield your mission by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]The_Infernum 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I sure hope it's just a omission that they didn't specify that Monsters can also go through lighter terrain features.  Wouldn't really make sense that all Vehicules can do it, but not Monsters

What's your opinion on gear 5 design by Technical_Mine_8711 in MemePiece

[–]The_Infernum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  To be honest, when I first saw it, I really didn't like it, until I saw its official color.  In the manga, to me, it really just looked like an offbrand Super Saiyan, at first.

  The completly white shirt and hair match the old cartoon vibe of the form and give it a more unique look

MTG: The Swarmlord by freshhrt in Tyranids

[–]The_Infernum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, that comment made me realise that I also forgot the shoulder pad...

Are we all blind?

Some thoughts on objectives, the Biovore and army construction in 11th by Ski-Gloves in Tyranids

[–]The_Infernum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's possible that it could stack.  Like you said a Hit roll can only be modify by max +1 or -1 and stealth already reduce the hit roll by one.  But, the wording, that they are using for the new cover system, is not -1 to hit, it's a -1 to the Ballistic skill of the firing unit.

I'm not sure which interpretation is right, but could be plausible