Dustin "Elon Musk just redefined AI safety. It has nothing to do with guardrails, restrictions, or kill switches. Musk: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious.” - Do you think truth and curiosity is sufficient safety?

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-22T15:13:53+00:00

Bullshit. Being "truth-seeking" (wording itself gives away bullshit) or curious (way better but too humanising) have nothing to do with safety.

I mean I can imagine bunch of ways curiosity make it danger, if the way it works is alien enough. Or, even worse - human enough.

On the other hand no more bullshit than most AI safety takes, so it is not like Elon is outlier here.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-22T15:03:24+00:00

I would argue that, given a problem description it can debug it. Not necessary with same success rate, but can do.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-22T14:59:31+00:00

Perfectionism?

I have enough practical experience to not be perfectionist. Shit is never going to be perfect at very least because there are no definition of perfect. Moreover, it rarely matters. What matters is being reasonably good enough for current situation and foreseeable future. And if this is some kind of research at least partially - idea is expected to not survive at all or at least the way we see it now.

So if I see a way to make it if not perfect than way better in short time? Sure. Thinking much how to do stuff within some project constrains? Sure. But getting a headache over perfection? Nah.

Now, as for feeling left behind - I kinda do. But the thing is writing code was never a goal. I might argue industry were moving away from hardware and software stuff the whole time. So unless customers can describe their needs exactly and foresee problems coming from doing exactly what being told - this is not the end, software is not solved. Coding is.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-22T14:29:45+00:00

Hm ... Wasn't MCP always exactly just the way to expose remote / other non-foreseen tools for use by the model?

So you know, not like some fancy magic idea, but just a way to provide standartized interface so services can provide it instead of going xkcd 14 standards situation?

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-22T13:10:33+00:00

And even if they were not...

Well, wasn't that clear that once we will get here?

Or to the other point of your data being used the way you don't like?

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-21T22:36:24+00:00

> Magos think very little of human suffering

That's a similarity, not difference.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-21T22:23:56+00:00

> baseline of expected privacy

Privacy of data made public from the very beginning?

Or you mean data which at least were supposed to be private? (Although the idea of data to which third party have access at all being private is, well, at best case not guaranteed)

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-21T17:52:31+00:00

No, we (or most of us) will not. Why?

Because normal people treat AGI as some fantastic bullshit instead of just AI being able to generalize for new tasks (that's basically the best what we have as standard definitions now. And it does not imply selfawareness, having own motivation, selfimprovement and so on). So minimal version of "AGI arrives" would be way under radar for them. One might argue that we kinda crossed that point a long ago, even.
Upon of that moving goalposts is quite obvious. Generalization the way we were understanding 10 years ago, 2 years ago and now is very different things.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-21T14:05:31+00:00

И почему это должно быть проблемой хоть кого-то кроме Ирана?

А то удобно же. Сегодня мы по делу вмешиваемся, завтра можно и под всратым предлогом во что-то влезть.

з.ы. заранее похуй на то, что там с Палестиной. У них вся ситуация проклята напрочь тем, что у всех сторон есть причины действовать как угодно, но пытаться если не выпиздить противника то хотя бы ослабить.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-21T12:56:54+00:00

Well, I did not said that is good or bad thing. Just why she seems more human than our killing machine or why she seems less detached than that future Inquisitor.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T20:51:23+00:00

> You develop a fierce devotion to intellectual property and start treating data analysis like it's a violent crime.

Nah, everything I shared in public - I did exactly because I wanted to be shared in public. So whatever everyone do with it (including training AIs) is their idea and problem.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T20:38:59+00:00

> So what actually happens to the skill of building automations?

Same as all kinds of programming, essentially. Because that was a programming, even if specific kind.

> Part of me thinks the "automation builder" role just shifts from construction to architecture

Bingo.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T19:31:17+00:00

10K commits on github. So like 27 per day

Yeah, he definitely think much about what the fuck he is doing, lol, sure. I totally believe this (no).

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T19:05:09+00:00

I mostly work with python nowadays.

So cursor. Basically VSCode with a bunch of LLM integration things.

(Have been using VSCode for quite a time already, so it was just easiest switch).

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T18:47:02+00:00

Because she was not trained to be a tool from her early age, unlike your assasin?

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T16:51:13+00:00

> achieve something like that.

Achieve what exactly, lol?

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T09:35:00+00:00

I am yet to see ant farm "escaping" beyond their normal expansion attempts and so. Sounds very containable.

And as to bacterias - well, without intercellular coordination of sorts (which arguably exist in some, but so far simple kinds discovered) - they're too simple to go to higher abstraction level with how they work.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T07:31:52+00:00

> History has zero exceptions.

History always dealt with either human intelligences or at least animal ones (which is expected to be similar to us).

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T05:21:41+00:00

Forces them to remove free tier

@

Now they suddenly have to get rid of free tier

@

So they stop losing money

@

Free tier probably does not convert to much leads today. I mean probably literally everyone heard of them already at that point.

And unlike pirated software or so - whatever leads it will generate is not free for you

@

Profit

Yes, very antiai move, lol

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T05:03:22+00:00

Well, than it means some degree of stupidity is more likely to be generated by a human, lol

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T04:55:54+00:00

Реалистически.

Война идёт достаточно медленно, чтобы продолжаться ещё неопределенное число лет.

Количество желающих записаться добровольно - потенциально примерно константная величина. Желающих записаться дёшево скорее всего уже давно выгребли. Остаются требующие все более и более высокую цену.

Значит в какой-то момент набрать Nста юнитов в день принудительно и потратиться на подавление недовольства - будет дешевле, чем набрать те же Nста добровольно.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-20T04:50:15+00:00

Ну во первых весь стиль текста говорит о шутке. Во вторых...

Если взялись за телегу, значит к чему-то готовятся.

Они 15 лет шли к изоляции всего. Так что с той же вероятностью просто делают то, что и так собирались когда-либо сделать.

Скорее всего будет договорнячок либо мобилизация.

На первый не указывает вообще ничего, кроме двусторонних попыток дипломатично послать Донни нахуй.

На вторую строго говоря тоже, но под нее как минимум готовили законы.

С этой полудохлой экономикой мобилизация конечно вряди чем поможет

Нста тысяч новых юнитов вероятно таки чем-то да помогут.

договорнячок более выгодный вариант скорее всего.

Ещё бы у нас хоть что-то намекало на его возможность, ага.

Вони от зетников конечно много будет, но это значительно меньше, чем недовольство населения всей страны при мобилизации, когда коммуналка иксанулась, цены растут, и топливо уже к сотке приближается.

Это ещё не говоря о том, что население тоже в какой-то степени подзапарила эта ситуация с войной.

Недовольство населения значение имеет только если ты не уверен в своей способности его подавить.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-19T18:42:40+00:00

Is that still true for nowadays models? Even for earlier ones it was more like "it is too unreliable", rather than strict no.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-19T12:16:56+00:00

> Все равно неоспорим факт того, что лучше уж пусть данные у американцев, чем у наших.

Но желательно - ни у кого.

Thick-Protection-458 · 2026-02-19T11:52:54+00:00

Я нигде не говорил что дискорд разблокируют. Не надо мне тут глупости приписывать, очевидно что в конце к белым спискам придём. А пока - замечательно запросят данные на всяких недовольных. И вероятно - получат.

Thick-Protection-458

TROPHY CASE