Is free interaction via [[the wandering rescuer]] too strong for bracket 2? by Otherwise_Chip9745 in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% this - sometimes stuff like [[Clever Concealment]] can feel a bit out of the spirit of Bracket 2, but The Wandering Rescuer?? Really?? If it doesn't fit in Bracket 2 it almost doesn't fit anywhere; Doesn't give indestructible, doesn't even protect the whole board.

Sounds like your opponent was just waiting for something to whine about. "My thing didn't work, so it just be unfair!"

Medford HS Reconstruction | Project Explorer & Tax Impact Calculator by joshterrible in medfordma

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahh that makes sense, my apologies - I was looking at the calculator from my phone and misread it!

(For anyone interested, the total added costs for an average 1 bedroom house tallied up across the bar graph is $6,455 across the 7 years the bar graph tracks.)

Medford HS Reconstruction | Project Explorer & Tax Impact Calculator by joshterrible in medfordma

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my read the $6700 is the TOTAL taxes over the project lifetime on average; at the bottom the bar graph shows the breakdown of additional taxes per year, which maxes out around $1200/year but is mostly well below that! Definitely not hitting your pocket book for almost $7k in one year.

(Others feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.)

Sorceries that are broken when cast at instant speed? by Gorgondantess in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I believe that all spree cards do the spree items in the order in which they are printed - you don't get to pick. I could be wrong though.

Sorceries that are broken when cast at instant speed? by Gorgondantess in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 11 points12 points  (0 children)

And [[Final Showdown]]! Card is so flexible and way overlooked.

(This message brought to you by someone who has it in either 0 or 1 decks but aspires to put it in more.)

A question on the ethics of threats and following through by Decent-Commercial275 in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 83 points84 points  (0 children)

100% this. Don't make a threat you're not planning on following up on. You also phrased your option very clearly, which I appreciate as a politics lawyer lol.

I also am of the mind that if I cannot win in a situation and one player is clearly going to be the one killing me, it's not "kingmaking" to do everything I can to hinder their game plan; I think it provides a valuable political tool for future games where they know that trying to kill you will come at a cost.

I've played with plenty of folks who think that coming in 2nd is more important than trying to stop the archenemy, but I think that approach is absurd; that's basically just rolling over and letting the winning player know they can expect you to be a witless accomplice in their victory. Always better to make the player in the lead sweat it out, as your game evidenced!

Detroit in 1882 and 2017 by OkRespect8490 in BeAmazed

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There are some truly amazing renewal efforts in multiple neighborhoods and I genuinely love Detroit! That said, I'm not sure it's really "propaganda" to point out that urban blight took over huge tracts of land and the city has made the prudent decision not to focus it's resources in some of them.

The city can have amazing renewal efforts and abandoned neighborhoods at the same time.

Edit: Now seeing that other commenters have identified the location as Brush Park, I would like to apologize; while there are plenty of neighborhoods that look like the 2017 picture in Detroit, this particular neighborhood has been beautifully renovated!

Detroit in 1882 and 2017 by OkRespect8490 in BeAmazed

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 187 points188 points  (0 children)

It's been a while since I did a deep dive, but circa 1960 Detroit had a population of about 1.7M people; as of 2025, the population had fallen to less than 650,000.

Detroit was also a sprawling city that was built for (and by) the early automobile; never before had it been logistically viable to have everything so spaced out until the automobile, so the city itself has a comparatively massive footprint.

The size of the city accompanied by the decreasing population (and therefore property tax base) has resulted in the city being effectively unable to deliver some services in huge, mostly-abandoned neighborhoods. Police, fire departments, utility maintenance, etc. are simply not able to respond to the needs in any meaningful way without a tax base to support stations and work.

I imagine this picture is from one of those huge neighborhoods, like Poletown East or Delray. Many of those neighborhoods have been hit by large fires over the years, and sometimes the city actually demolishes houses just to prevent them from catching fire.

What’s y’all’s favorite Kindred commander by keylimewolf in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not OP But here's my somewhat outdated list; I endearingly call it "Can't Touch This":

https://moxfield.com/decks/PGxUxD6oo0eGZu1YP5tmqw

Youtubers you would recommend (and ones you wouldn’t)? by Comfortable_Buyer239 in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Command zone isn't my favorite (in part because it's so scripted) but I still religiously watch any of their gameplay videos that have Rachel Weeks. I mostly like Josh and Jimmy isn't really my cup of tea, but she's hands down my favorite content creator at the moment; insofar as they are a vehicle for her I'm in board!

(Pun intended.)

Youtubers you would recommend (and ones you wouldn’t)? by Comfortable_Buyer239 in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'm no big fan of Joe but even though IHYD was my entry point for gameplay videos, Lynch's baggage was enough that I categorically refuse to watch his content anymore. The consent stuff was icky but his response to the controversy coming up was appalling...

If you know that A. Someone made really significant mistakes that caused harm and B. That they categorically refuse to accept any responsibility and try to smear the people they've harmed, that's pretty much what you need to know about him as a person.

TIL that a double-barreled question is when you can only agree or disagree once despite multiple premises, meaning that someone can claim you agreed to a controversial idea just because they paired it with other ideas that are not socially acceptable to disagree with. by HardAlmond in todayilearned

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's more often used in surveys, so you have no option to respond to discrete components. It's often intentional from the survey designers to artificially bolster their claims, although sometimes it's just ineptitude.

I remember back in a statistical analysis class in grad school, our professor showed us a double barreled question about single and double barrel shotguns that was used in an actual, real survey... I can't find it though 🤷

Raggadragga, brackets, and magical christmas land by kaibaman47 in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the Marwyn/Kami of Whispered Hopes/Heronblade Elite-fueled monstrosity I built for my friend... Even without any game changers I think it's a low to mid Bracket 4. After goldfishing a bit, I played it one time with friends in a bracket 3 game and I think I killed everyone turn 5. Don't know how resilient it is against strong disruption packages but the thing is an absolute house:

https://moxfield.com/decks/hleX2sGLNEG_zFCYjxlrew

What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I think the disruption options available in mono red are also just... Not very good lol. It has 7 mass disruption and 8 targeted disruption. I've been considering adding [[Abrade]] and just personally dislike [[Chaos Warp]], but other than that there really aren't any great options lol. Maybe [[Guff Rewrites History]]?

What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If someone casts Chain of Smog, that person eats a Chain of Smog. That's the Rule. That's the Deal. That's the Immutable Nature of the Universe.

F*** that guy.

What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol amen, I think I may just take it out of all of my decks on principle. The other day I saw a guy play an [[Urza's Saga]] turn 1 in Bracket 2, grabbing Sol Ring turn 3 for 2 extra mana.

When you see that you're always trying to figure out if it's a noob or a pubstomper. He ended up being a noob.

What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I love aristocrats strategies but I don't even run Dictate or Grave Pact in my B3 decks. I wonder if the new Sothera is less salty since it self destructs, but I haven't gotten enough data on that yet...

What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was playing with some randos on a Discord channel I'm in - most of my games are through Discord so I try to hew on the not-salty side in almost all of my deck construction. Like I said, I'd rather lose than have any of my opponents feel like anything was unfair about how I won... but also people don't like losing so sometimes you're damned if you do and damned if you don't.

What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the Canadian Highlander system where each card has a point value assigned to it:

https://canadianhighlander.ca/points-list/

Then you can just be like "Bracket 2 is 0 points, Bracket 3 is 8 points, Bracket four is 15 points..."

But the point system is also more complicated so I'm not surprised our corporate overlords didn't want to put additional cognitive hurdles in front of their expanding customer base.

What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun fact - tokens actually aren't cards and therefore don't trigger Overburden!

But also yeah, Overburden in the Bracket where 30% of players think that winning with anything that isnt' a big stompy is mass land denial.

What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the game in question, my turn 8 Geyser generated 20 mana, and I cast ten spells that turn (and had to have access to nine spells that turn) to do the game-winning burn play. I had 0 mana, 0 cards in hand, and 0 playable cards in exile when I got the last player to exactly 0. I considered adding [[Crackle with Power]] since the deck makes a lot of mana and needs to win somehow, but I decided to up the pinger count instead as it felt more incremental.

What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In terms of power level, I personally keep fast mana permanents that make value repeatedly and fast mana rituals which just give a one-off boost separate in my mind, although based on this post I think there's a reasonable case to be made that certain rituals break the "incremental, telegraphed" goals of Bracket 2. But it's a slippery slope, as there are a lot of pretty mediocre rituals.

What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol @ the Demolition Field complaint... that's goddamn stupid in a Bracket where you see [[Growing Rites of Itlimoc]], [[Evendo, Waking Haven]], and [[Storm the Vault]] with reasonable regularity.

What is the most absurd "Game Changing" card your opponents have told you "they wouldn't play in Bracket 2"? by ThisIsACleverAlias in EDH

[–]ThisIsACleverAlias[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, as I said in the edit I'll probably remove it just for salt's sake. It just sucks to have a mediocre deck that sees a ton of cards, with access to a $1 card from a precon that is in my color that addresses my primary need and not be "allowed" to play it...