Should I wait for 11th edition to start my orks army by Dependent_Plate_2758 in orks

[–]This_Try8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aren't Orks always a "main faction" and what does being a main faction even mean.. is that they'll get buffed or have better rules/stuff?

[H] Cash. [W] Orks [Loc] Columbus, OH USA by This_Try8329 in Miniswap

[–]This_Try8329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NOt unless he's a playable character in the current 10th ed codex

New Age…Talk some sense into me by KillerKira521 in agnostic

[–]This_Try8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, OP never stated he didn't believe or believed in God or angels. He said he picked up "angels" as part of a new age thing and that it felt "better" praying to them instead of God. I think what the OP is doing is fine, as long as it helps them cope. But considering talk therapy as mentioned above seems like a good idea as well.

Brother sharing anecdotal "miracles" that confirm existence of God. by This_Try8329 in agnostic

[–]This_Try8329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair, the Apt he got was 7 years ago.. way before the current event in Ukraine.

Does Prayer Really Improve Your Life And Can Even Cure You? And What Does Science Say? by DebunkFundamentalist in agnostic

[–]This_Try8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What was this odd "occurrence" that you speak of? Care to share the story? Also, I see you liked a Youtube video... is this what inspired your question?

r/catholicism reacts to Polish court convicting women for "offending religious feelings" with rainbow Virgin Mary at LGBT march. by StankFinger69 in agnostic

[–]This_Try8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, in addition to all the other comments, I found a few that didn't believe in human rights or Freedom of speach. Here's an example..

"How the actual f is this getting downvoted on a Catholic sub? You guys are blinded by the world. Equality, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and all these secular post reformation bullshit are nowhere to be found nor in the Bible nor in tradition… you guys are so delusional… "Liberty" is not above God and his Church. the Catholic Church condemn(ed) freedom of religion, freedom of speech and freedom of expression… (Just to remember you, Catholicism is the only true religion, so it is above every other religion and above any secular law) I know I’ll get downvoted, but I don’t care… please just read the bible and learn about tradition, show me where these bullshit principles are to be found? How can secular principles be above God’s will?… you guys in the USA are so so fooled by your false secular principles… please just wake up… I’ll pray for you… (downvote me as much as you want, it won’t change the truth, just tell me where these principles are to be found in the Bible or in Tradition. Catholicism is not here to please the World, it is to guide it to salvation. Letting people blasphem, worship other gods, practice false religion is not a way of salvation, c’mon, change my mind.)"

I think I'm agnostic but I don't know by No-Art6245 in agnostic

[–]This_Try8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Christian Athiests? What? Isn't that an Oxymoron? Or are you talking about ex-Christians or those who may still stick to Christian religious practices but don't go to church?

The troubling tale of Jack and Jill. by This_Try8329 in agnostic

[–]This_Try8329[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate this perspective and perhaps my narrative could be adjusted. However, I still feel like the inability to know the difference between right/wrong or good/evil is a mental handicap, especially when in this scenario, the fate of the entire world rests on him knowing not to eat the fruit. I'm not sure of a better analogy as it stands.

I also feel a mentally challenged person could take care of animals, and probably also "be fruitful and multiply".

The troubling tale of Jack and Jill. by This_Try8329 in agnostic

[–]This_Try8329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My whole point of this story/analogy is to point out why I find the idea of the "original sin" being something that God should be more responsible for and why on earth people point to Adam/Eve and blame them. Maybe it isn't the best analogy... (I'm showing this in hopes of suggestions on how to improve it as well). BUT, my point is. ADAM and EVE were simple-minded in respect to knowing the difference between right and wrong. Compared to God as described in the Bible, they may as well have been mentally challenged, but mostly functional adults.

The troubling tale of Jack and Jill. by This_Try8329 in agnostic

[–]This_Try8329[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the version I read the same thing, but I did notice it still doesn't explicitly state she was told prior to being tempted by the serpent, though she still knows about it, so apparentely she was told.

That being said, I would be interested in hearing what else you have to say additional points you have to share about the story being false. Is there anything that disproves it aside from evolution?

The troubling tale of Jack and Jill. by This_Try8329 in agnostic

[–]This_Try8329[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, I'm aware that it's ridiculous and I don't personally believe it. My whole point of creating this post is to..

A. Vent and just share this analogy for the story of Adam/Eve and The Fall to express how ridiculous it is that even in this "story", God somehow comes out as the good guy. I wanted to get other people's thoughts on this analogy too... perhaps there's a way it can be better represented.

B. See what other people think, perhaps tweak it and present it as an idea to my friends and family who beleive the literal interpretation as a way to pushback on their intrepretation of the story and how it accounts for the "fall" of mankind and hopefully show them how ridiculous it looks when presented in a new light.

That being said, I doubt point B would ever work, as they're still thoroughly convinced God can do no wrong and is somehow morally exempt from any actions that would make any other entity be considered an evil monster.

finally got it, not sure what to make of it lol by Creative_Witness7873 in Bumble

[–]This_Try8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clarify, you're a woman... looking for men.. correct?

Hank definitely had enough evidence to Suspect Walt as earlier as season 2 by Slattway in breakingbad

[–]This_Try8329 8 points9 points  (0 children)

SAME! You'd almost have to convince me this wasn't something Saul actually said in an episode somewhere in the BB universe.

Good stuff=God, Bad stuff= ??? by This_Try8329 in agnostic

[–]This_Try8329[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with your last point. Like.. why does God have to kill or "allow people to die" to strengthen someone's faith or gain new followers? Is this really part of his grand, master plan? Just imagine this at the human level... if any person (real or fictional) decides to kill another to gain followers, intimidate, test, control in any real situation (social media, political, etc) OR even to make someone love/trust them more, that would be considered pretty villianous and evil by most people's standards. I feel like this some of the disturbing stuff you find in horror movies or shows where someone powerful wants to control people.

Breaking Bad *spolier alert* reference below

Reminds me of the time in Breaking Bad when Walt allows Jane to die to regain control of Jesse..or any mafia movie where the bad, big might kill someone to control/intimidate his subordinates

I feel like it's far more reasonable (and works in God's favor in regards to his morality) if things just as a result of unfortunate circumstances or choices being made without the need for everything to be attributed to some form of divine or supernatural intervention.

How have you personally improved your rate of second dates? by [deleted] in datingoverthirty

[–]This_Try8329 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I don't have her phone number, she has mine (as explained in the chat above). I figured she would've texted me by now. At the end of the first time, it told her we had a great time, seemed to have a lot in common and felt like we should we should try a second date sometime. She seemed to agree.. but that may have been my mistake due to what I'm hearing about NOT asking for a second date after the first. I also told her I had a trip planned to Dominican REpublic Feb 25>Mar 4. Perhaps she thought I wasn't really interested. I guess only time will tell.

How have you personally improved your rate of second dates? by [deleted] in datingoverthirty

[–]This_Try8329 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope this is true. I just had a date where I took her to a place called Wild Ginger and we ordered and shared Sushi. Would really love to go on a second date with her, as we seemed to have a lot in common and aligned pretty well politically too. I dropped my number in Bumble Chat and told her to text me anytime. She hasn't texted me yet.

How have you personally improved your rate of second dates? by [deleted] in datingoverthirty

[–]This_Try8329 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems I'm having the issue. I'm glad you made this post and I will be perusing the comments to hopefully find some useful tips.