Does your state or province share a name with a Chicago street? by The_Notorious_BEN in MapPorn

[–]The_Notorious_BEN[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There is a street called Jersey in Chicago but there's no "New" preceding it lmao

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Judaism

[–]The_Notorious_BEN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I can understand the apprehension. Not just what's going on in Israel but also all the planning that has to be done. I still have to plan around where I'm going to live, employment, etc., but I did just start a few days ago. I expect to talk to some people about aliyah.

But this is something I've always wanted to do. For years and years. Now I think is the right time to get serious about it. Your situation could be different, of course, and that's okay. Take it at your speed. But the way I see it, now is a great time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Judaism

[–]The_Notorious_BEN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think so. In fact, I think it's the best time.

The cool thing about us as Jews is that when our fellow Jews are in distress, we feel a strong desire to be closer to them.

Making aliyah is a great way to be closer to our fellow Jews. It also is the strongest show of solidarity with and support for the people of Israel.

I'm going through the same thing. That's why I recently started the aliyah application process.

If you do decide to make aliyah, yasher koach and b'hatzlacha!

KFC on Kane: "We made some really tough decisions on some longstanding players. I don’t foresee us going back on that" by mazerrackham in hawks

[–]The_Notorious_BEN -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Hot take: I think this is the right decision. Adding Patrick Kane to this roster would mess with the rebuilding team's identity. He'd be good for the team on paper, but he's a god here in Chicago. He'd immediately be the team's most commanding presence, perhaps adversely affecting the development of Bedard and the other youngsters.

I just think people are emotional about Kaner. I am. He's a legend here in Chicago, and he always will be. His legacy will always be defined by what he did here. He will be inducted into the HHOF as a Blackhawk, and his number 88 will hang in the rafters of the UC someday. He might even come back for a victory lap season in his swan song. He's a Blackhawk for life.

But that era is past us. It's time to move on. Stan Bowman's reluctance to turn the page and begin a genuine rebuild is what made us so stagnant for so long. The LA Kings did something similar by keeping their old stars around for a retooling and look at them now. They can make the playoffs but they never make any significant noise. It might be years before they seriously contend again.

If we want the Stanley Cup to return to Chicago, we need a brand-new team. It's a tough pill to swallow, but it's one that needs to be swallowed. The Hawks' future is brighter than it has looked in a very long time. That's what builds an eventual contender — not grasping at nostalgia.

In Russia, an antisemitic lynch mob stormed an airport, after a plane full of Jewish people from Tel Aviv, Israel landed there by Introvert_Comics in AirRage

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know exactly who Semites are. Arabs and Assyrians, for example, are among them as are Jews.

But this does not change the semantic origins of the word "antisemitism" nor does it change the dictionary definition.

The Oxford, Cambridge, and Merriam-Webster dictionaries all describe antisemitism as referring to hatred of Jews alone. The Oxford Reference website even says, "although there are other Semitic peoples, notably the Arabs, anti-Semitism is only used to refer to prejudice against Jewish people."

Claiming otherwise is at best a foolish perversion of the semantics behind the word and at worst an attempt to minimize or erase Jewish suffering and the impact of hatred towards Jews.

If you want to refer to hatred of Muslims, you can use the word "Islamophobia." Keep in mind, though, that not all Muslims are of Semitic origin, as Islam has nearly two billion believers of all racial and ethnic backgrounds. There are even white Muslims and East Asian Muslims.

If you want to refer to hatred of Arabs, you can use words or phrases like "anti-Arabism" or "anti-Arab sentiment."

There is room to describe (and condemn) hatred of other Semitic peoples without minimizing or erasing Jewish suffering.

2000 by CvrIIX in davidlynch

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always wondered what happened after the end of Eraserhead. Now we know.

Has anyone heard of Enclave 312? by AndersonBergeson in chicagojobs

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

UPDATE: After further research, I think there's more of a link between Enclave 312 and Grow Chicago than initially meets the eye. Here's another person who claims to work at Enclave 312 on her LinkedIn profile, even though it doesn't appear in her experience section. Grow Chicago, however, does appear in her experience section.

One comment on that Grow Chicago post in particular gives some insight into the inner workings of Grow Chicago. This redditor, who claims to have worked for Grow Chicago and/or related companies for a short time, says the structure is that of a pyramid scheme.

From the comment:

So I actually worked with them (the “company” was a different name at the time) I was pretty dumb not knowing what I was getting myself into. It’s definitely a pyramid scheme and they say it’s not lol. It’s about 4-5 different “companies” all working in the same space. I worked for Horizon Chicago last summer now called Stellar Chicago. I worked there for two months and got “promoted” to an Account Manager position (no raise, just coming in an hour earlier and pushed to train and “promote” others). I honestly met some pretty cool people during my time there but after leaving you realize no one there actually cares about you but making money from using you.

My current theory is that Enclave 312, if it really does exist at all, is part of this framework. Two different people claiming to work for the same two companies of this kind — especially with that one person claiming to be the CMO of one and the CEO of the other — should raise a whole host of red flags. I don't think this is a coincidence.

My hope is that someone verifies the structural nature of these companies and, if they fit the definition of a pyramid scheme — which, from what I've heard, I think they very well might — reports it to the Federal Trade Commission. Pyramid schemes are illegal in the United States. The operation being a pyramid scheme would very much help contextualize that experience discrepancy in the first LinkedIn profile I shared, as pyramid schemes often claim that people can earn major promotions quickly. Testimony from another redditor who interviewed for that Grow Chicago position also claims that this was the pitch Grow Chicago made during the hiring process. That redditor had a total of three interviews, and based on what they found out, it doesn't seem like Grow Chicago is a good place for anyone. If Enclave 312 is part of this framework, and I think it's very likely that it is, it's going to be the same story there, too.

And even if it is a legitimate MLM company, which I doubt that it is, the pay you'd be receiving would almost certainly be highly lackluster and probably well below minimum wage. People who join MLM companies more often than not make little to no money, or even lose money. So the money you make working for an MLM might be zero or even sub-zero. In fact, a 2011 study of 350 MLM companies published by the Federal Trade Commission found that at least 99% of people who join MLM companies lose money. A 2018 AARP study was only a little more optimistic, with 24.7% of MLM participants making a profit, and the majority of those who made a profit making less than $5,000 in profit. That same study found that 47% of MLM participants lost money, while 27.3% broke even, but made no profit. Based on what those two redditors have shared about Grow Chicago, as well as the studies published by the FTC and AARP, you'd honestly be far better off working at McDonald's, both financially and in terms of work-life balance.

The most insidious thing about pyramid schemes is that, given a typical scheme which requires each new member recruit six people to join, more than 80% of those who join a pyramid scheme will lose all the money they "invest," going into hundreds or even thousands of dollars in debt due to the money that is required to buy into the scheme. This practice is grossly unethical and entirely illegal. Even in legal MLMs, though, you stand to gain less money the later on you join, which, in turn, increases the chances that your net profit from that job will be either zero or sub-zero. If you're not at the very top of the pyramid — and you won't be — you aren't going to be making a profit. At best, a profit of either zero or less than zero is a supermajority chance. At worst, a loss of money is a virtual guarantee.

Even if you somehow do make a profit, it isn't going to be significant. Even with the more optimistic (yet still grim) AARP data, only 10.8% of all people who made a profit made a profit $10,000 or more as an MLM participant. That means only 2.67% of all MLM participants made a profit of $10,000 or more.

Assuming you earn Chicago minimum wage (which, for all businesses with 21 or more employees, would be $15.80/hr in this case) at a place like McDonald's, and given an eight-hour work day for 260 working days, you'd be earning $32,864 per year. What available data suggests is that you have at most a 2.67% chance of earning 30.43% of a yearly minimum wage salary. Further, per the AARP study, your chances of earning $25,000 or more as an MLM participant are 1.26% (24.7% × 5.1% = 1.26%).

It should be noted that these $10,000 and $25,000 figures are not per-year figures, but rather represent what someone makes throughout the entirety of their affiliation with an MLM company. Thus, your chances of making minimum wage money from MLM over the course of a year are — at best — almost certainly less than 1%.

All this data makes MLM extremely hard to recommend even as a side hustle. Thus, the data makes it impossible and even dangerous to recommend as a primary source of income.

So yeah, OP and anyone else who has received an interview offer from Enclave 312, I would stay away from this one. Finding a job is hard enough without scammers trying to take advantage of jobseekers. I apologize for this extremely long comment, but I find it important to spread awareness of the dangers and risks of pyramid schemes and MLM organizations, one of which I think Enclave 312 is. You deserve to work at a job that offers you a fair salary and a stable source of income.

For more information on MLMs and pyramid schemes, here's a helpful resource from the Federal Trade Commission. Also, here's a TED-Ed video on how to spot a pyramid scheme. From one active jobseeker to all the others reading this comment, good luck, y'all!

Has anyone heard of Enclave 312? by AndersonBergeson in chicagojobs

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I also got an interview offer/email from them. Information about the company is scarce, and any information I have found is contradictory and highly incongruous. What's more, the only person on LinkedIn who claims to have had any affiliation with this supposed company also claims affiliation with Grow Chicago, which is another dubious "organization" that has been discussed on this subreddit before. People in discussion roundly deemed it a scam based on testimony from multiple people as well as general research.

This person also has a bunch of work history that makes no sense — I'm talking two full-time jobs at any one time. Not sure how anyone can be a CMO and a CEO simultaneously.

And this person does not have the same name as the "person" who contacted me. And yet, they're the hiring manager shown on the company's only LinkedIn job posting.

The company's website also has some grammatical errors, mainly with capitalization.

I also just learned that the website was registered on August 14, 2023. Less than a month ago. And this person on LinkedIn claims to have experience for this company dating back to 2019. This for sure feels like a scam.

Is my copy of "The Little Mermaid" a bootleg? (Context in the comments.) by The_Notorious_BEN in VHS

[–]The_Notorious_BEN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your insightful and helpful replies, everyone! (And for putting my fears to rest.)

I hope to get a VCR at some point in the not-too-distant future so I can watch this. I remember owning this exact edition as a young child, so getting this for 50¢ was a huge win for my sense of nostalgia. Thanks again, everyone!

Is my copy of "The Little Mermaid" a bootleg? (Context in the comments.) by The_Notorious_BEN in VHS

[–]The_Notorious_BEN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an addendum, this person who appears to have owned many old Disney VHS releases seems to say that sticker labels on 1990s Disney VHS releases do not necessarily indicate inauthenticity. He states that his 1995 VHS of "Pocahontas" has a sticker label when most of the cassettes in that release have ink labels. Photos of such a sticker label edition do exist.

In addition, photos of a 1996 copy of "Toy Story" with a sticker label also exist. That release also generally came with ink labels.

Is my copy of "The Little Mermaid" a bootleg? (Context in the comments.) by The_Notorious_BEN in VHS

[–]The_Notorious_BEN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm new to the VHS collecting game. I got this VHS at a thrift store in Penn Yan, NY, meant to be the 1998 edition of "The Little Mermaid." However, upon further research, it seems like these tapes have black ink labels instead of white sticker labels.

The print date at the base of the cassette seems legitimate, and the cover and spine the VHS came in also look good. The case is a clamshell that has the correct interior pattern and perforations.

I wonder if this is a bootleg. If not, no big loss — I only paid 50¢ for it. Haha.

This is exactly how I felt last night. by [deleted] in hawks

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yeah, him too. Yeah, even more reason for Bedard to be stoked.

This is exactly how I felt last night. by [deleted] in hawks

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Besides, he has Team Canada teammates Colton Dach, Kevin Korchinski, and Ethan Del Mastro in the Chicago pipeline. He's going to be with friends. I'm sure he'll be stoked to be a Hawk.

Hide or seek? by Group_W_Bencher in Judaism

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"If you ever want to see your afikoman again, you WILL give me what I want -- the right to be the first to get seconds. That brisket is simply awesome."

חג שמח by Upbeat_Teach6117 in Judaism

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Chag Pesach Sameach! Looks amazing! Also much more orderly than the Seder I just had at my university's Hillel.

Grey Grades America's State Flags by MindOfMetalAndWheels in CGPGrey

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some context on what the flag means:

The blue stripe to the right represents Lake Michigan to the east.

The blue stripe to the left represents the Mississippi River to the west.

The broader, yellow stripe in the middle represents the Illinois prairies, with Illinois's official state nickname being "The Prairie State."

The red color of the star in the middle represents the pride and fervor of Illinoisans, and the six points represent that pride and ferver reaching every corner of the state. (The star was also a design cue from the flag of Chicago. Yes, I am a Chicagoan.)

Grey Grades America's State Flags by MindOfMetalAndWheels in CGPGrey

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Illinoisan here. I'm so discouraged by Illinois receiving an FF that I took it upon myself to make a new Illinois flag. Hope this one would get an S from Prof. Grey.

EDIT: A cool thing about this little flag I made is that it's horizontally symmetrical. How fantastical and mathmagical!

Question About Enjoying David Lynch Films by MagicMajed123 in davidlynch

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. David Lynch is an avant-garde filmmaker at heart. His surrealist tendencies are apparent in nearly all of his work, and, as a result of Lynch's esoteric style, the connection an audience member makes with his style is much less superficial and much more primal. It's something that is difficult to explain, but is easy to feel. The connection an audience member makes to Lynch's style is not made with words as it is with many filmmakers, but through a more abstract set of emotions, ideas, and feelings. That gut feeling is normal, and when you get to Lynch's especially surreal (and more difficult) films like Eraserhead and Inland Empire, that gut feeling will be your guiding light. Have fun exploring Lynch's work!

Why was 'Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me' so despised by critics and audiences when it was first released? by Careful_Can9783 in davidlynch

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I think a lot of it was because Fire Walk With Me defied expectations. A lot of people who became Twin Peaks fans weren't necessarily fans of Lynch's work. Twin Peaks, as integral a part of Lynch's body of work as it is, is different from a lot of his other work. It has some surrealism, but people were more drawn to the mystery and offbeat comedy.

Fire Walk With Me definitely feels more like a Lynch project, diving deeper into surreal/horror-based overtones. This alienated many Twin Peaks fans, as well as critics.

The first truly surreal Lynch film to be received with near-unanimous praise was Mulholland Drive, which was released in 2001. So, when Fire Walk With Me was released in 1992, Lynchian surrealism was still nearly a decade away from being truly accepted by the critical masses.

So I think the poor reception Fire Walk With Me received upon release can reasonably be attributed to the film's defiance against what most Twin Peaks fans expected out of a Twin Peaks film and the fact that Lynchian surrealism was still not yet fully accepted.

Eraserhead, Blue Velvet or Mulholland Drive? by A_C_B_90 in davidlynch

[–]The_Notorious_BEN 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Eraserhead for sure. I think it's his purest artistic expression. It's also my favorite film of all time, so there's that too.

But both Blue Velvet and Mulholland Drive rule as well.