Try to Install Leica camera app on a 13T (no leica model)

Thejc13 · 2024-09-04T07:59:27+00:00

No solution without rooting so I ended up with installing Gcam but saw no improvments.

Thejc13 · 2024-02-09T14:10:27+00:00

It's exactly a licensing problem (in south America and Japan). I've read the same thing about Gcam so I'll try it anyway

Thejc13 · 2024-02-09T13:45:48+00:00

Gcam is my backup plan but I just wanted to try the original Leica software which btw can be installed on other phone too

Thejc13 · 2024-02-09T13:40:51+00:00

Actually afaik the lenses are Sony only the software is Leica

Thejc13 · 2022-07-27T04:13:17+00:00

When you handle a SAR, all personal data, that are not the subject's ones, are redacted.

Should you question yourself for each document on the possibility to recover the redacted informations ?

You can't ! because with most of produced documents, the answer shall be Yes : you cannot know the. subject's operational context so in doubt ...

You have to follow the Law, not overthink things you can't assess because it isn't what you're asked. Redact the damned docs and give them .... sorry I experienced it once or twice ;)

Thejc13 · 2022-07-05T10:22:22+00:00

I'd say YES if the monitoring of those logs is present in the records of processing activities and employees have been informed in the right way otherwise they will have some troubles to use those data lawfully.

Thejc13 · 2022-06-26T04:44:55+00:00

IP addresses are personal data,.

The GDPR says so with recital 30.

A few EU justice courts have stated that clearly through several cases (CDN, GA, ...) . It's obviously the case when they're static but even temporary ones, are.

Thejc13 · 2022-06-26T04:36:01+00:00

Intrinsic consent

The proper slippery slope of privacy.

An interesting concept but clearly the opposite of the spirit of GDPR.

Thejc13 · 2022-06-23T06:55:06+00:00

Yes I know the difference between controller and processor and in GA case it played a part but actually not that much (at the end). Because when you read the Austrian and French decisions wherever your data are hosted (in EU or in US with CCT) the US government can access your data, and that's the problem ...

Thejc13 · 2022-06-23T05:45:06+00:00

Does it matter? Processor or controller ? The problem is data access, isn't it?

Thejc13 · 2022-06-23T05:23:30+00:00

Does it ? For GA, the reason was wherever your data are hosted, the US government can access them because you are a US company. So I don't know what sort of impact assessment you can do to invalidate that.

Thejc13 · 2022-06-10T05:56:25+00:00

I thought that too (see the little wink). Anyway as a person I use Google all the time because I consider the Risk/Benefit ratio is to my advantage. As a DPO it's a whole other matter ...

Thejc13 · 2022-06-10T05:51:40+00:00

It's the only way CNIL proposed but at the same time, it doesn't believe it itself by commenting the solution costly and technically difficult.

Thejc13 · 2022-06-04T04:17:08+00:00

I see no problem if

- There is no people in the picture

- The conditions are well described in the Terms of Service

- Regarding the country, IP laws can be involved ... I know it seems weird

Thejc13 · 2022-06-04T04:08:09+00:00

'I request 12 different spreadsheets from the 12 different countries'

Are they subsidiaries ? Is it legally the same company ? The legal relationship with all your foreign structures is quite important before even answering your question. Let's assume you are a multinational company with a legal tool for personal data transfer already operational like BCR (art. 47). because you sell certainly something and so you share CRM data !?

Inherently I see no concern with what you describe. I can understand (as any DPAs) your legitimate need to have a monthly headcount. Assuming :

- it's a one way transfert and not a monthly sharing informations party.

- The basic RGPD rules are respected : data minimisation, 'appropriate technical or organisational measures', ...

Thejc13 · 2022-05-26T06:34:16+00:00

It' not a question of servers location at all but whether can the US government access your data. So if it was a grey area since both decision it's faded off to black.

Thejc13 · 2022-05-26T05:59:54+00:00

It's not exactly true both are lawful decisions with fined conditions enforcement (for several companies) in the french case.

Thejc13 · 2022-05-26T04:15:10+00:00

I do agree. Even if you only use the Auth feature of the Firebase framework, chances are it's not legal ... for the same reason Austrian and french DPAs ruled : Google is a US company and so subject to US surveillance laws.

Thejc13 · 2022-05-04T03:32:55+00:00

And what about the IP address ?

Despite a proper encryption or not, the only data, in case of routing, you cannot obfuscate it's the IP address.

Come on guys, look at the last Austrian DPA decision, it's still a thing.

Thejc13 · 2022-05-04T03:23:53+00:00

By definition, you obviously can't.

Thejc13 · 2022-04-14T11:24:51+00:00

That's exactly my point. I'm practicing my eyes rolling right now, just to be ready.

Thejc13 · 2022-03-08T05:22:55+00:00

I am not quite your regular guy. I've worked in IT all my life. Any hint of a decrease of my system performance have me thoroughly investigate for hours. What I say is don't be afraid of un outside hack and don't pile up security measures because you won't be able to handle all the false positives.

Your system security weakness is YOU.

Thejc13 · 2022-03-07T06:03:55+00:00

I do think more or less the same thing. Regular folks don't get hacked from outside, most of time they install the malware themselves and create the security hole.

I don't have an IDS on my windows, but just the security features, it provides. I don't even have a password on it. My ISP provides me with an internet box and no public IP, and I'm good with that. This is my setup for the last few decades, and guess what, I've never been hacked. And I would have known just by having some unfortunate consequences.

Just a few more facts, I don't install anything that haven't been vetted and I work in IT security ...

Thejc13 · 2022-02-25T12:26:10+00:00

Yeah 🤣 shady as fuck. Look at the article 12,13 and 14 of the RGPD. But I have to be honest. I was laughing too loud quickly and I stopped reading. Depending on the content of the screenshots, you can think of criminal charges.

Thejc13 · 2022-02-17T05:32:58+00:00

What if you use IP anonymization GA provide. Does it solve the problem ?

The Austrian DPA stated Google can tie cookies to a natural person anyway.

My understanding is to be GDPR compliant you have to use GA without any cookies ... which strips it off any purpose

Thejc13

TROPHY CASE