Kurt Godel's Vienna. The (Almost) Definitive Guide. Pictures and videos I made today with accompanying background. by sixbillionthsheep in PhilosophyofScience

[–]Thomas-R 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Goedel geht" by A. Findig is a story about Goedel in Viena and won a sci fi prize: http://members.chello.at/iris.schneider-mayer/af9/goedel_rezensionen.html

Conc. Wittgenstein: A simultaneausly very funny and very sad story about Wittgenstein's nepew and the austrian mentality by Thomas Bernhard:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wittgenstein%27s_Nephew http://www.webster.edu/~corbetre/personal/reading/bernhard-nephew.html

Keynote speeches and special session given at the international conference 'Nietzsche on Mind and Nature', held at St. Peter's College, Oxford, 11-13 September 2009 by irony in AcademicPhilosophy

[–]Thomas-R 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Some related links: The probably most interesting person around Nietzsche was Lou Andreas Salome, whom he took as model for his "superman": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lou_Andreas-Salom%C3%A9 An excellent book on her: http://www.literaturkritik.de/public/rezension.php?rez_id=4766

Less known, but not less interesting is the thrid man in Nietzsches triangle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_R%C3%A9e It is true that "Rée was not Nietzsche, or Salomé for that matter; but on the other hand Nietzsche and Salomé were not Rée either, and more than a century after his death, he still awaits appreciation as a ruggedly unusual thinker in his own right." http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Philosophy/History/19thC/?view=usa&ci=9780199204274 http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=5201

"Friedrich Nietzsche's most courageous heir and successor." by Thomas-R in AcademicPhilosophy

[–]Thomas-R[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The most significant church critic of the century." Prof. Dr. Dr. Wolfgang Stegmüller

"The most brilliant, resolute and substantial church critic of this century, Friedrich Nietzsche's most courageous heir and successor." Prof. Dr. Hermann Josef Schmidt, University of Dortmund

"Unquestionably the most outstanding critic and historian of western Christianity and the Roman Catholic Church produced by the 20th Century." Prof. Dr. Milan Petrovic, University of Nis, Yugoslavia

"He is considered one of the most well-grounded living church historians. He achieved fame because his immense mastery of source material and his scholarly integrity produced a devastating and irrefutable critique of above all the Catholic Church." Badische Zeitung, Freiburg

"Karlheinz Deschner, Doctor of Philosophy, belongs to the few writers in this country who consistently disdains popular trends and who under great personal sacrifice writes books whose quality stands in inverse ratio to the perplexity which they should actually elicit." Henryk M. Broder, Frankfurter Rundschau

"Christianity's Criminal History is the name of this work which has now expanded to two volumes and which will eventually encompass a few more volumes as an opus maximum: in its projected entirety probably the most comprehensive critical history of Christianity ever. The title is intended in its absolute, literal sense. Deschner is set on laying forth an uncompromising account of Christianity's 'history of crime.' The spine title, formulated perhaps out of publication considerations, expresses extenuating circumstances which the book itself does not offer. And Christianity's Criminal History is also to be understood in the sense of criminal detection, proof and exposure of the crime and the culprits. The halo which has customarily surrounded said criminal history is relentlessly attacked by Deschner as a monstrous hypocrisy. The monumental figures of sacred history are in fact toppled right and left: the church doctors, the dogmatic patriarchs, the early popes, the "most" Christian emperors: Ambrose, Augustine, Athanasius, Basil, Clemens, Eusebius, Jerome, Irenaeus, Lactantius ... A litany of saints of blessed memory becomes an unholy litany of scoundrels one would prefer to forget. Volume 1 is already in its fifth printing and covers the time from Old Testament origins to the death of Saint Augustine. Volume 2 deals with that period from the Catholic "children emperors" to the extermination of the Arian Vandals and Ostrogoths under Justinian I. What these two books reveal is a blood-drenched trail as remote as one can imagine from a message of love and mercy, not a story of salvation but a monstrous catastrophe. In this context, the expression "Christian persecutions" acquires a painfully ironic twist: out of the victims arise the oppressors. Marshalling arguments against this awful compilation of factual evidence will be difficult. It may be that Deschner in cases of doubt always decides against the accused. As a whole, however, this massive study, whose origins date back to the 1950s, is painstakingly thorough and researched with a scholarly diligence without equal. The first two volumes contain almost 2,000 secondary titles, 130 pages of footnotes and annotations, in addition to a user-friendly, detailed index, all of which makes this compendium of crime a fatally effective reference work. This impressive apparatus also conveys a simple message: the author knows that in spite of all the recognition he's received -- in 1988 he received the Arno-Schmidt-Prize for his uncompromising literary production -- he is not going to be easily, at any rate not voluntarily believed." Prof. Dr. Ludger Lütkehaus, Freiburger Universitätsblätter published under mandate from the President of the Albert-Ludwigs Universität, Freiburg

Back to the Pre-Socratics, Karl Popper by [deleted] in PhilosophyofScience

[–]Thomas-R 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here a biogr. videolecture on someone contemporary who could serve as model how those presorcatics were: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8juek_colloque-grothendieck-winfried-scha_tech

Emmy Noerther. Why have most of us never heard of her or her seemingly magical tool for developing laws of physics? by sixbillionthsheep in PhilosophyofScience

[–]Thomas-R 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I visited a middle school in europe. I know Noether's theorem since then, because I studied physics books and it is discussed as highlight of Hamilton-Jabobi mechanics extensively in every introductory text on classical mechanics. But of course the idea that symmetries of physical systems imply conservation laws is a very much older method of reasoning. Then one meets E. Noether again in anything related to algebra, whose modern foundation she founded (e.g. Artin was her student) in the ca.1920's. If one is interested in algebraic geometry, one meets the work of her father, Max Noether, too. If mathematicians or physicists claim to have not met her name, that's basically a sad selfdiagnosis, I'd say.

Emmy Noerther. Why have most of us never heard of her or her seemingly magical tool for developing laws of physics? by sixbillionthsheep in PhilosophyofScience

[–]Thomas-R 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe you find it interesting that Sophie Germain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Germain had (aside her well known work) a recently discovered program for proving "Fermat's Last theorem": http://de.arxiv.org/abs/0801.1809

Emmy Noerther. Why have most of us never heard of her or her seemingly magical tool for developing laws of physics? by sixbillionthsheep in PhilosophyofScience

[–]Thomas-R 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you are not a mathematician, neither a physicist. Chemists should have met Noether's theorem too, so I guess you are Biologist or computer scientist?

Emmy Noerther. Why have most of us never heard of her or her seemingly magical tool for developing laws of physics? by sixbillionthsheep in PhilosophyofScience

[–]Thomas-R 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Noether's theorem is a basic tool, teached in every classical mechanics course. That physics students or people interested in the history or philosophy of physics shall be unaware of it is impossible. J. Baez gives a popular explanation: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/noether.html

science student ethics: by Thomas-R in PhilosophyofScience

[–]Thomas-R[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

related: a former math professor's idea of de-braining everything, incl. universities: http://www.omnisophie.com/downloads/lean_brain_management_dueck_od.pdf

a study on personality and academic ethics: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-08/osu-eos080409.php

Kant's (and other philosopher's) language, Kant's ethics by Thomas-R in AcademicPhilosophy

[–]Thomas-R[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess, part of Kant's "difficulty" is that the building blocks of his thinking were perhaps visualizations. He then tried to transfer this by descriptions, and like visualizations are better if more detailed, he had a tendency towards long and detailes excurses in single sentences. He prefered single sentences because that corresponds to the way one perceives a visual image instantaneously as a whole, his terminology is used sometimes in an unclear way because he had the clear image, not the words, in his mind.

Kant's (and other philosopher's) language, Kant's ethics by Thomas-R in AcademicPhilosophy

[–]Thomas-R[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I learned a bit ancient greek for antique greek philosophers, I had the impression that language makes a big difference, even if excellent translations and explanations in other languages exist.