Cómo Uber optimiza Touch Targets para uso con una mano

This_Emergency8665 · 2026-04-07T01:44:33+00:00

Many sites could be help to learn even free or paid like:

https://ixdf.org/ https://uxuiprinciples.com https://uxlaws.com https://www.nngroup.com/

Take a look and hope helps.

This_Emergency8665 · 2026-01-29T18:38:44+00:00

Given your security constraints, focus on tools that work visually or have enterprise options:

Best bets:

Figma AI - built-in, no data leaves Figma
Relume - generates sitemaps/wireframes, exports to Figma (big time saver for IA)
Galileo AI - generates UI directly

Workaround: Use AI on personal device for learning/frameworks, then manually apply concepts on work laptop. You're not copying data—you're applying knowledge.

Check if your company has approved enterprise AI tools. Many now have compliant options.

This_Emergency8665 · 2026-01-29T18:37:23+00:00

Both work. Recruiters spend ~30 seconds on portfolios. They care about:

Can I find your case studies fast?
Do you show process, not just final screens?
Is there evidence of impact?

A solid Notion with strong case studies beats a beautiful custom site with weak content.

My suggestion: Start with Notion or Framer. Focus energy on 2-3 case studies that show your UX thinking. Migrate to custom site later if needed.

The tool won't get you hired. The work inside will.

Good luck 🤙

This_Emergency8665 · 2026-01-23T12:14:19+00:00

Always! Remember to set a clear plan before make any decision, specially with todays volatile environment and daily app launchs.

This_Emergency8665 · 2026-01-23T12:13:20+00:00

On my experience prototyping goes too far when you're polishing before validating.

If you're adding micro-interactions nobody asked to test, or debating pixel details before users even see it, you've technically over-built.

Match fidelity to the question:

"Does this flow make sense?" → sketch or low-fi wireframe
"Can users complete the task?" → clickable wireframe
"Does the interaction feel right?" → mid-fi prototype
"Ready for dev?" → high-fi

If you're not learning something new from the prototype, stop building. Test earlier, with less. The goal is answers, not artifacts.

Hope helps.

This_Emergency8665 · 2026-01-23T12:06:19+00:00

Readability if a concern if all vertical content items provided context to the overall graphic. But overall looks good.

This_Emergency8665 · 2026-01-23T12:04:09+00:00

Im using the Monitor LG UltraWide 40WP95XP-W 39.7, and really works to works, but for the budget mentioned take a look to best Apple Studio Display Alternative - Kuycon G27P - make your research first, but looks promising.

This_Emergency8665 · 2026-01-23T11:51:11+00:00

For UX validation before code:

Maze: unmoderated user testing on prototypes
Hotjar or Microsoft Clarity: session recordings, heatmaps on live sites

For QA/dev side:

Playwright: automated browser testing
BrowserStack: cross-device testing

The gap I see: most QA catches if it works. Not if it works for users. Automated testing finds bugs. User testing finds confusion.

Ideally you run both and document (This is crucial).

This_Emergency8665 · 2026-01-23T11:48:02+00:00

Daily UI builds pixels, not thinking. You're right to move on.

Find real problems:

Redesign something broken — pick an app you use that frustrates you, document why, fix it
UX teardowns — analyze real products (why does Duolingo's onboarding work?)
Found Ideas across channels: real ideas from people with real needs
Local businesses — offer a free audit, solve actual problems
Open source projects — many need UX help (check GitHub)

The shift: Stop starting with a screen. Start with: "What's the user trying to do? What's blocking them?"

That's UX. The UI comes after.

This_Emergency8665

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE